Comments by "DynamicWorlds" (@dynamicworlds1) on "Overly Sarcastic Productions"
channel.
-
1800
-
1600
-
684
-
205
-
125
-
112
-
106
-
100
-
87
-
85
-
84
-
75
-
74
-
71
-
71
-
68
-
66
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
59
-
58
-
54
-
51
-
49
-
41
-
40
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
35
-
34
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
26
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
Maniacman2030 except that models of gender that aren't just male=man/female=woman can be found in plenty of societies of varrying levels of development from modern to hunter-gatherer, even in societies that do have a gender binary the roles differ significantly across time and region, intersexed people exist, we have brain scans that can show differences between cis- and transgendered individuals, behavioral and mental aptitude differences between sexes do not show clear distinctions (instead show mere tendencies), and (much like homosexuality) attempts to change how a person feels to how they look only result in negative mental health outcomes.
So that means the fields anthropology, history, neurology, behavioral psychology, cognitive psychology, and psychotherapy all oppose rigid gender binaries.
6 fields of study agreeing is pretty solid support, and we have prescient for the same argument we're having today over trans-acceptance back with gay acceptance (which was also labeled as a mental disorder with some pretty horrific history of "correction treatments")
17
-
17
-
16
-
Yup, in the universe of the fate series, Aturia (female Arthur pretending to be a man to fill the role of king, with only her closest friends and advisors knowing the truth) and marries Guinevere, a close friend, so Camelot has a queen.
She learns of the love between Lancelot and Guinevere, and allows it to continue as long as it's secret as she sees the real love between them, but things go bottoms up when the affair that Arturia was pretending not to be aware of goes public.
Tragic for all involved.
Also, supposedly there's magic stuff at play that makes Mordred, and a LOT of other stuff, because the "original" legends (in their altered forms) are just background for the fate stories.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
IMO, the less Galahad we get the better unless someone does a good job wiping the Sue-ness off him. Gwain, Tristain, and some of the other knights of the round table would be nice to see more of though.
There's some nice story that can be done with Arthur, Gwain, Merlin, and Morgan if both the latter stick to their pegan versions over the change from the old pegan ways. Arthur in some versions of the tales embodies the change from older pegan ways to a new religion and society, and the ways and reasons each react to that could be explored a fair bit.
You can make a lot of stories around little 3-4 character sets around a theme, but then all the stories center around Arthur as he ties all the stories together. Then, you can have a narrative over all of them of how both how powerful a group built around a great leader can be, but also how fundamentally fragile such a structure can be when it all comes crashing down.
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@anna_in_aotearoa3166 I think it was largely a stability thing. If the merchants are more segregated from political and social power, their accumulation of economic power is easier to keep in check. Likewise, having your largest demographic block be the lowest rung of a heirachal system is a breeding ground for unrest.
While you see a lot of feudal and feudal-like power structures depicted like pyramids, that's actually incredibly unstable as it means that the group with the most to gain by knocking it down is also the largest group.
If you want to keep an oppressive system in place, you need to not just segrigate the types of power (so only those at the very top can have all forms in abundance) but make that structure more diamond-shaped. This gives the majority of people someone to feel better than and, by doing to others what you to to them, constantly encourage them to rationalize kicking down as "just the way things are" and to see any anti-heirarchy movements as a threat to their position rather than a possibility for their own liberation. Also, just broadly, getting people to blame those "below" them for their problems keeps the attention away from those at the top.
Any such heirachal system will either need to put a certain caste there, or turn to marginalizing ethnic, religious, and/or sexual minorities to fill the scapegoat role if they don't want the people to start realizing that "hey, maybe we don't actually need these rulers above us all the time"
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1