Comments by "Anony Mousse" (@anon_y_mousse) on "Activist Claims Whites Want Her GONE" video.

  1. While I can agree a crime has occurred, what that crime is, is where we disagree. I believe the only crime the guilty party should be charged with, if it wasn't her, is vandalism. The hate crime designation only stirs up more racial tensions and makes things worse, but more than that, it's an infringement on our right to free speech. While I disagree with the sentiment of the message, I believe they have every right to express it as long as it's not through the medium of vandalism. If they made an online post or yelled it into a megaphone, then they'd be a shithead, but I'd argue that it's their right to tell the world what a dick they are. If on the other hand it comes out that she's committing fraud by claiming a crime has occurred that hasn't, then she should be charged with that, which would be wholly different from vandalism, since it's her own property, or that of a hate crime, which is a designation that shouldn't exist. But let's face facts, if anyone can see this, and if they respond, those responses will be hateful because no one ever has a nuanced, i.e. fair and balanced, viewpoint anymore.
    1