Comments by "gary K" (@garyK.45ACP) on "What Durham is ‘honing’ in on is the Clinton campaign: Andy McCarthy" video.

Hillary is not "beyond reproach" but she IS "beyond statute". The statute of limitations for these federal crimes is 5 years. "This guy", as a former Federal Prosecutor, knows that. You don't. In fact, Michael Sussman and Oleg Derapaska were charged on the LAST DAY before the statute tolled on their crimes. There will be no criminal prosecution of Hillary because there can not be. Unless a prosecutor could prove, in court, beyond reasonable doubt, that her crimes were of the very few with longer statutes of limitations, there can be no prosecution. She can not even be charged. Coincidence? Not likely. But that doesn't matter. The penalty for Clinton, in this case, will be political, not criminal. Just as this informed and knowledgeable man said. Your lack of knowledge does not change the law. It only assures you will be disappointed because of unreasonable expectations.
15
@robertedgemon8096 As I said, there will be NO CRIMINAL prosecution of Hillary Clinton for these crimes, because there CAN NOT BE...and you respond with...this nonsense? You sound like a moron. You are dismissed.
11
@jerrilynball5143 Not "hoping", that was the plan. They used covid as the excuse for delay, delay, delay. Typical Clinton tactic. 100% predictable. Covid was just a fortunately timed accomplice. Suddenly we hear that more people are "cooperating". Of course, the statute of limitations has tolled. Hillary will claim she "knew nothing", her campaign did this all on their own, and unless someone flips on her, they will never have evidence otherwise. And why would anyone flip if they can't be prosecuted? I just hope Durham issues his report without attempting to question Hillary. That would take another 3-5 years of court process and then, when she finally does sit for questions...Amnesia!
2
@mikedavis8314 Me too. Let he pay for her own food and utilities.
2
The statute of limitations for these federal crimes is 5 years. "This guy", as a former Federal Prosecutor, knows that. In fact, Michael Sussman and Oleg Derapaska were charged on the LAST DAY before the statute tolled on their crimes. There will be no criminal prosecution of Hillary because there can not be. Unless a prosecutor could prove, in court, beyond reasonable doubt, that her crimes were of the very few with longer statutes of limitations, there can be no prosecution. She can not even be charged. Coincidence? Not likely. But that doesn't matter. The penalty for Clinton, in this case, will be political, not criminal. Just as this informed and knowledgeable man said. A lack of knowledge of the law does not change the law. It only assures disappointment because of unreasonable expectations caused by ignorance. I am sure more will come out. I am sure Hillary won't like it. But expecting her to go to prison for crimes beyond the statute of limitations is unreasonable
1
@lindakleine1528 No one has been or will be charged with treason. So what's your point?
1
@RobinPhillips1957 Which 1% is not correct? She will not be prosecuted. Period. Was that the plan? Maybe. And was it Durham's plan or was it Hillary's plan? People have not been cooperating with Durham all this time, because...covid. You know. Pandemic. The universal excuse for non-performance. Will the investigation fail? Only if success means putting Clinton, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, ad nauseum in prison. If success means making sure they never do this again and rendering them irrelevant for the rest of their lives...oh, I think we will have that. I am not sure who benefits from being required to house and feed these parasites for extended periods at taxpayer expense. Clinton could easily lose her pension as a Senator and Sec. of State, lose her law license and lose any possibility of ever running for office again. So could Comey, Clapper, Brennan, etc. They could all be sued by President Trump AND anyone else caught up in this...Flynn, Papadopoulos, Manafort, Stone, Don Jr., etc.
1
@rogercook7345 Another one. No one charged with treason either. Good grief. You don't like it, so it's treason and there is no statute of limitations on that. So when no one is charged with treason, will THAT be treason also? Yes, Roger, just wait around for the military tribunals and people charged with treason to be hung. 🤣 Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound?
1
@paul7693 36 years of it, yes. There is no statute of limitations for treason. But no one in this case has been, or will be, charged with treason. Deal with it.
1
Guitars rcool replied: "gary K I heard the clock is at 3 years but still for high crimes and treason there is no statute of limitations." You deleted your comment, but just the same: Your heard wrong. The statute for most federal crimes (these charges included) is 5 years. There is no such "crime" as "high crimes". People are charged with a specific crime, not "high crimes". Treason has no statute of limitations but no one in this case will be charged with treason. Treason has a definition and "I don't like Hillary so it's treason" is NOT the definition.
1
@paul7693 Wish what?
1