Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "" video.

@fuchsiasecret120 "plenty of racist people only beat on someone because of the color of their skin". Certainly not "plenty". Plus "hate crimes" can only occur to protected groups. Meaning an attack on a person in the majority can't be charged as one. In order to do that, you have to find a different demographic than say race to pursue it under. That makes a person within the minority's life more valuable legally than a person within the majority. That's not legal equality, which isn't supported by the Constitution. If someone throws out a slur during an attack and has a history of saying racist stuff doesn't mean the attack was based on that. Unless you can read their mind, that's just speculation which is all that's required to charge to it. The ADL is notorious for listing crimes from people belonging to supremacist groups as a hate crime if they're charged with something like domestic abuse thus skewing the numbers to appear much larger than it truly is. That means when news groups or even the FBI, because they use the ADL as a major source, site the numbers it's reporting false numbers. I'm pointing that out to show that your estimation of "plenty" isn't accurate. Edit: A good example of committing a crime due to racism that isn't charged as a hate crime but would be otherwise is Darrel Brooks. Known to be associated with black supremacist group, drove through a parade swerving to hit white people, but wasn't charged as a hate crime. You can't have different standards under the law based on immutable characteristics.
1
Most likely. I highly doubt it was the incident that caused the problem. It would have happened without that. There are several conditions that manifest like that. A child on a fairly normal projectory only to suddenly lose it all. Autism is one like that.
1