Comments by "Roman Kovalev" (@romankovalev7894) on "Found And Explained" channel.

@VikingTeddy Dude, an airplane is a missile delivery vehicle. Let's first catch up with the Russians in terms of missiles. It’s just that in the West, the entire doctrine of combat operations revolves around aviation. Without an advantage in the sky, the West has forgotten how to fight. The Having cruise and tactical missiles with a range of 1000 - 5500 km and some of them are supersonic and hypersonic - you can even fly on shovels. In fact, the whole of Europe is under attack. Any place. And you don’t have to heroically overcome the enemy’s air defense to strike in the style of Tom Cruise. And if we write anything in the comments under the video, which never shows that the Russians will have to start from scratch. PS. Yes Yes. Everyone remembers how the United States decided that the time for dog fights was over because they had created super missiles and would shoot from afar. Then we really had to install the guns in suspended pylons Ps. Ps. The Su 57 can, even if necessary, fire missiles into the rear sphere at the catching up
17
Kinzhal flies hypersonic most of the way. In contrast to the achievements of the United States in a few seconds or in the fall from the stratosphere. Plus, the Russians have learned to control a body flying at hypersonic speeds in a cocoon of plasma. This means that the Russians will have a plane faster than anyone else. In the future, missiles with an unlimited range have already been announced - this means that a miniature nuclear engine has actually been created. And on the MiG 31, the task of overcoming hypersound was not even set.
6
I see no reason to make such a bomber. Taking into account the development of missiles. The Russians cover all of Europe and Britain with missiles even from Russia. There is no need to heroically overcome air defense like the Americans in Top Gun. And the United States under the hood. A submarine, which is harder to detect than this aircraft, can fire a large number of missiles. Poseidon is already deployed most likely. You won't even notice it until it explodes. There is no point in such a bomber. It is in such an expensive and technologically advanced, and not in general in bombers
4
@DefinitelyNotEmma Why dont know? Since the 60s, experiments have been carried out, some are successful - some are not. There was no apparatus flying at hypersonic speed in the atmosphere and not in the fall. And those that were flying like that for a few seconds. Not everything is decided by the budget, although a lot. Let's see of course. Print more money 😂😂
4
@LRRPFco52 I have always been amused by the unwavering belief in superiority. How did you compare the sensors there? The reliability of the F35 is also ridiculous, have you cured all the mistakes that could lead to the loss of the aircraft? And weapons. Well, what kind of superiority do you have there in weapons? Do not make me laugh
3
This is at 26. In the meantime, the United States cannot even make a hypersonic missile, just like holding out on hypersonic for more than a few seconds. And yes, in 26 hypersonic SR72, in 27 colonization of the sun 😂
3
@jpeterman6178 This is not entirely true. USA. Minitman 3 - 3 × 300 kT or 1 × 475 kT. Trident 8×100 kT. Trident 2 - 8×475 kT or 14×100 kT. Russian Sarmat - 10 × 750 kT or 15 × 500 kT (uses Yu71 Avangard steerable heads). It’s just that for a long time it was believed that a hypersonic target, even descending along a ballistic trajectory, was almost impossible to intercept, and it was impossible to intercept many such small targets, hence the reduction in damage for the sake of increasing the number. The Russians responded with C500. A hypersonic missile was shot down in the Arctic. No one doubts the success of the United States, you have excellent aviation, but goals must be set based on real achievements. In the meantime, there is no engine - it's too early to announce the flight and the finished product.
2
@jpeterman6178 And sorry for your inaccuracy. A lot of goals, not in order to hit many targets - so far only the Russian Avangard does this, but in order to guarantee the destruction of one target. Let's say a million city. Rocket heads falling along a ballistic trajectory will fall approximately in one place with a radius of 100 km where this city will be in the center. And for this city there is no difference 1×5 Mt or 10×100 kT. Everything there will be destroyed. The Russians have learned to control hypersound, and now their heads allow them to strike at different places from one missile. I think the United States in the next modification of Minitman will definitely do such a thing
2
@AnyTime.AnyPlace Afghanistan. Wow. Must be dangerous to fly over dudes in sandals? Or in Syria, flying around the S300 or hiding behind a Russian plane? A little different in terms of the degree of danger. Yes, and there is no urgent need. The West, which is moaning about the bad situation of Ukraine, is in no hurry to let something super new into the fighting in Ukraine, is it? Why don’t F35s fly there invisible? 🤣 And you even removed everything from the Abrams. By the way, do you know why?
2
It looks like Mig 21 without a cockpit 😂😂😂
2
Plat It's just that f14 is a heavy interceptor fighter. It is not designed for close combat. And for close combat, the lighter f16. F14 is dad hitting from afar. The Russians have Mig 31 and Mig 29, respectively. F15 and Su35 are multifunctional, they can also go into air combat if necessary
2
Dude, your hypersonic engines are only in Hollywood movies. Reality is different. You closed the AGM hypersonic program last year due to yet another launch failure. And the Russians have been PRODUCING hypersonic missiles since the age of 17, building ships with them, re-equipping submarines. In the future, they will arm all the enemies of the United States and NATO. You obviously forget that this game can be played together. While you practice shooting down balloons 😂😂😂
2
And against whom should this expensive miracle be used? China, Russia? So the return flight time of nuclear missiles is measured in minutes. This plane is not needed against other countries - you can find cheaper means. And what flies tends to fall. And then there’s a lot of money, people, equipment, and also a nuclear reactor. A big fireworks display could happen. And the plane itself is a beautiful project, of course.
1
@DefinitelyNotEmma It is very naive to think so. Childish. Your unlimited resources are just a government monopoly. When a task is set by the management and thousands of relevant plants fulfill it. It's funny about technology. Our planes in World War II turned out to be no worse than yours. Same in Korea, Vietnam and later. And we were the first to make the bomber. I understand you, you have propaganda there that the Russians do everything - everything is rusty at once. But this did not prevent us from being the first in space to launch a man. And you, with your technology, filmed the landing on the moon in the pavilion of director Kubrick, didn't you? because they lost everything. Have you been to the moon at all? 😂😂
1
@SomeOrdinaryJanitor Bella 1 is not exactly a Soviet project, it is still relevant, work is already underway in Russia. There may be a battle for the Arctic ahead;) it will greatly facilitate logistics. Spiral is an interesting project in the past, many things were innovative and came in handy during the Energia-Buran program. The project is closed. But Buran, taking into account new technologies and design solutions, may be reanimated in a new form
1
Really? Kid, you probably think that your not-so-new F-22 is completely invisible? I'll disappoint you. The Russians have studied its capabilities very well, namely on the Su-35 in Syria. Where the US used them to interfere with the Russian Su-34s that were bombing terrorists. Terrorists whom, let me remind you, the US asked the world community to call "moderate" for overthrowing Assad. But in fact, they were ISIS terrorists. The Russian Su-35s drove away the F-22s and took aim at them. I think American pilots have never experienced such sensations. Even the Su-35's radar is more powerful than the F-22's. It can see and shoot it down from a distance of 100 km. You won't have AWACS, kid, everything will be like an adult, it will simply be shot down. And what's the point of all this kindergarten. You can't create a strike group unnoticed. When trying to do this, if the Russians ask a question and do not receive an answer, this is a direct threat to national security. Do you not understand something in the words that "Russian missiles will fly to airfields, cities, warehouses, bridges, NATO energy infrastructure - faster than this plane returns"? The flight time of missiles to London from Russia (without crossing borders) is 9 minutes. Oh yeah, you don't know how to fight without aviation at all. Invisible planes 🤣
1
Really? Kid, you probably think that your not-so-new F-22 is completely invisible? I'll disappoint you. The Russians have studied its capabilities very well, namely on the Su-35 in Syria. Where the US used them to interfere with the Russian Su-34s that were bombing terrorists. Terrorists whom, let me remind you, the US asked the world community to call "moderate" for overthrowing Assad. But in fact, they were ISIS terrorists. The Russian Su-35s drove away the F-22s and took aim at them. I think American pilots have never experienced such sensations. Even the Su-35's radar is more powerful than the F-22's. It can see and shoot it down from a distance of 100 km. You won't have AWACS, kid, everything will be like an adult, it will simply be shot down. And what's the point of all this kindergarten. You can't create a strike group unnoticed. When trying to do this, if the Russians ask a question and do not receive an answer, this is a direct threat to national security. Do you not understand something in the words that "Russian missiles will fly to airfields, cities, warehouses, bridges, NATO energy infrastructure - faster than this plane returns"? The flight time of missiles to London from Russia (without crossing borders) is 9 minutes. Oh yeah, you don't know how to fight without aviation at all. Invisible planes 🤣
1
Да неужели? Ты, kid, наверное думаешь что ваш уже не новый Ф-22 совсем невидимый? Я тебя разочарую. Русские прекрасно изучили его возможности как раз на Су-35 в Сирии. Где сша использовали их для создания помех русским Су34 бомбивших террористов. Террористов которых, я напомню, сша просили мировое сообщество называть "умеренными" за то что свергали асада. А по факту это были террористы Игил. Русские Су35 и отгоняли Ф22 и брали их на прицел. Думаю американские пилоты таких ощущений не испытывали вообще. Радар даже у Су 35 мощнее чем у Ф22. Видит и может сбить он его с расстояния в 100 км. Авакса у вас не будет, kid, все будет по взрослому, его просто собьют. Да и какой смысл в этом всем детском саде. Нельзя вам создать незаметно ударную группировку. При попытке это сделать, если русские зададут вопрос и не получат ответа - это прямая угроза национальной безопасности. Тебе в словах что "ракеты русских прилетят по аэродромам, городам, складам, мостам, энергоструктуре НАТО - быстрее чем этот самолет назад возвратится"- что то непонятно? Подлетное время ракет до Лондона из России (не пересекая границ) - 9 минут. Ах да, вы без авиации вообще воевать не умеете. Нивидимые самолеты 🤣🤣
1
Да неужели? Ты, kid, наверное думаешь что ваш уже не новый Ф-22 совсем невидимый? Я тебя разочарую. Русские прекрасно изучили его возможности как раз на Су-35 в Сирии. Где сша использовали их для создания помех русским Су34 бомбивших террористов. Террористов которых, я напомню, сша просили мировое сообщество называть "умеренными" за то что свергали асада. А по факту это были террористы Игил. Русские Су35 и отгоняли Ф22 и брали их на прицел. Думаю американские пилоты таких ощущений не испытывали вообще. Радар даже у Су 35 мощнее чем у Ф22. Видит и может сбить он его с расстояния в 100 км. Авакса у вас не будет, kid, все будет по взрослому, его просто собьют. Да и какой смысл в этом всем детском саде. Нельзя вам создать незаметно ударную группировку. При попытке это сделать, если русские зададут вопрос и не получат ответа - это прямая угроза национальной безопасности. Тебе в словах что "ракеты русских прилетят по аэродромам, городам, складам, мостам, энергоструктуре НАТО - быстрее чем этот самолет назад возвратится"- что то непонятно? Подлетное время ракет до Лондона из России (не пересекая границ) - 9 минут. Ах да, вы без авиации вообще воевать не умеете. Нивидимые самолеты 🤣🤣
1
Да неужели? Ты, kid, наверное думаешь что ваш уже не новый Ф-22 совсем невидимый? Я тебя разочарую. Русские прекрасно изучили его возможности как раз на Су-35 в Сирии. Где сша использовали их для создания помех русским Су34 бомбивших террористов. Террористов которых, я напомню, сша просили мировое сообщество называть "умеренными" за то что свергали асада. А по факту это были террористы Игил. Русские Су35 и отгоняли Ф22 и брали их на прицел. Думаю американские пилоты таких ощущений не испытывали вообще. Радар даже у Су 35 мощнее чем у Ф22. Видит и может сбить он его с расстояния в 100 км. Авакса у вас не будет, kid, все будет по взрослому, его просто собьют. Да и какой смысл в этом всем детском саде. Нельзя вам создать незаметно ударную группировку. При попытке это сделать, если русские зададут вопрос и не получат ответа - это прямая угроза национальной безопасности. Тебе в словах что "ракеты русских прилетят по аэродромам, городам, складам, мостам, энергоструктуре НАТО - быстрее чем этот самолет назад возвратится"- что то непонятно? Подлетное время ракет до Лондона из России (не пересекая границ) - 9 минут. Ах да, вы без авиации вообще воевать не умеете. Нивидимые самолеты 🤣🤣
1
@viewer-of-content Did the Russians try to ethnically cleanse the lands obtained as a result of victories over Turkey? Or the conquest of "nobody's" Siberia in the 17th century? Who are you, clown? 😂😂😂
1
@viewer-of-content Do you all rave about "enslaved peoples" and dream of dividing Russia into 100 states? Well, dream, dream, even masturbate. Russia is a multinational state. We have the Chechens whom you tried to turn against the Russians are fighting in the forefront. Kadyrov's Muslim Volunteer Corps "Akhmat". Elite of Russian special forces. Pride of the Muslim world. Go play with dolls. Muscovy 😂😂😂🤡
1
Minor adjustment. The complexity of producing such a tank (2-KV1+ KV2, etc.) increases geometrically. With less efficiency and greater vulnerability of the final product like this dreadnought. As a result, more mass production of lighter and much cheaper T-34s assembled by children and women defeated the more technologically advanced but less mass-produced Tiger. After the Russians installed an 85mm cannon and were able to hit the Tiger from 1200 meters from any side
1
@michaelmartinez1345 A few additions to your comment. There is (was) A - 90 Orlenok. He combined the functions of the aircraft to a greater extent than other ekranoplan projects. Could climb and fly at an altitude of 3-4 thousand meters (I'm talking about a storm). At the moment, ekranoplanes (as far as I know) are being designed to supply the Arctic and to extinguish fires. And of course, you are right, the design is complex, it has drawbacks for both ships and aircraft at the same time.
1
Really? Kid, you probably think that your not-so-new F-22 is completely invisible? I'll disappoint you. The Russians have studied its capabilities very well, namely on the Su-35 in Syria. Where the US used them to interfere with the Russian Su-34s that were bombing terrorists. Terrorists whom, let me remind you, the US asked the world community to call "moderate" for overthrowing Assad. But in fact, they were ISIS terrorists. The Russian Su-35s drove away the F-22s and took aim at them. I think American pilots have never experienced such sensations. Even the Su-35's radar is more powerful than the F-22's. It can see and shoot it down from a distance of 100 km. You won't have AWACS, kid, everything will be like an adult, it will simply be shot down. And what's the point of all this kindergarten. You can't create a strike group unnoticed. When trying to do this, if the Russians ask a question and do not receive an answer, this is a direct threat to national security. Do you not understand something in the words that "Russian missiles will fly to airfields, cities, warehouses, bridges, NATO energy infrastructure - faster than this plane returns"? The flight time of missiles to London from Russia (without crossing borders) is 9 minutes. Oh yeah, you don't know how to fight without aviation at all. Invisible planes 🤣
1
Really? Kid, you probably think that your not-so-new F-22 is completely invisible? I'll disappoint you. The Russians have studied its capabilities very well, namely on the Su-35 in Syria. Where the US used them to interfere with the Russian Su-34s that were bombing terrorists. Terrorists whom, let me remind you, the US asked the world community to call "moderate" for overthrowing Assad. But in fact, they were ISIS terrorists. The Russian Su-35s drove away the F-22s and took aim at them. I think American pilots have never experienced such sensations. Even the Su-35's radar is more powerful than the F-22's. It can see and shoot it down from a distance of 100 km. You won't have AWACS, kid, everything will be like an adult, it will simply be shot down. And what's the point of all this kindergarten. You can't create a strike group unnoticed. When trying to do this, if the Russians ask a question and do not receive an answer, this is a direct threat to national security. Do you not understand something in the words that "Russian missiles will fly to airfields, cities, warehouses, bridges, NATO energy infrastructure - faster than this plane returns"? The flight time of missiles to London from Russia (without crossing borders) is 9 minutes. Oh yeah, you don't know how to fight without aviation at all. Invisible planes 🤣
1
Are you serious? This train WILL NOT be in the first lines and trenches, it is far away. How can you find out about it? Only from the satellite and from visual observation. But the problem is that from above it does not differ from conventional compositions. Its difference is an extra pair of wheels, it is heavier. And visual observation in the deep rear ... well, Russia is big, the chances are also small. Among thousands of trains, the chances of finding it and hitting it with conventional weapons are 0%, and there is no guarantee even with nuclear weapons. And the fact that he moves more than 1000 km per day is more expensive than any minuses. And this is ... something the United States often has disasters, I'm glad that there is no such thing in the United States
1
The Russians have the latest development of such a composition called Barguzin. Work was carried out in 2012-2017 under the Yars missile. The Russians already have quite a lot of mobile systems with intercontinental range, they are constantly moving around, disguising themselves. You won't be able to destroy them all. Therefore, the train is not needed. Yes, and I do not believe in strikes between Russia and the United States. Even if someone uses tactical nuclear weapons somewhere
1