Comments by "Hihowareyou Hihowareyou" (@hihowareyouhihowareyou430) on "Into Europe" channel.

@hellothere1656 ⁠⁠ No, they can not coexist. Ffs, have u forgot about the crusades? The problem is the Quran, not the zios. Albania is an exception not the rule. The Quran copied alot from the Bible and then u talk about similarities lol.
8
@hellothere1656 ⁠ Then don’t come to Europe if u find the justice system unfair kid 😂😂
7
@ Triggered? Not at all lol. I enjoy defeating to u, hence why I found u here and started replying again. U have made hundreds of comments replying to me because u were upset that India is richer, more developed, peaceful, safer and better than Pakistan 😂😂. Then u tried to make up ur own criteria where Nepal is better than Pakistan 😂😂. How can I be triggered about something that u are obsessed? So ur justification for Mughal rule was whataboutism but the Maurya empire did not rule over the Afghan Mughals so wtf are u even talking about lol. Now u believe different generations should be punished/rewarded because of the past and now u call that justice lmao. U think collective punishment is fair and yet complain about when it’s done in Gaza.
6
@hellothere1656 What difference does it make if the continents share a border or not? The Ottomans were not that advanced to colonize the Americas or Oceania. Russia did colonize Alaska but couldn’t go any further because they have overextended their empire. The Age of Exploration and colonization of the Americas started as an attempt to bypass the Ottoman control of the Indian Ocean trade routes and access to trade from India and China. The Ottomans never really needed new world colonies or Asian ones because they controlled the land routes and had a strong presence in the sea ones. Who needs the riches of the Americas when you control access to all of the riches of Asia? By the time the Ottomans may have even been interested, the Americas were already under the control of the Europeans and quite far away. U just magically think that the Ottomans were more peaceful than the Europeans when that is not the case at all.
6
@ No it doesn’t kid. According to the latest global slvery index, India has less slvery when compared to many nations like Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, UAE, Kuwait, Turkey, Afghanistan, North Korea, Russia etc… The difference is that slvery is not allowed in India while it is allowed in the Quran. U are obsessed with hindutva when all the stats show that it is not a big problem at all. There is a reason why Europe is not worried about hindutva lol. And yet u are justifying ur ummah to come and stay in Europe lmao. This is totally different from gulf countries that want foreign labor, confiscate their visas so they can’t go back and advertise various schemes to vulnerable members of society.
5
@hellothere1656 ⁠ Not only Persia and Turkey, but Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Egypt ect… while u only talk about Indonesia and Malaysia 😂😂 Exceptions don’t make the rule kid.
4
@hellothere1656 Lmao, u should be the last person complaining about bias. U have no business here calling other ppl biased because they don’t like ur medieval beliefs. If u feel so offended, don’t come to Europe or change ur beliefs.
4
@Caesar2001 America used free African labor. Tf are u talking about lol.
3
@Caesar2001 There is a difference between claiming to invent everything and actually inventing everything. Europe is successful because of geographical luck, which ultimately led to innovation, colonialism ect...
3
@hellothere1656 “If ur country or empire is having its border raided by people from neighboring country or empire, what would u do if the other side refuses to cooperation to stop it?” That implies that the borders u already have are legitimate in the first place when they clearly are not. Ur ummah had no territory before the 7th century, so why would any older, well established civilizations accept ur new arbitrary borders? “If one nation is threatening to attack urs, what would u do?” Again, u are making the false assumption that ur side is innocent, when that is not the case at all. Kashmir chose to join India and asked for Indian assistance. I don’t care whether u consider the Kashmiri ruler at that time illegitimatee.
3
@hellothere1656 Who are u to justify what empires can do? To go to wr in self defense can be justified but to conquerr another territory for generations, completely changing the culture of that land is something else. This is exactly what u guys have been doing throughout history. If u guys didn’t do that to Kashmir, then the majority of people in Kashmir would have been pandits (who would gladly be part of India). In fact, the partition of the British Raj would have never happened if ur empires never came to South Asia.
3
@hellothere1656 “Namibia would exist in some form or another without Germany” prove it. Lmao, u literally believe whatever the kremlin told u so easily. “because they share a border with them where cross border attacks happened” so is that justification for Ukraine to takeover Russia now? It’s not Ukraine that is trying to fund independence movements in Russia. Donetsk and Luhansk tried to breakaway from Ukraine and join Russia just like how Chechnya tried to breakaway from Russia but did Russia allow them to do it? Nope, so why should Ukraine allow Donetsk and Luhansk to break away from Ukraine (especially when Russia is the one funding their independence movements)?
3
@hellothere1656 "They saw Ukraine's democracy got coupled by the CIA in 2014" do u have any fing proof or do u just repeat whatever talking points u find on the internet? The fact is that the majority of Ukraines (especially on the western side) wanted more closer ties with the West.
3
@ U got ur entire history backwards. Pagann Arabia was simply taking the necessary precautions to make sure an armedd revolt would not occur. Not only have u proven that their concerns were legitimatee, but then u remove their idolss from the Kaaba, treatt them as second class citizens in their own land, make them pay a humiliatingg religious tax ect... Not to mention the fact that the Quran talks about paganss in a dehumanizingg way and orderss u guys to subjugatee them to ur rule.
3
@ How can u even believe the paganss (and all the other nearby empires) were just going to sit by and wait for it to happen. U urself admitted that the other empires were not happy with what has happened and clearly that is justified because of what just happened in Arabia. Those other empires know they are next because ur book said so. This is why Europeans must wake up again (like they did in the past).
3
@ Yes, it is. Israel got attackedd on 1947. They foughtt back, won and took some lands as spoilss of wr. Not all Israelis are European settlers either, as a sizable minority of them are Arabs. European settlers founded countries like the US, Canada, Australia ect… so those countries are not real now? At least the Israelis had a religious and ancestral connection to the land, which u don’t care about. Israelis simply purchased land from the British (who owned that area at that time). It’s the Palestinians that didn’t accept their presence and yet u expect the entirety of Europe or India to accept ur presence.
3
@ It doesn’t matter if the rebels were a minority or a majority. Since when are rebels considered legitimate rulers of a land lol. The definition of a rebel itself is a person who rises in opposition or armedd resistancee against an established government or ruler, therefore by definition they are not legitimate and instead trying to overthrow the legitimate ruler. It honestly doesn’t matter if u or the majority of Kashmiri ppl don’t view Hari Singh as legitimate. Thats not how legitimacy works. All treaties are on a piece of paper and all borders are simply lines drawn on a map. All of sudden, now u are upset about treaties/borders that u don’t like 😂😂 Pakistan was trying to take Kashmir for itself. Kashmir was originally a H land and belongs to pundits. Only if Kashmir is a part of India can the demographics shift again in our favor. We were given secular India by the British, not Hindustan. Tell the Kashmiris who don’t like India to go to the Pakistan.
3
@ What is with ur obsession about mentioning Ghandi lmao. It’s a complete red herring so stay on topic. Only the leaders of Pakistan and India agreed to the borders. If u don’t respect Hari Singh’s decision, then u have no credibility to stand on here. Palestine didn’t own the land in the first place so how did Israel steal it 😂😂 Palestine choose wr and were not successful. As u said before, the winner takes some lands as spoils of wr. There was no referendum in Kashmir in 1947 so they didn’t choose Pakistan. If Hari Singh lost control over Kashmir, then no one has control over Kashmir so it is up for grabs. Both india and Pakistan got their share of Kashmir as spoils of wr. Get over it.
3
@ Indigenous communities are always protected and privileged in plenty of countries. Kashmir pundits are no different in that regard. Not only have u dodged plenty of my comments but u have dodged plenty of comments made by someone else too and I have already addressed ur question. We have an instrument of accession signed by the ruler of Hyderabad just like we have an instrument of accession signed by the ruler of Kashmir. Funny how u only accept legal documents and agreed upon borders in certain situations only, hence why I can’t u seriously at all.
3
@ How is alcohol pointless and yet it is used in many societies for a variety of purposes?
3
U are just counting Pakistanis and Bangladeshis as Indian
2
@impressivedark2685 How is it deplorable yet u have a Buddha statue as ur profile pic?
2
@DaliborPerkovic-sw8mh Indians are successful in the UK and US.
2
@DaliborPerkovic-sw8mh income
1
@DaliborPerkovic-sw8mh high income
1
@DaliborPerkovic-sw8mh U don’t know what income is?
1
@pretty7995 Europeans constantly interfere in the affairs of other countries around the world so I don’t know what u are complaining about.
1
@shadowrock but u still benefit from ur ancestors and constantly praise them
1
@metro9640 They aren’t paying him anything. If the Native Americans and Aboriginals can’t have “their land”, then why should the Europeans have “their land”? Even Israel shares “their land” with a sizable Arab minority in their country.
1
@metro9640 No, it’s not about revenge but about the fact that they are millions of Irish people, Polish people, ect… outside of their respective countries and outside of Europe in general, yet u don’t find that problematic at all.
1
@metro9640 The global south doesn’t have as much freedom in running their own countries as u like to believe because of western backed coups, regime change (like Iraq) ect… Let’s also not forgot that the global north took many resources from the global south during colonialism, changed the global south demographics (like in South Africa) and continues to enjoy favorable trade practices because of western backed rulers (neocolonialism). The global north wouldn’t be rich without the global south and the global north itself is the most responsible for this interconnected world.
1
@metro9640 The UK is heavily impacted by Polish immigrants, which is one of the reasons why they left the EU.
1
@metro9640 The UK?
1
@ Yes they did kid. M invaded the Middle East, North Africa, tried to invade Europe, South Asia ect… That’s 3 of the main continents. The only continents that were safe from M are continents that u haven’t discovered or u don’t have the technological ability to reach/conquer. Since when are cross border disputes a justification for invading an empire for centuries and completely changing the culture of the land lmao. U make no sense kid. It’s hilarious how many excuses u try to come up with now to justify ur unpeaceful behavior. No it’s not very different lmao. U believe empires can conquer other empires for centuries, so there is nothing different about the German empire conquering Namibia. Namibia wouldn’t even exist as the country as it is today without Germany. U must think Russia was justified in invading Ukraine, just like how Germany believed they were justified in invading the USSR.
1
@hellothere1656 Yes they did kid. M inva the Middle East, North Africa, tried to inva Europe, South Asia ect… That’s 3 of the main continents. The only continents that were safe from M are continents that u haven’t discovered or u don’t have the technological ability to reach/conqu. Since when are cross border disputes a justification for inva an empire for centuries and completely changing the culture of the land lmao. U make no sens kid. It’s hilarious how many excuses u try to come up with now to justify ur unpeacefu behavio.
1
@hellothere1656 “They saw Ukraine’s democracy got coupled by the CIA in 2014” do u have any fing proof or do u just repeat whatever talking points u find on the internet? The fact is that the majority of Ukraines (especially on the western side) wanted more closer ties with the West. Russia doesn’t like losing control over their proxy, hence why they intervened militarily. Russia tried to takeover the entirety of Ukraine, not just Donetsk and Luhansk, so enough with ur 💩. U have no idea how many lives were impacted because of ur kremlin propaganda.
1
@hellothere1656 Of course I support Ukraine’s, Israel’s and India’s right to defend themselves. U cannot objectively defend why Israel is not a country and the zios legally purchased land from the British mandate of Palestine. Then when Israel was officially created by the partition (similar to what happened in the subcontinent), u all tried to takeover Israel but failed and now have to cope with the ramifications of ur failure. Germany took over Poland because they felt Germans were unfairly treated in Poland and that Poland was planning to takeover Germany. Literally, the same exact talking points that u keep bringing up so u should have no problem with what Germany did. The USSR claimed to be acting to protect the Ukrainians and Belarusians who lived in eastern Poland, who they said were trapped in territory illegally annexed by Poland. I don’t justify any of this but u clearly do with ur criteria.
1
@hellothere1656 Russia doesn't like losing control over their prox, hence why they intervened militarily. Russia tried to takeover the entirety of Ukraine, not just Donetsk and Luhansk, so enough with ur . U have no idea how many livess were impactedd because of ur kremlin propagandaa.
1
@Caesar2001 It can be good depending on the country they are coming from.
1
@Caesar2001 Well it depends on the country they are coming because Indians seem to be the richest ppl in plenty of western countries.
1