Comments by "DynamicWorlds" (@dynamicworlds1) on "Corporate Democrat Accidentally Endorses Bernie 2020" video.

  1. @Sheep #5491 yes, the most consistent politician in the country is going to be exactly the same as politicians who get most of their money from special interests, vote establishment, and portray themselves as progressive visionaries. /s Your head is at least as far up your own ass as the people you want to mock and you think in equally simplistic terms.
    18
  2. @Sheep #5491 yeah, because Obama and Bernie have identical voting records /s You're colorblind
    9
  3. The racist vote always goes red. If Trump was about racism, we would have expected to see a bump in the proportion of the total population that voted GOP. Instead, we had completely normal (even slightly low) turnout, meaning Trump turned more people off by the overt bigotry than he dragged off their couches by not being subtle about it. The anomaly we do see, however, is that between election and taking office (a time when a president's approval numbers normally go Up) his approval numbers dropped sharply. What was the only significant thing to happen in that time? He picked his cabinet, proving to everyone paying attention with 2 brain cells that he wasn't going to "drain the swamp". Basically, non-racists voted for Trump because they knew that Hillary was 100% corrupt and going to work against them, so they took a gamble on the wild card. You want to know why we have president Trump? Stop looking at Trump. Look at the 2nd most disliked candidate in US history who rigged the dem primary, overtly scorned those she stole it from, colluded with the media to push Trump through the GOP primary, and ran such an incompetent campaign that (among many other failings) hit Trump with attacks so incompetently that it helped a compulsive liar seem like a straight-shooter. Hell, even just looking at the polling leading up to the election (where they leaned towards Trump when Hillary was speaking publicly and away from Trump when she was out of the public eye) shows that the election was just a reaction to her and what she represented, not a favoring of Trump (the most disliked presidental candidate in US history). The only part of the 2016 election results that can't be traced back to the establishment "democrats" is interstate crosscheck, and even that voter disenfranchisement program is something they ignored for years and pulled something similar in their own primary, so they had no room to suddenly complain about. Sure, racism is a problem and Trump emboldened them to be more overt and violent, that's all true, but if you want to understand the 2016 election, you need to look no further than the cover of Hillary's book: What Happened? Hillary Clinton
    6
  4. Counterpoint: FDR
    6
  5.  @indymarrow8050  a: I know what socialism is b: I'm not a socialist c: I just haven't been indoctrinated into the "free market" faith, so actually am able to look at things objectively d: you say I don't understand, but you haven't refuted one point I've made You're just plugging your ears and saying "no, you're wrong" like someone who believes the world is 6000 years old when someone tries to explain evolution.
    5
  6. Hillary, like Trump, is a psychopath. A moral epiphany is impossible there. Accept that the rulers of this country are very often monsters in human form.
    4
  7.  @indymarrow8050  let's put this in very simple terms: Money is power One of the uses of power when there is any imbalance in it is to aquire more power Therefore, unregulated markets will always lead to exponentially increasing inequality There's no escaping that truth (and we didn't even get into externalities or the prisoner's dilemma)
    4
  8.  @indymarrow8050  "give all the money to the government" wtf does that even mean? Money exists because the government spends it into existence to pay public servants, has universal value because it's what the government accepts as payment for fees and taxes, and exists in between those steps as a representation of debts paid (dirrectly or indirrectly) to those who work in fields outside of normal markets to make a society function. Since the very invention of coinageb "giving all the money to the government" is a concept that makes no sense if you understand what money is. As to wages, do I want government to have total control over them? No, that level of micromanaging doesn't really work. Do I want the government to do some things about income inequality? Yes, because as I've stated and you haven't refuted, people need to organize in some way outside of markets to put a check on the inevitable trends of markets. People organizing to collectively decide on rules for a society to be run by isn't tyranny; it's democracy (representative or otherwise). "The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it comes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism - ownership of government by an individual, by a group,” -FDR As banks were able to force our government to bail them (instead of the people our government is supposedly by, for, and of) out of a crash they created themselves, by FDR's (and Mussolini's) definition(s) we're already bordering on fascism, and it isn't because of people wanting to limit economic inequality. Sorry to tell you, but you've been fed a line of BS because it was to certain people's advantage to have you spouting off unintelligible nonsense and ignoring sound reasoning against what you've been taught to believe like it was a religion.
    4
  9.  @live2groove  Donald Trump isn't a full fascist, no, but he's an authoritarian, bigotted, oligarch with sympathies towards fascism and Nazi supporters (or as others have put it: a proto-fascist) That all said, I wasn't talking about Trump exactly. I was talking about the rise of fascist political movements domestically and globally. (That said, Mussolini and FDR both had definitions of fascism that were pretty close to oligharchy as the merger of buisness and state and the growth of private power such that it becomes more powerful than the democratic state, so that should tell you how close we are) As to your other question that is a false dichotomy, but of course I'll be watching and voting on the whole ballot as well.
    3
  10.  @live2groove  is it really? We have the rise of facism, are still recovering from the worst economic crash since the great depression and about to hit one at least as bad. On top of that, most Republican voters support many of Bernie's core policies and at least trust the man's character even if they disagree. It wasn't GOP voters that stopped progressivism in 2016, but the establishment by rigging the election, and with people watching the election integrity and the rise of people advocating real socialism, there's only so much of that they can do before the disaffected masses start polarizing even more into fascist and comminist groups yet again.
    2