Comments by "DynamicWorlds" (@dynamicworlds1) on "Adam Ragusea"
channel.
-
126
-
46
-
37
-
29
-
22
-
17
-
17
-
14
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
6
-
6
-
Strictly speaking, they don't have to understand the nutrition for it to be why those foods are combined. All else being equal, if 2 cultures are competing, the one with the food culture that combines foods in a more healthy way is going to have an advantage and (though one of many means) be more likely to survive and have its food culture spread.
Understanding is not required for the selection process to take place anymore than it is with genetic evolution.
They are healthy to eat in combination can flow right into a causal relation to the frequency in which they are combined.
Even down to a smaller level, a family with healthier family recipes is more likely to produce more children who are able to grow into healthy adults who are able to have healthy kids of their own. Likewise, if a family is doing well, others are more likely to emulate things they are doing, even without any understanding of if or why those things would confer an advantage. "What are you feeding them?" is, afterall, something said to a parent who's children are growing up bigger and stronger than average.
Whether you want to call it memetics or dual inheritance theory or something else, the fundamentals of evolution (selection+reproduction with random variation) apply to ideas and culture, not just biology.
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1