General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
DynamicWorlds
David Pakman Show
comments
Comments by "DynamicWorlds" (@dynamicworlds1) on "David Pakman Show" channel.
Previous
3
Next
...
All
Who else thinks getting a pipe bomb will change CNN's commitment to false neutrality? Me neither.
1
No, we just need to finally understand how money works, retake control of our currency from the banking sector so we have sovereign money again and we'll be fine.
1
@BobBob-gz5hj if they poll them and then discard the numbers of all younger voters that's the same as not polling them, and when they then present the numbers as representative of the whole population, that's dishonest. Are you honestly that stupid that you can't see that, or are you being paid? And that's just the tip of the iceberg of how the CNN poll fudged the numbers.
1
I'm going to blame both the fascist leaders and those who fall in line behind them for whatever reason, thank you very much.
1
No, he represents the oligarchy that has usurped our government.
1
A lot of what our nation does right now doesn't hold up constitutionally, so don't count on that.
1
Verizon? Might as well suck Ajit Pai off. How have so many people forgotten that he's one of their agents?? Come on, now, if you let your attention span be that short you're always going to being played like a fool.
1
@John.T. ballparking numbers but, if 90% is harmful BS and the remaining 10% is able to be found elsewhere (even in older sources), why cite the source at all? Btw, the 7 deadly sins aren't actually in the bible, nor that great a list to begin with.
1
It would've been gone a decade ago if your cable company and ISP weren't the same company.
1
Adarsh lal https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Alt-right_glossary#NPC
1
Adarsh lal more like they played projection with it...as usual
1
Adarsh lal most likely, yes. Some may be doing it consciously, but that seems both less common and somehow even more pathetic.
1
@michaelk.jensen1611 not to attack you, but on the subject of the Status Coup video, it was very detailed and broke down multiple ways in which the polling was done incredibly dishonestly. Frankly, and again, not attacking you personally, I'm running out of patience with "progressives" who immediately tune out as soon as they get a whiff of someone implying even a small conspiracy before considering evidence even though small and medium-sized conspiracies happen all the time in our corrupt country. We have a guilty plea for targeted illegal voter disenfranchisement in NY (among other things), but still we have people calling themselves progressives who insist that 2016 was legit.
1
Well, other than the bible repeatedly endorsing a theocratic monarchy, and not a word for democratic government in the first place?
1
@timekeeper2538 just look up US excess deaths to see how much bs the people you've been listening to have been feeding you and then stop trusting them for news and medical information.
1
@timekeeper2538 plenty aren't, "who cares if fat people die" is monsterous, we've literally had cancer patients and others forced to postpone treatment because of hospital overcrowding (even with how much we're overworking our hospital staff which is going to affect overall medical care in this country for decades), and death isn't the only outcome for the illness (many more are left with long-term, possibly permenant, damage to their bodies and/or brains). Fact: this is killing way more people than the flu and plenty of them aren't fat. They've got you denying objective reality to ignore the growing piles of bodies and for what? So you can oppose the things that would end this sooner?
1
David, stop pretending this is an actual debate. An executive order cannot override an ammendment. Period. End of discussion. No number of lawyers who wish it to be otherwise changes that.
1
Fascism is a death cult, afterall. Wtf do we expect, exactly?
1
The non-Islamic, non-black nationalist right commits the most numbers of domestic terrorist attacks in the country period. (And both those groups are also right wing, meaning the right all counted together counts for nearly all domestic terrorism.
1
Because the dems don't actually have a leg to stand on to complain about it because Hillary pulled it in the 2016 primary too.
1
@deadby15 considering the politician who's platform most aligns with the policies favored by the American people is Bernie and he keeps getting called a radical leftist, I'd say you're asking too little.
1
Really? You people are thinking of going to Verizon? Did you forget who gave us Ajit Pai?!? My memory is shit and even I don't forget so easily. Btw, love you manchildren getting triggered by Gillette. Please keep showing the world that you're the real snowflakes so obviously.
1
Meanwhile which buisnesses have been boycotted for an algorithm placing their ads next to controversial content? Just sayin'...
1
https://abcnews.go.com/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/story?id=95836 No joke
1
@hoodaticus kinda the wrong solution to that problem though, isn't it?
1
@tomservo5007 actually it does. It says they should happen in cases of infidelity.
1
@ngantnier I mean, that was a stupid answer to being too entangled in dollars for the good of their own currencies, but yes. Both the gold standard and having an international currency are bad ideas. To do both is idiotic, but they're trying to solve real problems in a world where even most economists don't understand how money works, so I can't blame them too much for making such a colossal mistake.
1
This isn't even a matter of Republicans doing it to "Democrats". It's a matter of the right doing it to the left. As we saw in the 2016 primary, far right "Democrats" like Hillary are perfectly happy to pick up the same election fraud playbook as Republicans to stop real populist candidates from getting nominated. This shouldn't surprise anyone though, as right-wing politics is fundamentally about favoring consolidated, entrenched power (be it buisness, government, or otherwise), and the whole nomenclature of right\left wing originated from royalist vs those favoring representative government. In short, the right has been opposed to the democratic process from the very beginning and as soon as they get past being moderate right-wing, they start actively sabotaging it when they feel threatened.
1
The ordering of that list is all kinds of messed up.
1
@Theomite oh, their kin are a global problem already. Imperialism saw to that.
1
Josue2018 "duty to serve our leader" you don't really understand this whole America thing do you?
1
At least you're not alone. Those of us who go in usually have to deal with electronic voting machines and also have no idea if our votes have actually been counted.
1
I'm so proud of our northern brothers and sisters as well. Hopefully we can follow your lead before too long.
1
Lodge a complaint with the manager. I bet you could get that programming changed pretty quickly.
1
There are only 2 situations that can result in peaceful coexistence: 1-when both sides want it 2-when those that want it force those who don't into begrudging acceptance through threat or violence. Emboldening the right has upset the intimidation of the 2nd, so if we cannot get control back of our government and use the police to enforce actual law and order, a revolution will become inevitable. That is what is at stake in the next few elections.
1
@citrinedragon1466 my positions on gun laws are complicated and don't neatly fit in any standard box (and I don't actually own one, largely due to the fact that I have major depressive episodes and combining that with a gun in the house is something I would prefer to avoid if possible), though on the simple end I would absolutely support a universal background check because of common sense. I'm just stating the reality of human societies. There's not just one answer to that issue, though, but it's important to keep that fundamental truth in mind when thinking about such things as not everyone is well meaning. That said, total public disarmament when you don't have an incorruptible government (which has never been achieved yet) is incredibly foolish, so I do oppose that. I do agree that there are ways to reduce the prevalence of such extremism both through social changes and education, but many of them are long term, and don't help with the immediate problem so we may end up having to use force to buy the time needed to impliment such (which will take decades at minimum).
1
@auntiepha8343 if anything, there's a positive correlation between the death penalty and murders.
1
@tbird4a Tucker isn't a conservative. He's a fascist and a white nationalist. You've moved so far right that any non-fascist looks like a liberal to you.
1
@Milos Radenovic by "magical creature" do you mean Odin (who was later jumbled up with the Christian patron saint of prostitutes)?
1
Previous
3
Next
...
All