General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Debany Doombringer
Black Conservative Perspective
comments
Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "Black Conservative Perspective" channel.
Previous
9
Next
...
All
She was found to have broken them a few years ago and got her slap on the wrist small fine.
1
@John.S.Patton He's going to be busy cleaning up FDA, USDA, etc.
1
The Capital building is not the symbol of democracy. The flag is. The Capitol building is called the people's house, not the politicians' house.
1
I wanted him to ask them if they think the American people are that stupid to not see it's been going on from Democrats for decades.
1
This is strange since Shatner has been going after the woke on Twitter for years.
1
@joebryniarski6698 That's not how it works. Wealth isn't a limited resource. Someone having something doesn't take anything away from you. I don't know where you got that idea, but it's completely false. Me and my husband will retire as multimillionaires. We didn't take anything from anyone to get it except his salary. We saved and sacrificed to put money into our 401k. If you're reasoning is you purchasing products gives money to others, nobody is forcing you to buy them and you received an item of value for that exchange. Nobody took anything. That item is also wealth, just in a different form. Nobody owes you crap and trying to act like I stole something from you just because we took risks and chances to improve our situation is pure cope.
1
They took over Poland multiple times. They controlled countries that surrounded the USSR. They just used them as buffer states. That's why they were called satellite countries. The governments were puppets of the USSR. When the USSR fell apart, why do you think so many countries broke apart from it? Because they were countries the USSR had taken over.
1
6:56 No. It doesn't. The largest comprehensive, long-term study was made and released ny Sweden a couple years ago. The country that invented the affirmative care model. It says the opposite of what he's claiming. It's the other way around. In some niche, small examples it's beneficial. In the overwhelming majority of cases it causes HARM. What it's supposed to prevent, it drastically increases the risk of. Most people detransition by 10 years under that model. The ones that are still alive do anyway. Edit: The old model was so much better. 2 years on intensive therapy to find, treat, and get under control any other underlying issues. Then if that doesn't resolve the discomfort and it's extreme, they live as the opposite sex for 1 year while still going through intensive therapy. After which surgery is approved. There were no major issues or problems with that method. It singled out the worst cases most likely to be suseptible to harming themselves and helped the other cases resolve it.
1
Most people on border states and those surrounding them didn't want it.
1
I know a LOT of legal Hispanic immigrant families. Legal immigrants hate illegals just as much as the rest of. Even more so in many cases. It's a slap in their face. It's their jobs too.
1
No he wasn't. He said a pardon. It was already up for an appeal for a new trial in the state, and it was denied. It takes serious procedural issues or overwhelming evidence that wasn't available at the time to get one. A few million people saying there should be one does nothing.
1
No. He's actually stupid. Unlike , say Musk, Cuban made a single investment in a tech company that got bought for a lot of money. The tech was worthless, never was profitable, and got shut down a few months later. That's where his money came from. He bought a basketball team and that's pretty much it.
1
Remember her Green New Deal that was just a ridiculous wish list of things she wanted with zero understand of how to do it and when asked how she couldn't answer? Pepperidge farm remembers.
1
The reason you're seeing Unions move away from the Democrats is because of regulations. It doesn't matter if a party says they support Unions if they remove those jobs. My husband is a member of IUOE, International Union of Operating Engineers. They haven't supported Democrats since Obama's first term. They mostly represent oil workers. How can a party claim to support Unions while vowing to put the members out of work? Same with police and fireman Unions. They run on defunding police and drastically reducing policemen, why would they support that? Teamsters represent a lot of drivers and warehouse workers. Regulations are hurting them. Supporting a party just for saying they like Unions is only good for the higher ups. The leaders that are working for their members care about a party taking away jobs more. Edit: The problem with the Teamsters is they represent too many different types of jobs. They represent Postal workers, teachers, railway workers, drivers, warehouse workers, etc. These workers are going to have conflicting needs. It honestly makes them an ineffective Union at higher levels because it's impossible to represent the best interest of all of them.
1
To be fair they're edited to show the worst responses and some are absolutely because they know that's how to get in the video. Same with the ones talking to girls outside of bars. Please stop taking everything you see on the internet at face value.
1
The people voted overwhelmingly for those policies. You can't sue the state for doing what was voted for.
1
Previous
9
Next
...
All