Comments by "gary K" (@garyK.45ACP) on "Video shows 3 women ram car and smash its windows with driver inside in SoCal l ABC7" video.

  1. ALWAYS BE ARMED! Attempting to break into an occupied vehicle is exactly the same self defense scenario as someone attempting to break into your home. In most states (check your state law) deadly force IS allowed when a person attempts to invade your home or an occupied vehicle. It is reasonable to believe you are in imminent danger of death or severe bodily injury.
    18
  2. When you need a gun, calling 911 for someone else to bring one is STUPID. ALWAYS be armed.
    13
  3. @CantOutRunADuck I am looking forward to the NYSRPA v. Bruen decision of the Supreme Court in June. It will require ALL states to have, at minimum, "shall issue" concealed carry licenses. It will also be a path to overturn the oppressive laws of many states, including CA, HI, MA, NY, NJ. I'm looking forward to it. Aren't you?
    1
  4. @CantOutRunADuck The only thing you got right is I am a "Boomer" 24 states now have "Constitutional Carry" recognizing the RIGHT of people to be armed without asking permission from the government. This year IN, OH, AL have been added. GA is probably just days away from being number 25. NE has a good chance of being added in the coming weeks. I look forward to adding FL next year. FYI you do not need a concealed carry license to carry a handgun in your car in Florida.
    1
  5. @CantOutRunADuck I gave you the statute that you said did not exist in any state. If a person in their car, or any other place they are legally permitted to be, has a reasonable belief they are in imminent danger of death or severe bodily injury OR the perpetrators are in the process of a forcible felony, the use of deadly force is justified. Do you dispute that? Your characterization of the incident as "slapping her car" is irrelevant. It is what the victim has "reasonable belief" of that matters. As we saw very clearly, in the Kyle Rittenhouse AND the George Zimmerman trials where they killed their attackers...they have no duty to convince a jury they had reasonable belief...it is the prosecutions' job to prove they DID NOT have reasonable belief. And as the jury instructions in both cases, and many others, were given, it does not matter whether the "reason" turned out to be true or not, ONLY that it was "reasonable" in that moment for that person. And that must be decided by a jury, by a unanimous decision This video would be all a young woman would need to destroy any prosecutor's case that she DID NOT have reasonable belief she was in danger or that a forcible felony was about to occur. When you have 36 years in criminal trials experience, come back and we'll talk. ALWAYS BE ARMED.
    1
  6. @CantOutRunADuck Feel free to read what I wrote. You're dismissed. ALWAYS be armed.
    1