Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "The ATFs New Pistol Brace "Rule" is Asinine and Unconstitutional" video.

@Prosecute-fauci This is getting rid of something already made that mostly helps disabled people practice their 2nd amendment rights. It's not forcing a company to do anything. The Act goes beyond that. It's been used to provide brail voting ballots and devices for the hearing impaired in places like museums. It's making sure disabled people aren't denied their rights due to their disability. The access to buildings part is about freedom of movement. Edit: Instead of just reading an Act, you also need to read the court cases that are attached to it. That's how the Act is being interpreted by the courts which directly impacts its application. These braces were first made for disabled people so it's easier for them to use firearms. The government putting an added tax on it would be like them putting a tax stamp on wheelchairs because other people than just disabled found a use for them.
10
@Prosecute-fauci Self defense is part of "public life". Being able to vote isn't part of "public life" either, but it's been used to justify accessibility. Again it's not just the Act itself, but how the courts interpret it. They have interpreted it to include being able to use your rights. They consider your rights part of "public life". Yes it could be used. Given the current climate of oppressed and oppressor and not wanting to anger the mob, it's a completely justifiable argument. It's how a ban on plastic straws was avoided. I don't think you understand as an able bodied person what those braces do. They stabilize the gun making it much easier for a person with strength issues to protect themselves which self defense is one of the most important rights we've got. It's so important the courts have ruled you have the right to it against the police/government.
2