Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "" video.

  1. When the stickers started it just told us what to buy. The worse the rating the better it sold.
    3
  2. Most of them anymore. Attacking the customer has no lie become a marketing tactic. It’s called rage baiting. It’s because companies would use their engagement as a way to attract investors and rage baiting gets a lot of clicks.
    3
  3. We should all go on there and vote everything to 100%. Those are rookie numbers!
    2
  4. It’s basically bully hunters for games. Instead of individual players it goes after the game.
    2
  5. That’s pretty much how every rating system has ever turned out. When the PMRC started adding them to albums it didn’t take long for studios to catch on and insist bands add at least some language to warrant a warning sticker. Sometimes just the cover art would get one. Edit: The difference now is studios seem to be taking this serious and bowing to these people instead of playing into it like they used to.
    1
  6. You mean like what PayPal did to Erik July? He used them as an online payment option for his first comic. They refused to release the million saying his business was suspicious. He sent them out while he worked it out with PayPal honoring the sales even though he didn’t have the money. It took months to finally get them to release it.
    1
  7. We need t-shirts. 100% toxicity rating
    1
  8. OMG! That would be hilarious in CoD. Just running around shouting that as you off everybody.
    1
  9. Pal World 100% toxic. Just forget you can only play with people you invite. Now that I think about it it’s been awhile since an open lobby game came out that wasn’t a franchise one.
    1
  10. If it works like every other labeling system has, the worse the ratings the better the sales.
    1
  11. It’s screaming for a challenge like that and you know how much gamers love a challenge unlike the journalists.
    1