Comments by "DynamicWorlds" (@dynamicworlds1) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder"
channel.
-
777
-
226
-
207
-
199
-
115
-
114
-
86
-
82
-
68
-
63
-
49
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
39
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
31
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
2. The rejection of modernism. “The Enlightenment, the Age of Reason, is seen as the beginning of modern depravity. In this sense Ur-Fascism can be defined as irrationalism.”
3. The cult of action for action’s sake. “Action being beautiful in itself, it must be taken before, or without, any previous reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation.”
See also: obsession with a plot, cult of heroism and death, viewing life as lived for struggle, contempt for the weak, and preoccupation with feelings of frustration and humiliation.
We're not looking at stupidity, per se, but simply fascist rhetoric.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Please go look up "Debt the first 5000 years." to dispell the rediculous notions of the origin of money hypothesized by Adam Smith (and debunked by the entire field of anthropology)
Real money (including, yes, fiat, which is a misnomer) isn't some magic thing invented to smooth out barter, but instead represents (dirrectly or indirrectly) paid debt to those who work outside the market in some form of public service. It is spent into the economy to pay public servants, and it has value for them to trade in the market economy because the taxes (which are, functionally, a confirmation that you have paid your debt to the people that make your civilization possible) create an effectively universal demand for said currency.
The problem with our currency isn't that the government can issue as much of it as they want. The problem is that private, for-profit banks are in control of most of the creation of money in our system (look up "sovereign money" for schools of thought which actually counter those issues)
Gold and cryptocurrencies both have the problem of a largely finite supply, meaning that the supply of currency cannot grow to match a growing economy, which means that any growth in the economy not matched by a comperable aquisition of your chosen monitary unit will produce deflation (which is bad for an economy).
On top of that, their current price (especially for cryptocurrencies) is only there because new people keep putting real money into the system. In short, cryptocurrencies are impractical on a large scale for multiple reasons and fit the definition of a Ponzi scheme and gold's problems are long documented. Once we dispell the myths about money (and take back control of our government from the moneyed interests) we will be able to fix the problems with our current system fairly easily.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"2. Traditionalism implies the rejection of modernism. Both Fascists and Nazis worshiped technology, while traditionalist thinkers usually reject it as a negation of traditional spiritual values.
However, even though Nazism was proud of its industrial achievements, its praise of modernism
was only the surface of an ideology based upon Blood and Earth (Blut und Boden). The rejection
of the modern world was disguised as a rebuttal of the capitalistic way of life, but it mainly concerned the rejection of the Spirit of 1789 (and of 1776, of course). The Enlightenment, the Age of
Reason, is seen as the beginning of modern depravity. In this sense Ur-Fascism can be defined as irrationalism.
3. Irrationalism also depends on the cult of action for action’s sake. Action being beautiful in
itself, it must be taken before, or without, any previous reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation. Therefore culture is suspect insofar as it is identified with critical attitudes. Distrust of the
intellectual world has always been a symptom of Ur-Fascism"
-Umberto Eco's 14 Characteristics of Ur-fascism
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yeah, the subtle ways reactionaries are promoting violence while maintaining plausible deniability is a really big problem, but at the same time, history shows that when push comes to shove, capital tends to me more opposed to anything left-wing than fascism, so letting a mega-corp control discourse (especially under the pretense of being advertiser friendly) runs a real danger of them suppressing all left-wing content more than reactionaries, as long as they aren't too overy about it...and history shows that when capitalism is in crisis, and left wing voices are silenced, you get fascism.
There is a really interesting conversation there, but even if Jimmy were able to set his emotions aside (which when can he?), he's nowhere near smart enough for that conversation.
Kyle and Sam might be up for it and it could be really interesting if they bring their A game and keep their heads.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@peterbondy I mean, don't get me wrong either, that is happening and I would much rather people be vocalizing that frustration in calling out, for example, Biden's ageism instead of making more wierd essentialist statements about older generations.
Identifying and calling out bigotry for what it is, is much more productive than taking a less targeted approach to reacting to bigotry dirrected towards one's group (as we have seen with other civil rights issues).
How to get from where we are where the understanding of what's happening to the younger generations being ageism as subconscious to a more productive reaction of calling a spade a spade instead of the normal reaction we see now, though, idk, beyond doing my very small part in putting the right labels on things and do things like steer the conversation in a more productive dirrection.
I do appriciate your willingness to listen, btw, agree that a lot of the comments weren't things I would say I really approve of, and hope that came across.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@richsackett3423 the only other candidate with a chance in hell of both winning the nomination and the general is Warren (aka Obama 2.0) and we already saw what a president that was a lot of progressive talk with no conviction did to the political discourse, shifting the Overton Window so far to the right that it paved the way for a protofascist. (& btw, one of the last things Obama did in his term, after Trump's election, was to quitely increase executive power which he never used, instead leaving it as a housewarming gift for Trump)
By all means, if you want Warren to replace Trump's incompetent protofascism, get nothing significant accomplished, only to be followed by a full-blown fascist (the timing of which, btw, will make us miss the deadline to avert climate catastrophe), go ahead; double down on the blue no matter who strategy that brought us to Hillary vs Trump in the first place.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1