Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "" video.

I also can relate. I got put in remedial reading in 3rd grade while I was reading Shakespeare at home. My grandfather collected anthologies of classical writers. He had Dickens, Twain, Shakespeare, etc and I'd read them and understand them for the most part. This was before they'd split the class up into groups of different reading levels like they do now. I was bored out of my mind. That teacher hated me for some reason and enjoyed announcing to the class she was putting me in it. Edit: I was only in it a few weeks, but stuff like that seriously messes you up when you're young.
26
IQ is potential. Take me as an example. Heck, most of my family. We all range between 130-150 IQ. None of us have been scientists, have invented something, or done anything special. My oldest is 160+ IQ. He works in operations at an oil refinery. My IQ is 138. My contribution is being a stay at home wife and mother. We've all preferred hands-on type work. So we've all been farmers, ranchers, gardeners (I'm a master gardener and enjoy design), carpenters, etc, and very knowledgeable in those areas. When we do find something that piques our interest, we'll read everything we can find on it. Studying and learning about it like we're getting a masters degree in it. We end up with vast amounts of knowledge in various areas outside whatever we've chosen to earn money doing. We've all been creative in one way or another. Both of my sons are musically gifted and could have gone into it professionally. I'm into fabric art and crafting and work at expanding my skills in areas adjacent to that. My mother loved interior design and all forms of decoration (cakes, knicknacks, ceramics, etc). Both my grandfather and father loved woodworking and building things. Those are the skills we'd work on and master outside work. Continously improving our skills in them. That's basically what the majority of higher IQ people do because it's not about making money. It's about learning and improving our knowledge and skills in whatever area we enjoy. Sorry for the book, but I was trying to sort of explain in detail using my own high IQ family as an example of how it typically functions in the real world.
26
That's why it said a credible source. Then they choose whichever "source" aligns with their belief. If your source is based on a good study, they'll reject it based off of where it came from. Even if it came from an institution they'll use when the results align with their beliefs.
16
You mean like the lab leak? No! Say it ain't so!
11
I didn't watch the full thing, but from what I have seen, Ethan was doing well in exposing that Hasan is a bad person which was his goal. I don't care for either, but I'll pick Ethan over Hasan.
7
 @dansmith1661 Ethan agrees with him about Isreal vs Palestine so that's irrelevant when it comes the two of them.
4
@doriXslurr As a lawyer, he should have been aware that was eventually going to happen. A court decision that's spun a right out of whole cloth won't stand forever. The left's holy RGB warned Democrats every time they were in a position to pass it into law of that fact. Unfortunately for them, it was too good of an issue for fundraising so they didn't. Now that it's back at the state level it's been funny watching it no longer be as big a driver.
1
@TheresNoFreeUsername What does meritocracy have to with the comment? Eugenics happens everywhere in nature. Females choose a mate based on what traits they want in their offspring. That's all it is. Breeding based on traits that will improve the species. We still practice it, we just don't call it that. Right now if you have enough money you can choose hair and eye color of your child using IVF. You can also screen out any genes that increase the risk of certain diseases. Heck, aborting fetuses with Down Syndrome is a form of it. Edit: A prime example is I think it was Sweden proudly announcing to the world they'd found a cure for Down Syndrome. The "cure" was aborting every baby with it. Eugenics.
1
Point to Clinton firing over 300,000 federal workers almost immediately when he took office back when the government bureaucracy was much smaller. And that Obama set up what is now DOGE to do what Trump is doing. Edit: Clinton also put in similar welfare reform. Only he went further. If you were getting benefits and already had 2 children, if you had another you wouldn't receive additional benefits.
1
You just outed yourself as one. IQ is simply how quickly and accurately someone can solve logic problems and recognize patterns. All of those are an indicator of potential. They have the potential to make a contribution to increasing human knowledge. It doesn't mean they will. Most people with high IQ lack the ambition to do it and simply enjoy learning and mastering things. Passing on that potential to their offspring. Edit: It's a measure of their ability to quickly learn and understand things. It's considered a learning disability finally because they don't learn like the majority does. Since public education is geared to teaching the majority of people, it's not effective in teaching those above or below the norm.
1
@Bramandin Hasan is the midwit. Ethan freely admits he's not very intelligent. Hasan pretends to be. This video is about how midwits believe themselves to be intelligent when they're not. Ethan doesn't fit that definition. Edit: Hasan has gotten destroyed in every debate he's ever done which is why he doesn't do them. He thought Ethan was so far below him that he could manipulate him and control the topics. He failed again.
1