Comments by "gary K" (@garyK.45ACP) on "'WE DON'T BELIEVE YOU': Jim Jordan CALLS OUT Schiff For Knowing Who's The Whistleblower" video.

@workout2807 Who says he didn't want Biden investigated? And what is wrong with that? Does running for President give Biden immunity? If you think that is wrong, then simply CITE THE STATUTE that has been violated. All of the officials who have testified have been unable to identify any LAW which was broken If YOU know if a LAW that was broken, cite the Statute and inform those people testifying, because none of them have been able to find it.
2
@workout2807 Being wrong is not lying. Individuals interpretation of what the President wanted are WRONG. The aid was released, there WAS NO investigation and NO announcement of any investigation. You are saying the aid was dependent on something that never happened. Clearly, that is WRONG. In any case, CITE THE STATUTE that was violated. OK, the money was held up, but then was released. The investigation didn't happen. CITE THE STATUTE that was violated. You don't like what Trump did. So what? Cry me a river. Then don't vote for him. The President makes the policy, anyone that doesn't like it can QUIT! You do NOT impeach a President because you don't like what he did as a matter of policy. NO ONE, not ONE witness, has been able to state that ANY law has been violated. If YOU know of a LAW that has been violated, CITE THE STATUTE.
2
@workout2807 I will put you down as another "no answer, no facts, no evidence" troll. Trump didn't need your vote to win in 2016, he won't miss it in 2020. 🤣
2
Yeah, but they all say they don't know who the whistleblower is?!?!?!?🤣
1
@carlwilliams6977 1. YOU said "laws protect whistleblowers..." Cite the LAW. Attach links to applicable statues. News reports and "expert analysis" do not count. You said there is a LAW...show us the LAW. Attach links to the STATUTE, the LAW, you refer to above. 2. YOU said..."The whistle blower didn't say anything that hasn't been proven under sworn testimony anyway". Attach specific transcripts which have been released. News reports and "expert analysis" do not count. Attach the specific sworn testimony you referred to above. OR...give it up. I'll wait. Failure to respond and CITE the statutes and transcripts will be interpreted to be an admission of lying.
1