Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "" video.

Because large companies are making their employees read it now.
2
@ufosrus It's not the movement it's self, it's the reaction of some to it. The white saviors are a prime example. This book is another one. It has original sin without forgiveness or a way for redemption. You've got people being baptized at Floyd's murder site. It's based off humans needing a purpose which is sociological based. Our interactions with apes and chimps have moved them in the same direction. They are now showing signs of basic religion by making small monuments.
2
I agree. I grew up around all kinds and made sure my kids did as well. It looked like the UN at my house on the weekends and everybody loved it. I raised them to be proud of all the pieces that made them so speaking about race isn't hard for them. I'm 3 races and they are 4.
2
@titanwarrior4886 What is considered racist depends on the person that hears it. People are now calling Chess racist, that doesn't make it so. I also was not aware something some do now equals all do. If you've never used a derogatory term in your entire life, then you can throw a stone. I'd put money on that you have.
2
@thirstquencher4631 So you admit it's a bad book, but defend it because of politics? What's wrong with calling a bad book bad?
1
@bradleysmith681 OMG! They are so insulting. I let one have it. She was basically yelling at me because I said I'm not upset my ancestors were slaves because it serves no purpose in my life to hold on to anger for something I can't change. I finally told her she was racist for trying to me how to feel about something that happened to me and not her. That whites like her were some of the most racist people because they think minorities need people like them to take over and tell us what we need because they think we're too stupid to know.
1
The fact that you believe we were founded on white supremacy means you don't know history. There were black leaders in the Revolutionary war. My ancestors followed and died for one on Bunker Hill. The founders intend for slavery to be abolished within 20 years and the inability to do so was one of the reasons we broke from England. It was the largest section of grievances in the original draft of the Declaration of Independence, but was removed because the Carolinas and Georgia didn't agree. If what you say was true, then how were there black slave owners? They wouldn't have been allowed to have property much less the amount of wealth it took to purchase them. History is taught incorrectly and it needs to change.
1
@Gubby365 That would be fine. The problem with it is it's circular logic. Everyone agrees it addresses certain issues. It unfortunately wraps it in that circular logic. When your premise is everyone of a certain race is a certain thing it's flawed from the start. If every white person is racist and they can't change it, then that goes for the author as well. That means her work is coming from a racist perspective that she hasn't been able to conquer. That's flawed circular logic.
1
@Gubby365 You didn't read it either because according to her it's not a natural response. She's doesn't get to put up new sociology terminology if she's not in the field. He doctorate is in white studies. The book is full of her personal responses to situations which shows me she's extremely racist. She says many studies several times and links one that's only broadly relevant. Statistical people have talked about it and how it misrepresents some of the things she uses as citations. It's as factually relevant as the paper saying vaccines cause autism. If you want to understand how papers like this end up getting printed and recognition, look for interviews with 3 people that faked 20 papers in a year on similar subjects. 7 of their papers were accepted, 4 printed, and one got an award.
1