Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "Why Modern Movies Suck - Nobody Can Stay Dead!" video.

@thomriley1036 Drinker went over that. There's ways to do it that stay within the confines of the rules of that world. Dune is an example of that. As bad as the Terminator movies became, time travel was established from the start. I mean in the very first movie her son's bestfriend in the future comes back and impregnated her with his future bestfriend. It's even established in StarWars because Palpatine's master told him he'd learned how to live forever using the force. They chose to go with "somehow" instead of using it.
2
@xX_Pokeman_Xx It would have been referred to as another Great War which was what WW I was called. It was renamed WW I after the 2nd war because you can't have two "Great" wars. It's not where the wars took place, but the countries that allied together to fight against each other stretched across the world. UK and her commonwealth countries (Canada, Australia, India, etc), US (later), Norway, China, etc. Versus Germany, Japan, Russia, and Italy. The battlefield wasn't global, but the number of countries involved was. Multiple countries vs multiple countries. It's was the pacts that caused WW I aka the Great War because the invasion triggered multiple countries to join and then that caused multiple other countries to join thus resulting in a large portion of the world's countries to be in a war with each other even if they never invaded each other.
1
@princessmarlena1359 Freddy lives in your dreams so him never really dying makes sense and Chucky is a doll and that's easily recreated. Jason was "killed" in every movie but never died so that's in line with that movie's world. Even StarWars had it within its world, but whoever wrote those movies didn't have enough creativity/talent to weave it's discovery into the previous movies to set it up properly so they went with "somehow".
1
@abeartheycallFozzy That wasn't the line. That was the TV, general audience approved line dubbed over the original. A lot of movie lines were flubbed when they did that to them. It's the equivalent of what sensitivity readers are doing to old books today.
1
@zarrstrudeltributemaker314 There's no "magic" in StarWars. Jesus. They're not space sorcerers. The audience isn't supposed to "pick one". That's the job of the writers who didn't really bother to explain it. Cloning, as per the prequels, doesn't remove the consciousness of the person being cloned. So no, just going "cloning" doesn't work. There's no established way within the StarWars universe to move your consciousness from one body to another. Which means they needed to create one. They couldn't be bothered so we ended up with garbage. They've already admitted the sequels weren't planned out and each movie was them just winging it so trying to tell me to just swallow the garbage they served just because they served it to me isn't going to fly. Keep coping that the precious company you're staning for sucks. It doesn't change facts like the newly discovered fact that all but the first one lost money.
1
@scottyhehehe5367 They never explained it. Clones had their own consciousness. They weren't empty vessels. Being able to transfer your consciousness to something else wasn't established within the StarWars universe. If Palatine attempting to explain it using the tired movie trope of the villain explaining his master plan as he's about to kill the hero in some extremely long way that he easily escapes "as the movie unfolds", sure I guess. Unfortunately none of it made sense within the rules previously established in the universe and instead completely contradicted the lore.
1
@mizu7662 That made sense to me. The Jedi ask the force. So when they die they ask the force if they can join it. The ultimate submission. There's a difference in twisting it's power and becoming one with it. Revan was grey as was Quigon so him not being able to force ghost doesn't make sense I agree.
1