Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "Triggernometry" channel.

  1.  @antonyjh1234  Ugh "equitable" just means everyone equally poor. Why shouldn't my talent and hard work to improve it earn me more than someone who's incapable of doing what I do but does it anyway because they want to? We are not equal. Nothing is equal. Not in the animal kingdom or nature that we're all members of. A person who studies and improves their skills to the point they can perform complex brain surgery should absolutely have more than the hospital cafeteria worker who's much more easily replaced. Agree with it or not, they are simply more valuable to society. We know that if everyone receives the same regardless of work or talent, production drops and technology declines causing not enough for the population to survive. It's been shown to occur time and time again. It's only ever successful in very small communities that people refusing to do their share can be kicked out of. To do that in an entire country means imprisonment or killing them because there's no where to remove them to. It has nothing to do with ideology or advancement or anything else. It's no different than a caged animal being feed and no longer having to acquire it's food as intended. It gets lazy and in some cases eventually drives them mad. No matter how many different ways it's tried, the results will always be the same because we're still animals and subject to nature as much as we like to pretend otherwise. Edit: The whole "such and such country has some social programs so therefore socialism good" is boring and tired. It's called a mixed economy and it's what most countries have. It's called not going to extremes either direction to achieve some balance.
    23
  2.  @barrykrishna9981  The own USSR files from that time period say he was right. They were opened and shared in the first few years following the collapse.
    20
  3. Thank you! There's not enough doing that anymore.
    19
  4. I've had the same warnings from people from those countries in the US. Commonly it's " this is how it starts". I'm going to take them seriously. Comparing what's going on currently to how bad it got in those countries is wrong. Warning that this is leading in that direction I don't believe is.
    13
  5. We used to understand this. I'm a survivor of childhood sexual abuse. One of the first things in therapy is to think of yourself as a survivor instead of victim because that's the first step in taking power back from the abuser. It's one of the most important ones. Once you get that into your frame of mind, you're able to stop blaming yourself and stop reacting to what happened so you take back control of your life. Now everything is just affirming how someone feels rather than really helping them deal with it.
    11
  6. ​​ @adrianbundy3249  Considering the reason marriage is even a government matter is for tax and inheritance protevtion for the offspring, then why would gay marriage matter? Marriage recognized by the state is to create tax incentives to make the raising of a couple's children easier because the government requires a stable or growing population for tax generation. It's for the benefit of the government. Marriage isn't attached to Christianity either. This is your own ignorance. I'm Native, and we had marriage long before a single European stepped foot here. My particular tribe also had divorce. Nobody mentioned Christianity but you. There's many religions and all have a ceremony of joining a couple.
    10
  7.  @liannawilliams5210  Chromosome abnormalities (or mutations) occur rarely. So you're trying to claim everything should be turned upside down for every odd mutation that could ever exist? So everyone should use wheelchairs and pretend that they can't walk so as not to upset people who require them, everyone should have only 1 hair and eye color so nobody can ever be made fun of for being different, we should all use sign language and never speak so the deaf and mute fit in, we should intentionally blind ourselves so to not offend those that can't see, etc. This is what you're arguing. It's ridiculous. I'm disabled and the rest of the world shouldn't conform to my problems because everyone has their own.
    10
  8.  @Seevawonderloaf  So women do housework and the man does the yardwork, fixes broken stuff, maintenance on the house and car, etc. As a woman I'm really tired of people only pointing to cleaning like it's the only thing that's important in maintaining a home. This idea that men are supposed to do literally everything and the woman do nothing simply because she chose to have a career is asinine. Men NEVER did that. Real life wasn't TV shows anymore than it is today.
    7
  9. That's been known since the 90s. It's kind of like people saying yelling fire in a crowded theater isn't free speech. That decision was overturned and considered one of the worst decisions the Supreme court ever made.
    7
  10. Charlie Chaplin refused to return to the US because he was facing charges for child trafficking. He'd had an underaged girl transported to his hotel across state lines. It had nothing to do with accusations from the committee. Lena Horne was in the USSR files that were opened and shared after the collapse. She also returned in movies just a couple years later. Leonard Bernstein had a massive career following that time period. How is that blacklisted? Edit: Chaplin's career was already over. He couldn't transition into talkies. He tried and failed.
    6
  11.  @stevefitchett6193  To be fair most women didn't want the things women's magazines and feminist were asking for. The majority never wanted that responsibility in the first place but it was forced upon them.
    6
  12.  @trekkiejunk  Because there's little integration taking place. You move to a new country to get away from the conditions your previous culture created. Turning where you move into where you left due to the conditions, regardless of what those conditions were, just puts you right back into those same conditions. The very idea that all cultures are equal and great is absurd. Observable reality clearly shows that's false.
    5
  13. Yes. A lot of people lost their jobs because they were just accused by a neighbor or something, but that had nothing to do with the committee. Though it wasn't as prolific as it's been blown up to be. Pretty much all of them were hired elsewhere in a few months. Even the people in Hollywood had careers again in a couple of years. Reagan, John Wayne, and a couple others who were prominent reported directly to the government on the goings on in Hollywood and the Unions which were run by known Communist at the time. As in visited the USSR Communists.
    5
  14. Poorer women have always worked outside the home. They were teachers, nurses, secretaries, bank tellers, and worked in factories. Even housewives sold or traded goods they'd make. Baking and decorating cakes, canned goods, clothing they made, quilts, etc. Studies show the majority of women want to stay at home and raise families. That's why many didn't re-enter the workforce following the lockdowns. They figured out you can do it, it just takes budgeting and doing without every new gadget. Democrats and some Republicans openly chastised them for not going back to work. I know what his fear is, and knowing that little fact tells me it's pretty unfounded. The US also has been through extremely similar situations repeatedly and that did not happen.
    5
  15.  @reddirtwalker8041  You don’t lead yourself. Jesus. You’re not a leader without followers. Make choices for themselves, yes. Even then the choices are limited by the parent depending on age. The parent is still leading in those cases. The child doesn’t make decisions for the parents or give options to the parents on what they are allowed to do. That’s leading.
    4
  16. He gave them. The trust in media is gone, the trust in politicians is going, now it's the trust in the intellectuals that needs to go. Without trust and people listening to them, they lose any real power.
    4
  17.  @hannahgitellman3367  "It's just language". The destruction of language creates the inability to communicate with each other in any meaningful way. It's not "just" language. Edit: You can view it as them being disrespectful and they can not care. Respect is earned. If you've done nothing to earn their respect yet demand it anyway, they aren't the one in the wrong.
    3
  18.  @EmperorsNewWardrobe  They can’t “lead” their own play. You can’t lead anything if there’s no one to lead. Making choices for yourself isn’t leading because leading is controlling others. A leadership roll in a company means they are leading the direction every person that works for that company is going. A teacher leads the class full of other people. Those people may choose to learn or not, but the teacher still sets the rules for all to follow. When she said the child leads, she means the family. The child is the decision maker for everyone else. That absolutely should never be the responsibility of a child. I really think some of you are intentionally being obtuse.
    3
  19. Seeing as you grew up around Hollywood I can see that being your perspective. The film industry isn't a good reflection of the how it is in the rest of the world. It's an extremely isolated bubble. So it is wrong to judge everywhere under the false assumption that it's like it is there. That's just not the case. I personally have had far more women try to control my decisions than men and I live in an area people like you would most likely consider backwards and misogynist without having actually lived there. Very red, very religious areas. I have been charged with being a drain on society and worthless as a woman because I chose a more traditional role. A role my mother didn't take. She worked in administration her entire life with computers and in IT departments while my father, who was less educated, worked in chemical plants. I didn't like not having a parent at home, so I chose the opposite. I have been attacked on line and in person by other women for my choices. So no, men aren't trying to control me. Women on the other hand will try to strip me of my womanhood for not bowing to their ideals. That's life outside your bubble. I'm not anomaly either. It's been going on for several years. My family also dates back to Jamestown as an indentured servant (he was the 2nd son to a royal) and before because his great grandson married a Native. I don't know why you added that, because it doesn't make you special or more authoritative. Edit: I am college educated and could practice child psychology. So I'm not a stupid hick or anything either. All the women in my family, going back to my grandmother who was born in 1918, are college graduates. While none of the men are Edit 2: Correction. My great grandmother was a school teacher. I'm the first in 4 generations to choose to not work outside the home. All born and raised in the same red, religious, state. This was on top of running a small cattle ranch. Being told you can't work and everything else, never applied to poor and rural people which my family was.
    3
  20. The pronouns thing at work shouldn't be being done. It's been shown to do more harm than good because it pressures people to out themselves when they don't want to or aren't ready to. The people pushing these ideas don't care about the people they claim to be doing this to help.
    3
  21. If you're talking about individuals accusing their neighbors and the community acting on it then sure. If you're talking about the actual hearings, you're wrong. Most of them were right back in Hollywood continuing their careers like nothing happened a couple of years later. The USSR files proved they were correct and they'd been in direct contact with the Soviet government.
    3
  22.  @marcomarin1196  Which had never ever occurred before right? My tribe conquered and "colonized" 40 other tribes. How about the Mongol colonization? Or Ottoman? It's hilarious to me how people like you and others in comment thread are so proud of your complete lack of principles. Instead it's all "what about this" as you dodge the things you've claimed are the right side of history.
    2
  23.  @authenticallysuperficial9874  Yes how dare people hold the other side to what they say their values are.
    2
  24. Not really. They say the same things. Just in the US they follow through on some of them sometimes.
    2
  25.  @I9s7lam5is-S3tu1pid  What decades? The 80s were very anti communist or did you not watch movies? Red Dawn, every Bond movie, etc.
    2
  26.  @mattevans4377  Why won’t they trust me? Have I done something to betray their trust? Parents are the first people children learn to trust. It’s from that relationship that they learn how to trust. That reasoning has always baffled me. The idea that children innately distrust you because you’re the parent is wrong.
    2
  27.  @djdusted6485  That’s not leading because you’re still limiting the choices available. That’s making a choice between options presented by the parent. I don’t think any of you understand what lead means. Lead means they make the decision for the family. They are the head of the household. They make the rules that everyone else must follow. Leading means you have people following.
    2
  28. Which is strange because I lived in Canada for a year and it was some of the rudest people I'd ever been around as a whole. Nice isn't kind btw. They aren't interchangeable and I don't know why people think they are. I can be nice while simultaneously being cruel. Kindness is kind even if it's not always nice. It's nice for me to ignore your addictions. It's kind not to.
    2
  29.  @jamesalexander8872  They deserve to be invaded and killed? Just like Iraq did huh?
    2
  30. ​ @SuperMarion61  That's an opinion though. People are allowed different opinions. Someone not agreeing with you doesn't make them "wrong". It just means they have a different perspective.
    2
  31.  @John-rw9bv  It was anal penetration and he'd trapped another girl in a classroom and did the same to her. Stop being ignorant and trying to use semantics to make what's happening sound better. I was r@ped in a classroom with other people there. All of trying to pretend like you know how it happens and how it can't happen in public clearly aren't women and are clueless. R@pes have occurred on packed subways often.
    2
  32. That's on Michael's end. He wasn't in studio. He always does something like that to distract the viewer. His headphones will be twisted, mismatched colors, or other stuff like that. He does it to make people pay attention.
    1
  33. How were Senators doing that when it was a HOUSE committee? They weren't involved which is why calling it Mccarthyism is so stupid. Because they felt bad for betraying their country by the time they testified it was all good? The point of an investigation is to find out how deep something goes, who knows what, and who doesn't know. Look at the Church investigation. Not every FBI agent questioned did anything wrong. If you're a member of group that has known communications with an adversarial government you're going to be questioned. Most of them had been in direct contact themselves. Lots of them had traveled there. They were used as propaganda for the Communist party for recruitment much like ISIS used certain Westerners for it. You sound like people excusing crime today. "They had to steal that car because of society" "Judge they were poor as a child". It's never been an excuse for committing a crime and colluding with a foreign government is indeed a crime. The majority of them, even the ones 100% guilty, were back in Hollywood in a couple of years. Hardly the devastation to their lives you're claiming.
    1
  34.  @pinchebruha405  Did who have reasons for what? If you mean the Austrian with the funny mustache that ruled Germany, his "reasons" are explained by himself that you're free to read. As to "Palestinians" in that area, they were never supposed to be there. It belonged to Egypt and Israel gained it during the 6 day war. In 2005 the UN forced Israel to abandon it to create a buffer between them and the West Bank. "Palestinians" flooded the area and took it for themselves. That's why all the infrastructure is from Israel. They built it. Nobody forced them to move into it. It was their choice. It's Israel's right to defend itself and its citizens from attacks and maintain their safety. That's the single biggest reason governments exist. The government in that area makes it clear in their Charter, they exist solely to destroy Israel and eradicate all Jews and non Muslims. One is to protect its population, one is only to kill and destroy. If you don't know which is good or bad then that's your own moral failings. Edit: Notice the non Muslim part. Since you say religion is the problem then you're an atheist. That means they want YOU eliminated too. Choose wisely. If you think appeasement works I'd suggest a look back into history because that tells us it never does. It only emboldens and causes the problem to continue to grow and expand. Edit: Contrary to what you seem to believe, H didn't just eliminate Jews. He caused the death of at least 5 million others. They included blacks, Gypsies, gays, disabled, etc. He wasn't Christian either. He was agnostic maybe but like many leaders from that time, closer to an atheist. So you're "religion causes everything" claim is complete bs. Communism, which enforces atheism on the population, has killed far more in war and persecution than any religion ever did.
    1
  35. Republicans, for the most part, still love the country. Not so much for Democrats. It stopped being about representing their state and tow the party line for Democrats a long time ago. Not so much Republicans. That's why it's more difficult for Republicans to pass anything but much easier for Democrats. Republicans will still oppose one another. Democrats bargain about power between each other to get the few that might oppose it. I'm obviously speaking politicians and not individual voters or members. I'm not going to claim that doesn't occur within the Republican party as well. They just have a much larger number that it doesn't work on whereas Democrats have 1 or 2. Republican party is funny. It's own voting members don't like it or the politicians in it. As an independent I get to just point and laugh.
    1
  36. Sure you can. There's a few writers and movies that don't do it. There's entertainment from other countries that doesn't have it. Turning it off and not buying it is the best thing to do rather than continuing to fund them.
    1
  37. Cities and towns are direct democracies. I personally don't want to be dictated to by California and New York which is what would happen. Like the policies in California? High taxes, theft under $900 not prosecuted, etc. Oh joy.
    1
  38. McCarthy wasn't even over any of it as Michael explained. He was a Senator and it was a House committee.
    1
  39. Same
    1
  40. Social contagion. That's what it is when something appears to spread like a virus. It's been observed a lot recently including kids developing ticks from watching a lot of videos of people with them.
    1
  41.  @DM-ur8vc  People that were GUILTY. Almost everyone was proven to be involved on some level with the USSR in Hollywood that was brought before the committee. That was proven when it fell and the files were opened. I'm sorry but espionage against your country is a crime. Walt Disney testified on behalf of his animators because the Union heads were pressuring them to join the party and give them information or be barred from the Union which meant no job in entertainment ever again. Leona Horn was in the files. A lot like to point to Chaplin because he refused to return to the US. The narrative is it was because he was accused by the committee. The truth is it was because he was facing charges for human trafficking for having an underaged girl brought across state lines to him. I'm sure you can figure out for what. Edit: Walt is still called antisemitic and a sympathizer which was a smear from the Communist newspaper. That should show just how influential they really were. I'd suggest Razorfist's video Hollywood was Always Red. He cites the sources. This was also documented when Russia shared their files from that time period after the fall which exonerated McCarthy, who wasn't even involved in the committee.
    1
  42. Sure it has. That's basically what it was when we were in tribal societies and civilizations. It would breakdown similarly now to that state if we got rid of government. We'd form committees in our respective communities.
    1
  43.  @marygard4608  Inflation, per the definition, is caused by the printing of money which devalues the value of it. What you are referring to is just economics. Also supply vs demand economics in one instance. That's not inflation. They expected to have to combat inflation post COVID because over 1/3 of our money supply was printed during it. Thus causing inflation. Annie is correct in everything she is saying. The reason feminism caused things like housing shortages is because with the introduction of the no fault divorce, a family now had multiple homes instead of 1 because the mother AND father had separate households. Keep in mind it caused the divorce rate to jump to close to 60%. Divorce was available for abuse or infidelity long before that, so this idea that women were forced to stay in abusive relationships is bull. As noted, during those times teachers and nurses earned good money and were exclusively jobs held by women. This is all coming from the US so you don't get confused that I'm talking about another country. Yes men had to legally financially provide for their wives even if they didn't live together. This was mostly seen in the upper class. Women could legally marry other women in the 1800s as well. It was for women who were financially independent because it was thought normal that women needed the company of other women. As for voting, nobody but land owners could vote for a long time in the US. Once it was opened for all men, a literacy test was required. Since most men had to go to work on the family farm or in a factory (child labor only ended fairly recently) most only had a grade school education and couldn't pass it. My grandfather only had an 8th grade education, but one of the most intelligent people I've ever known and I know rocket scientists. Intelligence doesn't correlate to job or degree either. MENSA is full of stay at home wives and mothers, including me. Yes we are told we are slaves, we are members of the patriarchy, we are less than, etc by feminist all the time.
    1
  44. I don't even get teachers sharing their personal life with students in the first place. It's just weird.
    1
  45. She never went anywhere. She's never been an A or even B list. She went right on touring.
    1
  46. OMG how horrible .
    1
  47. Me Too was always run by radicals as was BLM. The founders of BLM bragged about being trained Marxists. Me Too was to oust people in Hollywood to be replaced by activist women and it worked.
    1
  48.  @Foolsjoker  "...the use of immigrants and homeless policies that some states are using to push their own problems onto other states simply to not have to deal with it" while simultaneously talking about unity. Immigration isn't a state issue. It's a federal one and when the federal government refuses to do its job and instead make it the problem of just a few states, those states have control over their own borders. You have a fundamental misconception of the role of government as outlined by the Constitution. No state works for the benefit of the federal government. The federal government works for the benefits of the states. If a state decides to make policies they get enjoy the consequences of those policies. So are you simultaneously saying that a state shouldn't share a burden created by the federal government with the rest of the states while also saying the states should share responsibilities for each other? Isn't that a benefit to the whole or does that only apply to certain things? You're doing what's called talking out of both sides of your mouth. Basically you only want things that benefit where you are while chastising someone else for wanting the same. Edit: Illegal immigration has been primarily a financial and resource burden for the southern states for decades. The states people like you like to sneer at for being poor. Now that policies that were overwhelmingly voted for by states who thought they'd never have to deal with it are getting just a slight taste of what it's really like, they're still not getting the bulk, you want to cry foul while claiming "we should work together for everyone's benefit". Well, taking some of that burden is exactly what you're claiming will benefit everyone so suck it up buttercup. Now that they're getting a taste of what it's like, they will vote for policies that support EVERYONE that's a citizen instead of calling people dealing with drastically reduced resources that benefits everyone else names.
    1
  49.  @Andrea-zm1nl  When was this time period? Not in US history because the largest slave owner in Louisiana was a black woman which means women could own property. Are you seriously trying to claim the trope of kids thinking kissing will cause pregnancy extends beyond childhood and adult women believed that? How ignorant and stupid you are making women appear thus validating all the claims of why they shouldn't ever have power. I always love this circular logic. "Women were just as intelligent as men and were just denied power because men wanted to keep it all to themselves" and also "women didn't understand how babies were made". Two completely contradictory ideas held simultaneously. Amazing. Edit: My grandmother also owned property in the 1920s so not in 400 years or so that women couldn't own property but you're talking like it was the same time period as when the pill came out. Just like other ridiculous claims like "women couldn't have their own bank account" yes they could if they had a job. That was the same requirements as men had. Women never wanted equality. It was always special treatment.
    1
  50. Russia wasn't capitalist. Well, briefly sort of. A system can't really be formed and solidified in 2 short very bloody years. There's a reason it was successful in overthrowing monarchies or dictatorships, but not a capitalist country. You're attempting to lecture others about ignoring previous history and claim they overthrew a capitalist country is hilarious. Edit: There's a reason they executed the royal family, including the children, even though they'd already given up power. It's not because it was capitalist.
    1