Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "Actual Justice Warrior" channel.

  1. 102
  2. 84
  3. 58
  4. 58
  5. 46
  6. 44
  7. 40
  8. 38
  9. 38
  10. 35
  11. 33
  12. 31
  13. 29
  14. 27
  15. 26
  16. 25
  17. 24
  18. 22
  19. 22
  20. 22
  21. 22
  22. 21
  23. 21
  24. 19
  25. 19
  26. 18
  27. 18
  28. 18
  29. 17
  30. 17
  31. 17
  32. 16
  33. 16
  34. 15
  35. 15
  36. 15
  37. 15
  38. 15
  39. 15
  40. 15
  41. 14
  42. 14
  43. 14
  44. 14
  45. 14
  46. 14
  47. 13
  48. 13
  49. 13
  50. 13
  51. 13
  52. 13
  53. 13
  54. 12
  55. 12
  56. 12
  57. 12
  58. 12
  59. 11
  60. 11
  61. 11
  62. 11
  63. 11
  64. 11
  65. 10
  66. 10
  67. 10
  68. 10
  69. 10
  70. 10
  71. 10
  72. 10
  73. 10
  74. 10
  75. 9
  76. 9
  77. 9
  78. 9
  79. 9
  80. 9
  81. 9
  82. 9
  83. 9
  84. 9
  85. 9
  86. 9
  87. 9
  88. 9
  89. 9
  90. 9
  91. 8
  92. 8
  93. 8
  94. 8
  95. 8
  96. 8
  97. 8
  98. 8
  99. 8
  100. 8
  101. 8
  102. 8
  103. 8
  104. 8
  105. 8
  106. 8
  107. 8
  108. 7
  109. 7
  110. 7
  111. 7
  112. 7
  113. 7
  114. 7
  115. 7
  116. 7
  117. 7
  118. 7
  119. 7
  120. 7
  121. 7
  122. 7
  123. 6
  124. 6
  125. 6
  126. 6
  127. 6
  128. 6
  129. 6
  130. 6
  131. 6
  132. 6
  133. 6
  134. 6
  135. 6
  136. 6
  137. 6
  138. 6
  139. 6
  140. 6
  141. 6
  142. 6
  143. 6
  144. 6
  145. 6
  146. 6
  147. 6
  148. 6
  149. 5
  150. 5
  151. 5
  152. 5
  153. 5
  154. 5
  155. 5
  156. 5
  157. 5
  158. 5
  159. 5
  160. 5
  161. 5
  162. 5
  163. 5
  164. 5
  165. 5
  166. 5
  167. 5
  168. 5
  169. 5
  170. 5
  171. 5
  172. 5
  173. 5
  174. 5
  175. 5
  176. 5
  177. 5
  178. 5
  179. 5
  180. 5
  181. 5
  182. 5
  183. 5
  184. 5
  185. 5
  186. 5
  187. 5
  188. 5
  189. 4
  190. 4
  191. 4
  192. 4
  193. 4
  194. 4
  195. 4
  196. 4
  197. 4
  198. 4
  199. 4
  200. 4
  201. 4
  202. 4
  203. 4
  204. 4
  205. 4
  206. 4
  207. 4
  208. 4
  209. 4
  210. 4
  211. 4
  212. 4
  213. 4
  214. 4
  215. 4
  216. 4
  217. 4
  218. 4
  219. 4
  220. 4
  221. 4
  222. 4
  223. 4
  224. 4
  225. 4
  226. 4
  227. 4
  228. 4
  229. 4
  230. 4
  231. 4
  232. 4
  233. The best the Fellowship (it's what the fandom is called) can figure out, it's Finrod. Angered and Aegnor died fighting Morgoth. Finrod is the only one associated with Sauron and Middle Earth. His kingdom was in the mountains, instead of the Woodlands like most Elves. He was close to the Easterling where Sauron was creating his armies. Because he was in the mountains, they were near Dwarves. The Dwarves saved his life do he owed them a life debt. Him and some companions magically disguised themselves as orcs and infiltrated Sauron's forces. Sauron showed up and could see through the disguises. Finrod almost defeated Sauron right then, but got injured by a werewolf. He defeated the werewolf, but succumbed to his injuries. Thus he had fulfilled his life debt because he died protecting the Dwarves. So there was no "mission" for her to complete. It also looks like that's not at all how he's going to die, which is a lot of people's favorite story. The snow scene is the Elves that were banished to Middle Earth for taking part in the Kinslaying. She certainly didn't lead the crossing as all families involved were removed so it would be hundreds if not thousands. Certainly not that small number shown. Given that that was what remained of her family members crossing or members that followed her family during the Kinslaying, it makes her demanding anyone be left behind particularly disgusting on her part. The Eminem character, is supposed to be a group of fanatic Elves, which given the nature of Elves is ridiculous. None of that is getting into her having a relationship with Sauron even though in the books he avoided her, Elrod, and Gil-Galad because they had strong foresight and could see through his disguises. Which makes her line about whatever you've done leave it because she would know what they had done, what they were thinking, and likely what they were going to do in the future. You just have to watch the movies to understand that part. That's why she gave them the gifts she did. She knew they'd need them later. So they didn't just not read the books, they didn't even watch the movies.
    4
  234. 4
  235. 4
  236. 4
  237. 4
  238. 4
  239. 4
  240. 3
  241. 3
  242. 3
  243. 3
  244. 3
  245. 3
  246. 3
  247. 3
  248. 3
  249. 3
  250. 3
  251. 3
  252. 3
  253. 3
  254. 3
  255. 3
  256. 3
  257. 3
  258. 3
  259. 3
  260. 3
  261. 3
  262. 3
  263. 3
  264. 3
  265. 3
  266. 3
  267. 3
  268. 3
  269. 3
  270. 3
  271. 3
  272. 3
  273. 3
  274. 3
  275. 3
  276. 3
  277. 3
  278. 3
  279. 3
  280. 3
  281.  @kh8655  There are a few studies saying production is down and it's pretty easy to explain why that happens when working remotely vs in the office. If you're in the office and you finish what you're working on, you can immediately be assigned to something new. That's not an option remotely. That work exists in both situations it just gets started earlier in one than the other. Also when you're in the office with everyone else, it's much easier if you need something from someone else. Instead of having to schedule, play phone tag, or hope they read your email soon. That's the entire reason big offices were done in the first place. This has changed a bit with Millennials, because there was a serious breakdown in face to face communication and they've always tended to rely on texts or email rather than just walk a few feet. So there was already a decrease in efficiency and productivity, but Gen Z is going back to more traditional interactions within the workplace. Plus, you aren't the only person in the workplace and what's best for you personally might not suit everyone where you work, which also has to be taken into consideration by employers. Many people have too much going on inside the home to be able to dedicate time or find an area to be able to do that. That's why it's important to understand that only 25% or so want to remain working remotely. That 25% is demanding everyone else accommodate them. I'm fine with them looking for a new job that better suits what they now want, but also agree with JJ. Until you do, do your job how you agreed to.
    3
  282. 3
  283. 3
  284. 3
  285. 3
  286. 3
  287. 3
  288. 3
  289. 3
  290. 3
  291. 3
  292. 3
  293. 3
  294. 3
  295. 3
  296. 3
  297. 3
  298. 3
  299. 3
  300. 3
  301. 3
  302. 3
  303. 3
  304. 3
  305. 3
  306. 3
  307. 3
  308. 3
  309. 3
  310. 3
  311. 3
  312. 3
  313. 3
  314. 3
  315. 3
  316. 3
  317. 3
  318. 3
  319. 3
  320. 3
  321. 3
  322. 3
  323. 3
  324. 3
  325. 3
  326. 3
  327. 3
  328. 3
  329. 3
  330. 3
  331. 3
  332. 3
  333. 3
  334. 3
  335. 3
  336. 3
  337. 3
  338. 3
  339. 3
  340. 3
  341. 3
  342. 3
  343. 3
  344. 3
  345. 3
  346. 3
  347. 2
  348. 2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. 2
  353. 2
  354. 2
  355. 2
  356. 2
  357. 2
  358. 2
  359. 2
  360. 2
  361. 2
  362. 2
  363. 2
  364. 2
  365. 2
  366. 2
  367. 2
  368. 2
  369. 2
  370. 2
  371. 2
  372. 2
  373. 2
  374. 2
  375. 2
  376. 2
  377. 2
  378. 2
  379. 2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. 2
  385. 2
  386. 2
  387. 2
  388. 2
  389. 2
  390. 2
  391. 2
  392. 2
  393. 2
  394. 2
  395. 2
  396. 2
  397. 2
  398. 2
  399. 2
  400. 2
  401. 2
  402. 2
  403. 2
  404. 2
  405. 2
  406. 2
  407. 2
  408. 2
  409. 2
  410. 2
  411. 2
  412. 2
  413. 2
  414. 2
  415. 2
  416. 2
  417. 2
  418. 2
  419. 2
  420. 2
  421. 2
  422. 2
  423. 2
  424. 2
  425. 2
  426. 2
  427. 2
  428. 2
  429. 2
  430. 2
  431. 2
  432. 2
  433. 2
  434. 2
  435. 2
  436. 2
  437. 2
  438. ​ @bobhiggens1106  Trad is not rushing to get married. He wasn't traditional and doesn't seem to have ever claimed to have that expectation. She expected him to want something he didn't. He complained almost immediately that she was no longer working. Did she even talk to him before just doing that? Trad or not, she made fatal errors for any relationship. She failed to communicate her wants and expectations prior to marriage and he did the same. I'm talking about her instead of him because she's the subject. She's now telling other women not to consider Trad based on her own experience which she's partially to blame for. I don't know the situations of the other influencers she's talking about either. What I do know after 26 years of marriage is that sometimes, especially in the early years, it's not always very pretty and the relationship can be bad, not abusive, for periods while you work out your differences and learn each other inside and out. You learn boundaries you weren't really aware of until a situation presents itself. The ones that survive that are the ones that push through it and instead of building resentment, learn and move forward. It takes a serious commitment and dedication. We had some serious fights early and when faced with outside stressors. Now we never fight and work like a well oiled machine. It's one of those marriages everyone watches and is amazed by. That's because before we got married we both agreed divorce wasn't an option. We both only wanted one marriage. You have want the same things and be able to communicate those things before you get married. I also made it very clear I wanted to be home with our future children. He agreed and said he'd work two jobs if he had to make it happen and at some points he did.
    2
  439. 2
  440. 2
  441. 2
  442. 2
  443. 2
  444. 2
  445. 2
  446. 2
  447. 2
  448. 2
  449. 2
  450. 2
  451. 2
  452. 2
  453. 2
  454. 2
  455. 2
  456. 2
  457. 2
  458. 2
  459. 2
  460. 2
  461. 2
  462. 2
  463. 2
  464. 2
  465. 2
  466. 2
  467. 2
  468. 2
  469. 2
  470. 2
  471. 2
  472. 2
  473. 2
  474. 2
  475. 2
  476. 2
  477. 2
  478. 2
  479. 2
  480. 2
  481. 2
  482. 2
  483. 2
  484. 2
  485. 2
  486. 2
  487. 2
  488. 2
  489. 2
  490. 2
  491. 2
  492. 2
  493. 2
  494. 2
  495. 2
  496. 2
  497. 2
  498. 2
  499. 2
  500. 2
  501. 2
  502. 2
  503. 2
  504. 2
  505. 2
  506. 2
  507. 2
  508. 2
  509. 2
  510. 2
  511. 2
  512. 2
  513. 2
  514. 2
  515. 2
  516. 2
  517. 2
  518. 2
  519. 2
  520. 2
  521. 2
  522. 2
  523. 2
  524. 2
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563.  @oshitomaha  First off I'm not a "bro" and how dare you assume my gender. I just looked him up. First sentence "an American Marxian economist". That's his publicity information so yes, he calls himself that. Socialism is the economic side to Communism. It's based on workers owning the means of production. The only way that is possible is to do away with personal property rights. The reason is the owners name is on the lease for the building, they buy the equipment needed to make product, etc. Thus the workers can not own the means of production as long as that is recognized as the property of the person that purchased it. Unless the workers invest equal amount into creating the business, they should not be treated as equal because they aren't equally at risk. If the business fails, it's not the workers that the banks will come after or suppliers. It's also my name and reputation associated with the product which is another level of risk that's added that a worker doesn't face. I guarantee you can't find thousands willing to take on the risks the creator does in order to have a decision in what's done with the profits. Democracy isn't something that's just handed out like candy. It's something that's always required sacrifice. To push that workers should have that decision making ability without taking any of the risk isn't remotely reasonable. We have Unions that negotiate contracts with employees. If employees really wanted some say, they would form one, yet Unions are down across the board. You can try to blame right to work states, but Unions are still alive and well in them. I know because I live in one and my family have all been Union members. That says the majority don't really want a say. I don't know why you threw in healthcare when that's totally off topic as we're discussing Marxism and how the economy works and why his vision of the economy wouldn't. I love how you throw out "you capitalist" like it's some type of insult only to admit you are one and don't agree with him. Capitalism has existed since civilization was created. Even bartering is a form of capitalism. It's worked for thousands of years and socialism has failed everytime it's been tried. I also am aware of something you and him appear not to be. We don't have a capitalist economy, it's a mixed economy. So all his bashing of capitalism isn't even applicable. Edit to add: A living wage is a very subjective term. What's a liveable wage where I am, is not a liveable wage in NYC. That's why it shouldn't be determined by the federal government. It's too large of a range. My son makes $14 an hour which is almost as much as a dual income family averages with his overtime and our cost of living reflects that. Businesses here should not be forced to pay what a living wage in New York or California would be. Currently our minimum wage is $11. We voted that in a few years ago. If we want it to be higher, we'll make a petition and have it added to the ballot. If people in other states want theirs to be higher, I suggest you do the work and do the same instead of waiting on someone to do it for you.
    1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. ​​​​​​ @jojobizadTRASH  It's not in China due to laziness. That's a completely uninformed statement. It's there because the government creates massive amounts of regulations that make it almost impossible to make here. Once China was allowed into world trade organizations, it was the end for most manufacturing in the US. You can't compete against a country with a massive population suppressing wages on their working population. When China was allowed in, there was a huge worldwide protest of every group, every age, and people that voted for every party. In the US it was called the Battle in Seattle because the conference was being held there. In other Western nations it was at the Chinese or US embassies. It's because everyone was aware of the future consequences of that decision and it played out exactly as expected. Oil and gas is produced and refined in the US. We don't need to import it. What is imported is what's called dirty oil because we still have a couple of very old refineries still functioning that can handle refining it without it destroying the equipment. That's why the pipeline from Canada was so important. It would ship down from the tar sands in Canada (extremely dirty oil) to one of those refineries. My grandfather, husband, and now son have all worked in oil refining. The dirtier the oil, the cheaper it is. Edit: Pay and benefits are great. $50 an hour at most plants plus a real retirement plan instead of just a 401k. With overtime my husband makes close to $200,000 a year with only a high school education.
    1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. I've got to give kudos to Amazon for reading the room and changing marketing right before it starts. It's changed from "We love Tolkien and are going to be faithful to his work! We swear!" To inspired by and based on LotR. Everyone knows inspired by and based on means we're using characters but it's going to be completely different. That means they need to change the title. If it's only based on it, it should be Rings of Power based on LotR. LotR should not be at the beginning. To get into what's wrong will involve some rumors/spoilers, but nothing most haven't already heard except possibly one which I'll heavily warn about. Hobbits don't exist in the 2nd age, which this is based on. That's one of the reasons they were able to resist the ring better than other races. They were a fairly young one. Gollum was an early Hobbit most likely Harfoot, so take that as you will when it comes to skin color. Celeborn, Galadriel's husband, is dead for some reason even though he's in LotR. I think it's funny even Amazon realizes their Elves don't look like Elves because they have Halbrand "a new character" lift Galadriel's hair to look at her ears. Elves should be easy to distinguish from humans on site. They are taller, more regal, and have an ethereal glow. Miriel is ruler in this series when she isn't in the books. Her husband is so, yeah. Can't have a weak woman. Spolier!!!! Halbrand is Sauron. I 100% expect him to have a "relationship" with Galadriel. Him disguised as a human mortal makes zero sense and never happened in the book. Why they think Elves and Dwarves would trust a human to form magical rings is beyond me.
    1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927.  @25taylorkw  Even "common sense" regulations were put in by corporations to stifle competition. In the US there's a case right now that's a good example of how this happens. When we put in food inspections, it was to increase the public's trust in grocery stores. Before that, they got it directly from the farmers so they could see for themselves what they were getting. Now the government is using the Commerce clause to come after local farms still selling like that under the guise of public safety. Forcing these local farms to go through and pay for government inspections will bankrupt them or drive the cost up so much that it's no longer as viable for the general population. So for your "safety" you won't be allowed to buy produce or meat from a local source even though you know them and their products, even though if you got ill from them you could have sued them. If it goes through, in a few years you'll believe it was because the government was protecting you, not consolidating its power over your ability to get food. Not to mention the increase to corporate farms and grocery stores. Even meat you hunt and kill will have to be inspected and food you grow yourself. I'm not kidding either. The court made the farmer in question get the food he was serving his children inspected. Edit: This is a unique case because the Amish farmer in question has a huge business and ships all over the country. However, that happened due to word of mouth and the quality of the products he provides. He's setting a model for other farmers to follow and that's dangerous to the industry. Imagine if other farms could mimic his success. That's what they want stopped because it is taking profits from big businesses and that market will grow to take more and more. A lot of people found out they could go to farmers and get products much cheaper during the pandemic when there were shortages and that's dangerous.
    1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016.  @Sebster85  The Thor movies have always done the worst performing in the franchise. So expectations $ wise was already lower. Yes Marvel movies are getting bad across the board. There's a reason for that. They are based on comic books which were intentionally written to become these movies. Some of the dialog may change, but the story follows the comic and ALL of those comics were woke. The male heros became portrayed as dumb and useless that couldn't defeat a villain without a woman's help no matter how strong they used to be. They created the multiverse, killing off the original versions and introducing new, more diverse ones from it. So now not only are there few old beloved heros, but there are no real stakes. That's because they can't have their new diverse heros lose or look bad. Only left over heros are allowed to be weak, dumb, and lose; and those were only the male huwhite ones. Understand it or not, that's what is coming across on the screen because that's what happened in the comics. Audiences might not fully realize that's what they're reacting to, but they know something is off and the movies don't feel right anymore. It took awhile for comic book fans to fully understand what had happened to their heros, but eventually it gets too in your face to deny it anymore. Sorry for the long post, but it took it to explain that yes it is woke that's causing the movies to do poorly by Marvel movie standards. It's just still subtler than it will be later, but it's still the reason.
    1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1