Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "Disparu" channel.

  1. 40
  2. 31
  3. 29
  4. 26
  5. 25
  6. 21
  7. 20
  8. 20
  9. 19
  10. 19
  11. 19
  12. 18
  13. 18
  14. 18
  15. 14
  16. 13
  17. 12
  18. 12
  19. 11
  20. 11
  21. 10
  22. 10
  23. 9
  24. 9
  25. 9
  26. 9
  27. 8
  28. 8
  29. 8
  30. 8
  31. 8
  32. 8
  33. 7
  34. 7
  35. 7
  36. 6
  37. 6
  38. 6
  39. 6
  40. 6
  41. 6
  42. 5
  43. 5
  44. 5
  45. 5
  46. 5
  47. 5
  48. 5
  49. 5
  50. 5
  51.  @MatthewCYN15  The Pandorica The Doctor says a lot of things. This is actions, not words. You've never said something in anger but didn't act on it? Everyone has which is the point of things like that in the scripts. To make him relatable. Time Lord Victorious was way more than just that. It was predicted to the 4th Doctor by the Dalek that he would become everything he opposed. Proving the point of the comment. It was undone when the Eleventh reset all the fixed points in time during the Pandorica arch. Twelfth Doctor threatened that but did not do it. Instead he told her, Me is the name btw, to stay far away from him. He then brought Clara back (sort of) and she's out of time traveling with Me. The only time The Doctor eliminated an entire race was the Daleks which he swore to never do again. He was forced to kill but it was always with great regret. Even in the Time Lord Victorious he allowed a few to escape intentionally. People are allowed to comment as much as they like about the recent seemingly permanent development of a lack of empathy from the 2 most recent attempts at The Doctor. There's a reason the ratings took a nose dive and are continuing to drop regardless of Tenant's and RTD's return. I find it interesting that you only mention him changing a fixed point in time in the Victorious arch but not the much more heinous acts he committed. Like destroying an entire planet and creating a time rift and time loops. He didn't have a companion because he didn't want one. All The Doctor's companions have tragic lives except 1 or 2 across the entire 50 years. He couldn't stand the thought of condemning another person to that fate for a brief time. That reminded him of why he had them in the first place. To keep himself grounded and empathetic. Edit: Even though you claim to have portrayed The Doctor in audio shows (not cannon btw), you have zero grasp or understanding of the character. Not surprising. I've been told by those that work with them that actors are pretty stupid and surface level. Thanks for proving it true.
    5
  52. 5
  53. 4
  54. 4
  55. 4
  56. 4
  57. 4
  58. 4
  59. 4
  60. 4
  61. 4
  62. 4
  63. 4
  64. 4
  65. 4
  66. 4
  67. 4
  68. 4
  69. 3
  70. 3
  71.  @reek4062  Yes, stuff was changed which was discussed and debated within the fandom at the time. The majority decided that despite the changes, it was the best representation of Tolkien's work that likely will ever be made. Jackson addressed and explained most of the changes that were made with the fandom at the time. Him, staff, and Sir Ian Mckellen all communicated with us via message boards and blogs during production and after release. The books say Faramir interrogates Gollum rather than kill him for fishing in the Frobidden Pool (entrance to Henneth Annun). It's not unreasonable to assume an interrogation would involve some pressure. That's not "abuse" especially since he should be killed as his proper punishment. Faramir may have been wise and kind, but it didn't mean he didn't perform his duty. The Mouth of Sauron scene is only in the extended editions so if they don't have those, that is unknown to them and only a part cut for time (which it was). Frodo sending Sam away (not Sam leaving Frodo) was highly contested along with removing Tom, and not doing the Scouring of the Shire. The last two were removed for times sake and Frodo sending Sam away didn't change what ultimately occurred as a result of entering Cirith Ungol. These are things, that though debated within the fandom, doesn't take away someone's fan card nor does it call for degrading other fans who love the movies simply because someone else disagrees. That's not how this fandom works because just reading and understanding Tolkien's work requires an intelligence that behaving that way, is frankly, beneath us.
    3
  72. 3
  73. 3
  74. 3
  75. 3
  76. 3
  77. 3
  78. 3
  79. 3
  80. 3
  81. 3
  82. 3
  83. 3
  84. 3
  85. 3
  86. 3
  87. 3
  88. 3
  89. 3
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107. 2
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 2
  117. 2
  118. 2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. 2
  122. 2
  123. 2
  124. 2
  125. 2
  126. 2
  127. 2
  128. 2
  129. 2
  130. 2
  131. 2
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134. 2
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171.  @chrissgchriss  That's not true. Actors just want to act. They love death scenes. Very few actors give a crap about the character they're portraying. Leonard Nemo famously was thrilled when they killed Spock because he got to act out a death scene. It was only later that he realized how much it damaged the character and the fans that he understood the importance of the character. To them it's just a role. The Rock cares because he's been a character his entire life as was his father and because it was in wrestling he has a different view. How his character acted directly impacted his fans which in wrestling are who makes you money. So he always understood the relationship with fans. This is why they say Tom Cruise is the last movie star. He's the only actor people will go see a movie because he's in it. He's cultivated a fan base and been careful with his character choices. Most actors don't do that. Certainly very few younger ones. Used to actors were much more concerned with how they were perceived by the audience from role to role. Now they only care if a role is going to let them do something they like to do. Edit: Patrick Stewart is a good example. Even though he's played Picard for years, he doesn't care about the character at all. His main concern is being able to act in away he hasn't before. If that means that character acts completely differently than he would before, that's a bonus to him. They only care about showcasing their abilities, not who the character is supposed to be.
    1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1