Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "Steven Crowder \u0026 Alex Jones Make HUGE Announcement! A Game Changer In Content Creation!" video.

Starbucks is a multibillion dollar company that has stores across the street from each other. That's like saying Bud light is cheaper than the small local brewery or that Walmart is cheaper than the small business.
3
@jarekjenkins8677 "Threw the Daily Wire under the bus" is like saying Prince threw record companies under the bus. Exposing things in contracts that are in there to intentionally take advantage of up and coming young, inexperienced talent isn't throwing a massive company under the bus. I love how people like you use Jeremy saying they can negotiate that stuff out somehow makes it fine. It's only in there to trap someone who's inexperienced with contracts and naive believing a company that promotes itself like they do would never take advantage of them. That's why it was in recording contracts and why artists that had gold records were poor. Edit: That's also one if the reasons for the actors strike. Not because big guys aren't making enough but because studios are trying to own young actors that maybe just a background character in a production by scanning their image, owning that image for eternity, and then if they become popular they can insert them into anything they make without their permission and without paying them using AI. As AI develops, they'd eventually be able to make them a main character in a production without their permission or pay using AI.
2
No. The Daily Wire isn't independently paid for by its supporters. It's owned by a billionaire. They won't platform people like Jones or show him any support because it could damage the brand. They have paid millions to YouTube and FB to keep themselves as safe as they possibly can from being permanently removed from those platforms because they generate a lot of income for them. Unlike Crowder who hasn't had a revenue stream from them in years and has no large investors backing him.
1
Not in the US. It's illegal to arrest someone for speech. It's protected against the government in the Constitution. They mostly live in red states and no red state is going to allow that to happen. The courts won't tolerate it either. When the video of the law class at Harvard yelling down a lawyer there that was giving a talk about free speech was posted, Harvard was sent a letter by the federal judges telling them none in that class will get internships from those judges which is why they attend it. The prestige of Harvard is a one way ticket to important clerking positions that impact the entire future of your career. So you trying to claim the government is not only going to arrest any and all right wing influences but that they'll magically be convicted is insane and you just trying to black pill people into giving up.
1
@TDCIYB77 Yes Google is very reliable with their results. Let me guess, top result is the reddit thread making claims he already debunked.
1
@emsnewssupkis6453 Yes people give him money. Just like people pay for cable and they have these things called seasons where for at least 3 months a year it's nothing but reruns of things you already watched. If you don't like it, don't give him money. It's a very strange complaint though that you think paying someone basically $10 a month means you own them and they forfeit the rest of their lives for it.
1
@SleepySlimTV The three months free was March, April, and May. That doesn't include July so nobody lost a free month.
1
I watched him everyday for 4 years and he never even spoke about his impending divorce or bad about her at all. He'd talk about her medical problems so people could pray for her, but he never blamed her for marital woes because he never talked about them at all. You've never watched him and are just talking out your butt about things you "heard" but know nothing about.
1
@littledancingfawn It was about shopping. She hadn't done the grocery shopping like they'd agreed to it appeared. He was also in the middle of his heart problems where it was being crushed meaning he wasn't able to do anything physically straining. No lifting, little movement, nothing that will increase your heart rate, etc. He wanted her to take an Uber and leave the car for him because he was going to go by his parents house, his father helps run the business and is in charge of booking. She wanted it but wouldn't give him a time frame of how long she'd be gone and was going to do some other shopping with her friends. So it wasn't just for neccessary items. She ridiculed his family in that clip too. Having been married for 25 years, a SAHM, and pregnant twice I have some experience here. All of my pregnancies were high risk. The first higher risk than the 2nd until the 3re trimester then the 2nd was much more so. I took care of my mother, grandmother, and father throughout the 2nd one. My mother was recovering from quadruple bypass and aorta bypass, my grandmother had breast cancer, and my father was working 12 hour shifts. She's relying on the sympathy being pregnant draws from the public. People seem to think it's a disability when it's most definitely not. If she was going shopping with her friends, she was perfectly physically able to go purchase food while she was out. He needed her to step up and take care of him, but she clearly had no interest in doing so. It reminded me of my youngest son's ex girlfriend. She expected him to drop everything and take care of her if she just had a mild headache, but when he got very sick with the flu she wouldn't even go into the room to check on him. She was trying to manipulate him into giving into her demands and he was clearly tired of it and had run out of patience when it came to this subject. That's all. If people could hear some of the arguments me and my husband had, especially within the first few years, they'd think we were both horrible depending on the subject.
1
What's the matter? Don't like seeing black men be successful?
1
@CarolinaGirl6919 He doesn't own it anymore. He sold it to Rumble.
1
The Daily Wire didn't "make all this possible". Rumble did. That wasn't his only offer and he made that clear. It wasn't even his biggest offer which he also made clear.
1