Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "States SUE Democrats For Colluding With Big Tech To CENSOR Americans And The Evidence Is DAMNING" video.

  1. Repeatedly. She stood there and told them they needed to suppress misinformation. That's making them acting as an agent of the government.
    10
  2.  @xpusostomos  Yes it does as interpreted by the Supreme court several times. I love how people think it's strictly interpreted because they can't do a simple search. Edit: Like nobody ever thought of this as a workaround before now.
    3
  3. No because then I'm being forced to listen to you if I want to or not. The right to free speech is fine as it is.
    1
  4. I guarantee more will join. I figure Texas, Florida, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Mississippi, and several more. They 26 to go against Roe v Wade. 30 states are currently under Republican control so it's very possible.
    1
  5. They didn't do anything really other than a strongly worded letter, other than Washington. None of them were in direct conflict during the war. No "every police officer" should not be in the gallows because not all of them enforced unconstitutional laws. Plus the founders didn't send anyone to the gallows. This isn't France or a communist revolution. The two armies fought each other just like any other war.
    1
  6. It's not. If that email got turned over during the Fauci investigation by Congress, that's the proof needed to get to discovery. There's little doubt there will be communications found that will only strengthen the case.
    1
  7. Somebody didn't watch the video or read the Twitter thread. It lays out several examples.
    1
  8. If they have the emails from Fauci then that's solid grounds for it to go to discovery. I imagine they'll dig up a bunch of that then to strengthen the case.
    1
  9. It already does. If they do that, it's called acting as an agent of the government. That puts them under the same regulations as any government agency. This is to try to discover through warrants that they'll make, if that's happened.
    1
  10. Yep. This is to get to discovery which will bring the proof they need.
    1
  11. Yes if Republicans retake Congress. That what this is in anticipation of.
    1
  12. Doesn't matter. All that matters is they acted on behalf of the government.
    1
  13.  @xpusostomos  Still incorrect. No matter how many times you make that claim. It's about court decisions, not just the language of the Constitution.
    1
  14. If they possess the email from Fauci, that should get them to discovery. That when the evidence collecting really kicks in.
    1