Comments by "LA TIENDA Ca" (@latiendaca1773) on "Tensions between Philippines, China high over South China Sea | DW News" video.

Yes and Marcos, the recanter, chickened out.
6
@thegreatdane; Populated or not, China’s constitution has always included the 11th dashline as its coastline since entering UN and as well UNCLOS. And was recognized by the world, until we, USA, decided to play geopolitics game in the area.
2
China had shown taped Philippine’s promise to remove the boat. Marcos retracted the promise. Question, why should anyone believe in Marcos?
2
And india is a part of Pakistan.
1
@AhmetTekinn; You have been reminded that the 2016 Hague court was in session OFF-HOUR, therefore the ruling was UNOFFICIAL. Renders the ruling USELESS.
1
@thegreatdane; What I wrote about China’s constitutional coastlines, were facts Here’s another fact: It is Danmark, not your spelling, D”e”nmark. . But, geopolitic wise, we, usa, decide what’s reasonable. We call them “Denmark”, and it’s Denmark.
1
@thegreatdane; In the previous writing, I wrote in two factors. 1) that when China had it in their constitution, the 11th dashline borderline, since 1948. 2) that borderline was signed and recognized by the UN and UNCLOS and members. You do read English to get it, right? So, If Danmark decides to “change” their constitutional borderline. They would need to get UN or UNCLOS members sign off on the change, right? Totally different situation! Danmark is their language. Why are you telling me the irrelevance of what others wanta call it?
1
Whether you like it or not. The 2016 ruling is not official and therefore useless.
1
@skipperclinton; This part USA, agreed with Pooh bear. Whether you like it or not, that organization means nothing. And it’s rulings are useless.
1
@dongigarcia; Evidence 1; China showed the taped conversation about the promise to remove the boat. Evidence 2; Marcos reneges. Conclusion; Philippines credibility = ZERO.
1
We also saw Philippines ranger give in and waving white flag in a water cannon fighting.
1