Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "The J6 Committee Finally Ends, With a Dull, Empty Thud" video.

@thilli1859 Is your reading comprehension 3rd grade? The comment was "If it's not a court and has legal authority". So you agree that it circumvents the Constitutional rights of the accused then since you agree it's not a court.
15
@thilli1859 Says the person that doesn't even know rules of making a legal committee like this. You first. Civics is important. Learn it. Even the court has found that the J6 people were being subjected to cruel and unusual punishment and inhumane conditions. They've been held in solitary confinement for years now and had their water turned off for days and subjected to torture. Most are being held on trespassing charges, a misdemeanor. I don't care what side you're on politically, your fellow citizens being treated like that should be an outrage. We'd never stand for it for even serial killers.
4
@BaronSterling They've already made clear they didn't even watch the video judging other comments. They also don't have a clue how Congress works or committees while trying to say others don't.
4
@settame1 Not entirely. Terrorism is a federal crime and they attacked federal buildings.
3
@thilli1859 The real courts said he doesn't have to testify so it legally can't be obstruction. Did you sleep through the real cases?
3
@thilli1859 Yes people were prevented from testifying. You didn't even watch the video you're commenting on clearly because he goes over that. An example is the female agent that claimed Trump tried to grab the wheel. The two people that were there, she was not, said they were prepared to testify that didn't happen and weren't allowed to or called. No rebuttal witnesses were allowed. Edit: People that didn't agree with the forgone conclusions weren't allowed on the committee either. Several more than just the 2 Republicans were referred to it, but weren't allowed. That's why it's not bipartisan and not a legal committee because it doesn't meet the threshold set forth in the rules to be considered one. Maybe learn some bare minimum facts next time before exposing your ignorance in the comment section. To be considered a legal one by the rules, it must have equal representation from both parties.
1
@thilli1859 The problem is that, even according to the FBI, there was no insurrection. So you can't aid and abet something that didn't occur. The committee has also been busted fabricating evidence. You would know that if you didn't get your news from biased talking heads. You're someone that would find a person guilty even if the police admit to planting evidence.
1