Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "Clownfish TV"
channel.
-
160
-
47
-
41
-
33
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
26
-
25
-
24
-
23
-
21
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@andrehashimoto8056 I'm sorry, when was the last time any business did anything because of "Puritan" right wingers? I was born in the 70s and can't think of a single real instance. They would complain, but no company ever canceled, changed, or removed a product because of them. No concerts were canceled, no art shows closed, no music unpublished, no game unsold.
Edit: Everyone points to the satanic panic, which was done by Democrats also (PMRC). Yet, I could go to any big bookstore and purchase D&D, I could get any game, any book, and I went to a ton of concerts that were protested against and movies.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@LB-yg2br No they aren't. I believe they mean a liberal arts college. Even if that's not what they meant, there are colleges that wouldn't fall into that category like technical schools and such. In my home state there's a college that's free, but everyone has to work at the college. They can work in agriculture to grow the food they eat, the kitchen to cook the food, sanitation, etc but every student has to contribute. I wouldn't consider that a liberal college. I think leftist would be more appropriate than "liberal". It doesn't take much investigation on the internet to find out if it is or not. Outside of a large humanities department, they'll offer segregated graduations or dorms, safe spaces, there'll be protests advertised, and articles about speakers being blocked or shouted down, etc.
Edit: I don't like how liberal has become to be defined in the US. Everything is liberal because the foundations of the country are on liberal principles. These people are really anti liberal.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
My son just purchased his first house, a small starter home, for $60,000. He's Gen Z. It depends on where you live. My house that we bought 4 years ago would be worth over $1 million in places like Vancouver or California. It was $180,000. 3 br, 2 bath, in ground pool, etc. If you carve out California and NYC prices, the average cost of a house drops significantly. Me and my husband were pushing him hard to buy one that was $75,000. 4 br, 3 bath, over 2000 square feet with a finished basement. His wife wanted the smaller house and now complains the kitchen is too small. This is in Oklahoma which has the 7th fastest growing economy in the country.
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@johndoeson1240 I wouldn't hold Greece up as some shining example since they've had to be bailed out repeatedly by the EU because they keep going bankrupt. As for the rest England is leaving the EU because they don't like all the socialist policies being forced on them further evidenced by their last election, I guess you missed the yellow vest movement in France which has had to cut back it's programs due to mass immigration, Canada's PM just pushed the Great Reset in a speech which is "you'll own nothing and be happy" after he used the pandemic to recess the legislature so he could pass laws that would never get through otherwise like a dictator. At least ya'll have stopped pushing Sweden since they came out and schooled you. BTW, 40% of the Democratic party is far leftist, so hardly the tiny amount you're claiming. Everyone knows when the right goes too far and calls it out, we don't seem to recognize when the left does.
I've never belonged to any party because they are all BS and corrupt, but the lack of checks on the left by the media over the last 10 years is troubling. That enabling has allowed for violence to be committed against their political opposition; endorsed, encouraged, and ignored by the party leadership. On top of that the Democratic governors that have turned into dictators, even going so far as ignoring court rulings, is enough for rational people to distance themselves from that party. That was shown by the down ballot votes in this election.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@tigervalley62 We don't only have two parties. We have several. The current Democrat Party control of the Senate is from 2 independents creating a coalition with that party. Technically Republicans have more members. It's 48 Democrats and 50 Republicans with the Vice President voting to break any ties. I honestly would be upset if I was Canadian. Trudeau's party didn't receive the highest percentage of the vote, but by creating a coalition with the NDP (and a couple of tiny ones) were still able to hold onto control. How is that truly representing the vote? It means that in order for the people to remove him from office, an overwhelming majority will have to vote for something they don't really want. Israel was in a similar situation with their PM if everyone remembers. I'm sorry, but I really fail to see how that's "better".
Edit: They don't choose him, the party that didn't really win did. So they are stuck with a PM, that according to the rest of the Western World is just a tiny step below a tyrant until he decides to hold another election, the other parties get enough balls to hold a vote of no contest (which he can just disband parliament before the vote because of his emergency powers he's given himself), or 4 years. Meanwhile, I vote for who gets to run and for who I want to ultimately have that seat in the government. That way people with different ideas can run within the same party and the people decide who's ideas they like best. That usually helps keep, not just the government, but also the parties controlled by the people.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@deadpooldan9862 If something that hasn't happened does happen, that's by definition "new". Words have meanings as annoying as that is for you. That attempt at an explanation of his new sexual orientation is laughable. The show hasn't even made that claim, but you're writing fanfic and making it lore in your head. He was married to a woman on Gallifrey and is married to a woman as The Doctor. Her name is River. The lore was he simply changed forms, not became someone completely different. Only in the last two, which saw fans tune out, did he start taking on traits of whoever's face he copied. He's not taking over their bodies so it makes zero sense. I'll explain why it doesn't work. In Scifi and fantasy you're asking the audience to suspend a certain amount of belief. However, if you push the audience too far outside those boundaries, it becomes too much for the mind to accept. That's what's happened. Saying it's "magic" or it's "scifi" isn't enough for people fans of that genre to just automatically accept it. It must make sense in the context and boundaries that's been established in the lore. When you toss those established rules aside without a logical explanation for the change, it's called world breaking for a reason. That Davies said he was going to alienate fans means he knew he was asking too much suspension of belief for the majority of the audience. He's aware it leaves him with just consumers of a product rather than a fandom that will keep it alive. That's why he's set it up how he has. He knows it's no longer going to have a fandom willing to introduce it to their children or friends to keep it going for another 50 years. You're what's called a low information viewer. Someone that just watches or consumes something no matter what tripe gets handed to them. A consumer. Judging by the massive audience decline, it is indeed not good. Like it or not, our opinions are just as valid as yours and a lot more share ours than yours. Like StarWars and many others, Doctor Who has fallen for the mythical new modern audience that doesn't exist. These franchises are now dead because they courted an audience of consumers that when it dies due to ratings won't care, won't buy the seasons to rewatch, won't buy the merchandise, and will simply consume the next thing and forget it ever existed.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Ignoring Tolkien, it's still bad. Galadriel is horrible and I don't think she's supposed to be. It does look expensive either. The costumes are cheap. There is a lot of 3D printed and plastics that are clear on screen. Jackson had some cheaper stuff too, but they made sure the camera never lingered on any of those pieces so it wasn't noticable. They aren't smart enough to do that. It's jarring when it goes from something shiny and new to something they tried to make look older. Everyone, especially the Elves, must have teleportation because they just zap somewhere far away without changing clothes or needing to camp anywhere. Apparently it's perfectly safe for the Elf (I don't feel like looking up proper spelling) to travel 2 weeks alone after the Dwarves refuse to see him, even though they know orcs, goblins, and other dark creatures are still around. The fighting is ridiculous. The stranger can make the trees blow around but the Hobbit is mysteriously unaffected by the wind. Fantasy is great, but it needs to be grounded in reality or it comes off too unbelievable to the point you can't relate to it and the mind rejects it. Don't get me started on the dialog. It's just bad all the way around.
I'd need a book to go over how much lore they've broken and to explain how, outside of names and places, this isn't anything Tolkien wrote. You are correct that they've taken things from lots of different other books and games and smushed it together. I'm going to be taking bets " the stranger" is going to be Belgarion from David Eddings book. Not in name obviously, but the character will still be him. I can't wait for the lawsuits to start because if we can identify where these things come from, the writers of them will as well.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Right now people finally able to say stuff they couldn't are going to just go nuts because they've been suppressed so long. That will calm down in a few days. I'm all for getting rid of, or at least putting in a block for, NSFW stuff. Most just want equal rules for everyone. Lorenz pointing out that one Tweet is a prime example. She points to it having 4,000 likes, but ignores the one calling a black officer that with tens of thousands of likes. A lot have been talking about how CP doesn't get banned quickly, but certain things are almost instantly banned or "fact checked". If advertisers want to complain about current content on Twitter not being suitable for their products, I want them to explain why they had no problem advertising on it with its rampant CP. Musk wants to turn Twitter into X which will be like WeChat, where you can do everything. You can even scan a bar code and purchase that item from it, which I think is neat. It's literally an everything app. You can order dinner, record videos, have business meetings, game, etc. WeChat has 800 million daily users. If he can even get half that, advertisers will come regardless of what's on it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@reek4062 No more than what's currently being done. Yes, I've read the books, the appendices, the Silmarillion, the letters, the Unfinished Tales (not lore because they were never finisher), etc. Whatever RoP is, it's not anything Tolkien wrote. You change the time, the why, the events that caused it, and it's no longer what the author wrote or intended.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1