Comments by "DynamicWorlds" (@dynamicworlds1) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

 @lluchadden4040 but it never will. We need different politicians who are responsive to the working class and not just big money donors.
9
@ideapowerfulweapon giving the homeless housing is cheaper and more ethical.
6
@saltysoldier68 How can I answer where I was when something happened that didn't happen??? (Also, told you already, I'm a leftist, not a liberal. Learn to read please.)
3
 @jayzillawashere wrong
3
@dismurrart6648 it's cheaper to just give homeless housing than to criminalize homelessness.
2
@Zooch I said absolutely nothing about forgiving or forgetting. The fact that you went there is just proving my point about you being so unhinged that you aren't caring about the facts. I appriciate your eagerness to demonstrate exactly what I was saying, though.
2
@johnrobi0 ....really, victim blaming someone murdered by a fascist terrorist? Totally not obvious what your political stance is! /S
2
Because (to paraphrase George Carlin) homelessness is something they WANT to exist to scare the shit out the working class and keep them showing up at their underpaid jobs. All the poor treatment of homeless people just exists to reinforce the threat against every working class person. It would be cheaper to just give homeless people housing but they'll never do that because they want all of us who work for a living too terrified and desperate to fight for the pay we actually deserve. Never forget that homelessness exists to threaten YOU.
1
@2Truth4Liberty are you incapable of using Google?
1
@thedaredevil1907 who, tf, is "they"??? Be specific or stfu.
1
@saltysoldier68 Projection!!!
1
@Strict Salty Diet If you're referring to the incident that happened this month to deflect from Trump's Epstein connections and all the other sex offences of GOP politicians, or their legislation that protects rapists (from trying to scare off people from reporting rapes to trying to block sex ed which has been shown to help protect children from being sexually abused), or their defense of child marriage...well, just fact-checked it, and it didn't happen. The liars on your side just took him out of context, as is typical. Anything to deflect from how those you support are so much worse in every way than the liberals (who, as a leftist, I have no shortage of negative things to say about)
1
@saltysoldier68 Yes, that is what you're going. Very good there kiddo...oh wait, did you think it was deflection for me to point out that you were spreading fake news? Lol that's helarious 😆
1
@saltysoldier68 You're already struggling to handle one point at a time, so I'm going to break this down again nice and slow. 1-if you're referring to the recent incident about that word, it didn't happen. Your sources lied. 2-I have been and will continue to be vocally critical of Biden and other liberals for being far too much like you 3-Trump was worse on all these issues, so it's obvious you don't actually care about any of it. If you can show you're capable of understanding these points, we can move onto something else after.
1
Larry Holiday look, I'm not vouching for those who let him out in any way, but do you think it might be a bit premature for that?
1
@saltysoldier68 You're lying about Biden, and saying whatever you think will distract from me calling you on it. Aka: deflecting
1
@saltysoldier68 Since you struggle to understand how words work, look up the article "No, Joe Biden Did Not Refer to Satchel Paige as a ‘Negro’ During Veterans Day Speech" on Mediaite to have your failing in understanding how the English language works (when understanding would be inconvenient for you) explained to you. Oopsies! I can cite shit too...just, you know, correctly because I'm fluent in English. (Btw, I said we were sticking to that claim first, so we're not talking about the China stuff right now unless you're able to find where I said Biden wasn't racist anywhere on the internet at any point. Like I said, he's too much like you for my tastes.)
1
Because (to paraphrase George Carlin) homelessness is something they WANT to exist to scare the shit out the working class and keep them showing up at their underpaid jobs. All the poor treatment of homeless people just exists to reinforce the threat against every working class person. It would be cheaper to just give homeless people housing but they'll never do that because they want all of us who work for a living too terrified and desperate to fight for the pay we actually deserve.
1
@lynwill9946 “You want to know what this was really all about? The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.” -John Ehrlichman (Nixon’s chief domestic advisor)
1
Because (to paraphrase George Carlin) homelessness is something they WANT to exist to scare the shit out the working class and keep them showing up at their underpaid jobs. All the poor treatment of homeless people just exists to reinforce the threat against every working class person. It would be cheaper to just give homeless people housing but they'll never do that because they want all of us who work for a living too terrified and desperate to fight for the pay we actually deserve. Never forget that homelessness exists to threaten YOU.
1
@devonalomar9012 wrong. Housing first policies are proven to work. Stop drinking the Kool aid and spreading disinfo.
1
Because, reality check, it's entirely normal for initial reports to be extremely conservative (the non-political definition of the term) for criminal cases because overstating things can cause problems later. Everyone needs to just chill out and wait for more information to come in.
1
@FltBdN87 yeah, metaphorically I like to wait until they get their toes in then strike the back of the heal so they choke on it harder. They're so predictable that it's not even hard. Just the slightest nudge and they'll set themselves up for it for me all on their own.
1
@yohnjates no "fleeing a domestic disturbance" is a standard statement of fact for this kind of incident, reguardless of who or why. This early after an incident very reserved statements like that are the norm, not evidence of an agenda. Kinda suspect that you're unaware of that fact, but this quick to jump on this incident, ngl.
1
@Zooch I deliberately do not have a twitter account. Another swing and a miss there. Doesn't being dead wrong this often clue you in to how brainwashed you are?
1
@yohnjates what makes it different? It's so incredibly new and you're not this quick to jump on stories that aren't about black people, so you didn't notice this was normal. That's what's different. But by all means, keep telling on yourself. And see, that's the thing. They're not trying to lay out a narrative beyond "these are broadly the events and the order they happened in" yet. They never implied one caused the other. You're just so obsessed with getting a narrative that fits your agenda out asap that you can't even see that.
1
@Zooch I very deliberately did not put "always" into that sentence. Nice try though. Maybe go back to middle school and learn to read before you dive into conversations for adults.
1
@yohnjates yeah, gee you think the white nationalist hate mob jumping on this hard before there was sufficient information out may have gotten this pushed up the algorithm sooner than a normal news story??? Come on dude, engage a 3rd braincell, please. You don't normally follow this kind of story this soon after the event, but it was presented quicker to you because people like you have been rabidly clicking and commenting on this over everything else, because you've got a bias to push with it, unlike other stories which you normally let develop for a bit if you get to them at all. This is really basic stuff, I promise.
1
@johnrobi0 I'm as far left as you can get while still technically being a social democrat with heavy sympathies for democratic socialists and anarchists. I'm not giving away shit because I don't have to hide my political affiliation like you do, fascist. I can openly state and defend my politics in polite company because my politics aren't repulsive to everyone with a functioning moral compass like yours.
1
@johnrobi0 look up the paradox of tolerance. Yes, we're intolerant of fascism. That used to be something we could all agree was a patriotic American stance and I don't think that changes just because you loosers decided to put one in the Whitehouse. We're not even getting into the irony of a fascist criticising someone else's rationality.
1
@johnrobi0 I can do you one better. See Lawrence Britt's & Umberto Eco's lists of 14 characteristics and "palengenetic ultranationalism" for 3 definitions of fascism Trump is a textbook example of...or you can just look up "Trump Nazi Facebook ad" if you need an unambiguous single example to illustrate that even he knows full-well what he is. Not that I think this is anything but you playing dumb. Btw, you're projecting again, and projecting part of one of one of the 14 characteristics for good measure.
1