Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "Trans People FURIOUS That Female Only App Used Facial Recognition To Identify Them As Male, Ban Them" video.

You're making a lot of assumptions about a court case you clearly didn't read. The judgment is that they can't have female only workout areas in a gym open to both. This has nothing to do with anything else. It's not changing areas, bathrooms, saying a gym can't be female only, and all the other assertions you made. It's a very limited ruling. It also only applies in that state, not everywhere in the US. It has no bearing on if a female only app is legal within the US. As for allowing private businesses to segregate male or female only, I'm fine with it and always have been. There is a biological difference between male and female. There is not when talking about race, religion, etc. If we accept your premise that you're either against all segregation or for all segregation, then that would mean every religious building would have to cater to every other religion and practice them within that space. That would send the religious to feel they can only practice their religion in secrecy to keep it intact and not influenced or taken over by another one. It would also mean Women's shelters that help women escape an abusive spouse will have to close because they won't be allowed to bar the abuser from entering. The reason segregation of the races was ended is because there is no biological difference between them. The reason it's allowed when it comes to biological sex is because there is. This is probably one of your worst takes, mainly because you didn't research the court decision you pointed out that you think somehow is relevant to the female only app. It isn't even remotely relevant to it because it's about segregation within a business that allows all.
1