Comments by "Roman Kovalev" (@romankovalev7894) on "Task & Purpose"
channel.
-
20
-
19
-
9
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
@belluh-1huey102
Are you a child? What is the strongest army in Iraq? There is no aviation, no modern weapons (even their T72s were not Soviet, but Polish with weak armor), no air defense, the morale is weak, there are no tactical missiles except for a few old Soviet ones. There are no tactics or plans for the war, headquarters do not manage anything, all units fight independently. Half of the generals are bought by the coalition. Yes. This is not an army - this is an armed people. On paper, the numbers are huge. The army is not only the number of weapons dude. The army is the interaction of all branches of the military, discipline and tactics. That is why even 10 tank factories will not make an "army" in Poland.
No wonder you won easily in Iraq. And by the way, Candoleez Rice said that the United States asked the Russians more than once if they were going to help Iraq. You remember well the lessons of Korea and Vietnam. And if the Russians had helped, the coalition would have washed itself with blood. In Ukraine, the Russians are shooting through ALL UKRAINE. Kinzhal flight time to ANYWHERE in Poland is about a minute, NATO headquarters in Belgium is 2 minutes, London is 4 minutes. Tell me where you fought with someone who can strike you in the rear and you cannot repel them. The Russians destroyed the energy structures of all Ukraine in a month, destroyed the entire industry. Iraq did the same, right? Your super mercenaries and super snipers who passed through Iraq fled from Ukraine because there is hell and they can be killed. Who would have thought
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
@ArchOfficial
You're wrong. The United States will not wage such a war because the United States fought against the Russians in Vietnam and Korea. Vietnam - 1200 downed US planes only by ground systems 😏 Since in Ukraine they are fighting against the enemy with SAM systems and that's it. It’s not for you to fight Iraq - whose air defense you suppressed in 3 days and then flew higher and bombed. What will you do in a war with an equal opponent???? Funny. The United States has never fought with such enemies and even beats the weak as part of a coalition. You probably don’t even have plans for a war with an enemy who delivers missile strikes to your deep rear. And which hits your airfields and interferes with gps. And never say never. In Syria, the United States is illegal. You steal oil and supply terrorists ISIS, Kurds. To arrange for your contingent the same thing that you are doing against the Russians in Ukraine is easier than ever. And officially the Russians will also have nothing to do with it. You will be at war with Syria and Iran, Iraq. And of the allies, only Israel. Türkiye, a NATO country, is unlikely to support you. And what will the US do?
PS. And don't try to fool anyone here. The Russians are at war with the United States, which is fighting with the hands of proxies of Ukrainians. The puppet of Zelensky has the US hand in the ass, he is not independent. And Russia will negotiate with the United States. And the rest, including Ukraine, is the hair around the penis. The initial requirement is to push back the borders of NATO (a potentially dangerous weapon for Russia). And yes, both sides of the conflict are fighting with the old and trash from the storage. Both the West and Russia. It's just that the Russians have more reserves and production, which is unexpected for the West. And new equipment is gradually being introduced into hostilities. The West at the beginning of the conflict also did not think about Leo A6 for Ukraine - I thought 10000 stinger and atgm would be enough to defeat the Russians. And Stoltenberg shouts that NATO's arsenals are empty. Biden sings along to him. It's all funny. It will be even funnier when the Poles realize that for their sake no one will announce mobilization in the West. And the gentlemen won't come in droves. They will be Ukraine 2.0 with a destroyed country. And the United States will earn on supplies
3
-
Do you have a circus and clowns here? The war has been going on for 10 months - how many attacks on Russia were there? Four? Six? Oh ukraine struck at a range of 300 miles, my God, it's almost a victory. The Russians did not expect this. The Russians have carried out more than 1,000 strikes all over Ukraine and are doing them every day. Each. The Russians had more than 1200 cities destroyed and they fought. They bled but fought. Do you want to measure eggs? OK. Here is what has already been announced from the government. Your satellite scouts are a legitimate target. The accumulation of troops to be sent to Ukraine, even on your territory, is a legitimate goal. The Russians are ready to fight, are you ready? And nuclear weapons, what to say about it. In the United States, a preventive strike has long been written in the doctrine - the Russians repeated it.
According to your data, the Russians have more than 10,000 tactical missiles with a nuclear head. Missiles, not fkng bombs like NATO. It's foolish to have an advantage and not take advantage, isn't it? So I don't really understand what you are trying to achieve. Of course, if the Russians get hit in the country, they will use it. And neither the US nor France will even fart in her direction despite all the Ohio and so on. Because you cannot destroy all nuclear weapons. And no one wants to receive a retaliatory nuclear strike on their country (which will be 100% and no longer tactical weapons but intercontinental missiles) for the sake of some kind of Poland or Britain. And so you crap here - the Russian nuclear weapons are newer, more diverse, more perfect than the rotten forty-year-old Trident 2, which they recently felt and decided that they would last another 15 years.
The Russians will see how you endure this winter and how you fight in the winter and will further push the threat away from their borders.
3
-
@michealbaker8216
Because of the betrayal and stupidity of Gorbachev, Ukraine received Russian lands in 91. Those lands for which we fought the Ottoman Empire for 200 fkng years. What belonged to Ukraine within the USSR would never have been received by Ukraine as an independent state in an honest way. Ukraine's withdrawal from the USSR was carried out without a referendum, without a change in the constitution, moreover, the signatories of the papers did not have such powers. Therefore, legally, the USSR is still alive (almost according to the Simpsons). Ukraine, by the way, has not designated its borders at the UN. In fact, there is no such country. As it was not until 1917. And although the Russians were furious, they endured in 91. 2014. Half the country wants to go to Europe, half to Russia. Europe and the United States arrange a coup, Maidan (hello democracy). Nuland distributes cookies to protesters. Euroleaders persuade Yanukovych not to use force (they themselves use water cannons and rubber bullets in such cases), promising him safety and fixing everything. They lied. Publicly and in front of a bunch of journalists. Yanukovych was saved, he was almost killed. After that, nationalists and Nazis came to power. Who announced the Russians as non-humans and cattle and began to destroy everything Russian. Have you been told that Nazism is only when Jews are killed? Racism is when a certain race is killed. Nazism when they announce a nation of inferior and undeserving life. And it doesn't matter whether the Jews, the Russian nation or the French. 8 years Ukrainians kill Russians in the east.
They kill those who don't want to live with them in the same country. Merkel admitted a week ago that no one in the West wanted the implementation of the Minsk agreements. It was a deliberate deception in order to gain time and prepare the Ukrainian army. The prison and the tribunal are crying for her. Ukraine was promised entry into NATO (again deceived, McFaul laughed when asked about it). Putin said - if a fight is inevitable, it is necessary to beat first. When they saw that Ukraine was preparing an offensive, they hit. And they created a threat to capture Kyiv so that the Ukrainians moved troops from the east of the country to the west. I don’t think that someone would decide to take it right away, it’s stupid and doesn’t solve anything. Ukrainian troops would not lay down their arms because of this. And Russian troops in Kyiv would be surrounded and cut off from supplies. But in the spring, when 95% of civilians leave the city without water, electricity and communications, we'll see.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
First, this clown says that his analysis is objective. Then he lists experts - dudes who participated in US interventions. Then he says that they have been on the front line since 2014. Let me guess which side they're on. In Ukrainian, the answer is obvious. The dude is not saying that the West sponsored, carried out and supported the coup that brought the Nazis to power. The dude doesn’t say that they shot at cities from this plant and killed civilians and children. But the guy says that they fired at this plant. For him they are separatists. Pro-Russian. I didn’t look further, everything is clear. This is a lying clown, his videos are not objective, he creates a bunch of cliches and stereotypes about Russians in every video.
Avdiivka will become Bakhmut #2 and another cemetery for the remnants of Ukrainians. The individual plant does not matter, despite the fact that this video creator farts. The Russians will get it anyway. It’s just that a cauldron with surroundings is formed there. Second. This is the finale of Ukraine’s offensive
🤫🤫🤫🤕🤡
PS. And why did the sad down think that the Russians threw ALL their forces at Avdeevka? The Russians have an army of more than a million. A bunch of troops in Belarus, Central Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Latin America and generally everywhere in the country Russia. In Ukraine there’s not even half 😂
2
-
2