Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "" video.
-
@tigervalley62 We don't only have two parties. We have several. The current Democrat Party control of the Senate is from 2 independents creating a coalition with that party. Technically Republicans have more members. It's 48 Democrats and 50 Republicans with the Vice President voting to break any ties. I honestly would be upset if I was Canadian. Trudeau's party didn't receive the highest percentage of the vote, but by creating a coalition with the NDP (and a couple of tiny ones) were still able to hold onto control. How is that truly representing the vote? It means that in order for the people to remove him from office, an overwhelming majority will have to vote for something they don't really want. Israel was in a similar situation with their PM if everyone remembers. I'm sorry, but I really fail to see how that's "better".
Edit: They don't choose him, the party that didn't really win did. So they are stuck with a PM, that according to the rest of the Western World is just a tiny step below a tyrant until he decides to hold another election, the other parties get enough balls to hold a vote of no contest (which he can just disband parliament before the vote because of his emergency powers he's given himself), or 4 years. Meanwhile, I vote for who gets to run and for who I want to ultimately have that seat in the government. That way people with different ideas can run within the same party and the people decide who's ideas they like best. That usually helps keep, not just the government, but also the parties controlled by the people.
2