Comments by "DynamicWorlds" (@dynamicworlds1) on "Dave Rubin On Fox News: Dangerous Left-Wing Rhetoric Will Excuse Violence" video.

(Non-Islamic) Right wing terrorists have committed more attacks within the US than even Islamic terrorists in this millennia. All other terrorism combined from ecoterrorism to Antifa to black nationalists doesn't even come close. There is no equivalency in hate or unreasonableness when the worst the worst the left has is antifa sometimes falling into the "he who fights monsters" problem by using facist tactics, and the right has actual NAZIS! I'm getting really tired of making the distinction between Nazis and those spreading propaganda/providing cover for them due to money/lolz (rather than ideologic agreement) only to be called unreasonable by those same people.
3
Wells Bush, Obama, and Trump have all been called traitors frequently (and correctly, though that's a different discussion). Your argument is invalid.
2
(Non-Islamic) Right wing terrorists have committed more attacks within the US than even Islamic terrorists in this millennia. All other terrorism combined from ecoterrorism to Antifa to black nationalists doesn't even come close. There is no equivalency in hate or unreasonableness when the worst the worst the left has is antifa sometimes falling into the "he who fights monsters" problem by using facist tactics, and the right has actual NAZIS! I'm getting really tired of making the distinction between Nazis and those spreading propaganda/providing cover for them due to money/lolz (rather than ideologic agreement) only to be called unreasonable by those same people.
1
Wells statistically, I just proved to you by what is likely the best metric that the rhetoric on the right is far more dangerous and toxic than anything that could even be misconstrued as the left, including groups I disagree with like antifa and even black nationalists (who being ethno-nationalists are right wing by definition, even though the FBI statistics count them separately)....and now you want to try to lie to make a false equivalency between the sides and claim I'm not acknowledging the toxicity on the left even though I explicitly cited the existence of left-wing terrorism? Tell us all why you're being so dishonest to cover for Nazis. I think we'd all love to hear an answer to that you damn Nazi apologist.
1
I called you a Nazi apologist because that's exactly what you've been doing. You straw-maned Seronemo__ who was talking about extremists, when you brought it to the mainstream right. I exposed the implied false equivalence (a logical fallacy often used in propaganda) in your comment and brought the discussion back to measuring the actions of extremists who might be presumed to align with the rhetoric of the left or right and radicalized in part by the rhetoric (a subject brought up in the video). You then, as I mentioned, not only straw-maned me and continued the false equivalency, but claimed I "refuse to admit the toxicity of the mainstream left" even though I explicitly cited the existence of left-wing terrorism. Now you're trying to erase all that, claim the decades of racial dog-whistling from the right doesn't mean they have any culpability for the Nazi violence, but try to pin antifa's actions to the left and me (even though I've explicitly said I don't agree with them, and refuse to be baited into defending them). Even if you're not "elevating the Nazis" that means you're trying to drag down the entire left and paint the mainstream left as toxically radicalizing and to be avoided, which would leave them virtually unopposed as the right refuses (or is unable) to reign them in. That is Nazi apologetics. You are pushing Nazi propaganda, and frankly, your insistence on holding to that means that you're indistinguishable from a Nazi trying to pretend to be a moderate. Don't like how you look to others, change how you, but as I've sufficiently proven how dishonest you are I'm done with a possible Nazi.
1
"Seronemo__ said nothing about extremists, instead only making a comment about white supremacy" lmao You just implicitly admitted that you don't consider white supremacy to be extremism and didn't even realize it! That really says it all. Why didn't you lead with that? Could have saved so much time. Seriously though, thanks for the belly laugh, take the last word, I won't reply, promise.
1
(Non-Islamic) Right wing terrorists have committed more attacks within the US than even Islamic terrorists in this millennia. All other terrorism combined from ecoterrorism to Antifa to black nationalists doesn't even come close. There is no equivalency in hate or unreasonableness when the worst the worst the left has is antifa sometimes falling into the "he who fights monsters" problem by using facist tactics, and the right has actual NAZIS! I'm getting really tired of making the distinction between Nazis and those spreading propaganda/providing cover for them due to money/lolz (rather than ideologic agreement) only to be called unreasonable by those same people.
1