Comments by "gary K" (@garyK.45ACP) on "Nate The Lawyer"
channel.
-
648
-
417
-
356
-
230
-
117
-
82
-
72
-
70
-
52
-
46
-
37
-
35
-
33
-
29
-
27
-
22
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
9
-
9
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ellamental7630 Nothing. No need to.
The USA does not legally recognize the concept of 'dual citizenship' There is nothing in the constitution or federal law that recognizes any such thing.
The US sees it as a hard binary choice: You are a US Citizen or you are not a US citizen.
The concept of a 'dual citizen' does not exist in US law. So, there are exactly -0- 'dual citizens' in the Congress.
There may be some that hold more than one passport (my wife does) that are naturalized citizens, but they are NOT 'dual citizens'. My wife MUST use her US passport to enter the USA. The US does not forbid a person from holding more than one passport and is not involved in the issuance of passports for other countries. The US also does not inform other countries when their former citizens become US citizens
ALL naturalized citizens, when they take their oaths, renounce any allegiance to any other foreign country.
Here is the relevant part of the oath:
"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; "
So the 'dual citizenship issue' doesn't exist.
That should make you happy. Right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gunzyb That in and out nonsense (in the USA) is for people who are coming as tourists. Particularly from 'visa waiver countries'. (Visa waiver program or VWP). It also applies to people who have multi-year, multiple entry tourist visas from non-VWP countries.
Canadians, for example, can spend up to 180 days per year in the USA _as tourists_. That is how they come to Florida for the winter, for example. They cannot work or go to school, but they can spend the winter here. They CAN own property. Most of them are retired, so they don't care about working, or they have some sort of remote working arrangement with their Canadian employer. As long as they are considered 'Canadian employees' and their wages are deposited to a Canadian bank, it's all legal. Internet banking and ATM/Credit Cards make life pretty easy in foreign countries.
The US often limits the stays of VWP tourists to 60 or 90 days, particularly non-Canadians, such as people from the EU. The date to which they can remain is stamped on their I-94 entry card. Citizens of VWP countries do not have to apply for a visa in advance to their visit as tourists. They 'apply' for the visa upon entry to the US and YES, they can be refused entry for a variety of reasons.
Every country has it's own immigration and visa laws.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1