Comments by "gary K" (@garyK.45ACP) on "Fox News"
channel.
-
1300
-
811
-
762
-
634
-
508
-
326
-
323
-
320
-
312
-
310
-
227
-
198
-
195
-
193
-
176
-
173
-
169
-
158
-
151
-
148
-
140
-
126
-
126
-
122
-
112
-
111
-
110
-
110
-
110
-
107
-
107
-
97
-
93
-
90
-
89
-
88
-
88
-
83
-
81
-
80
-
77
-
75
-
73
-
72
-
70
-
69
-
67
-
62
-
61
-
60
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
54
-
53
-
52
-
50
-
49
-
47
-
46
-
45
-
44
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
39
-
37
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
My son is fighting in the 92nd Brigade of the AFU. My family lives in Kharkiv. The unit he joined last August had 30 men, it is a logistics platoon serving the 92nd Brigade in the Kursk offensive. The men who deliver supplies to the front. You know, those videos you see of Russian supply trucks being destroyed? Do you imagine the Russians aren't doing that to Ukrainian supply convoys?!?!?
Of the 30 men that were in his unit in August...THREE are left. All others have been killed or maimed beyond being able to serve.
They rotate their assignments every three days. Three days on, 1 day off. While delivering supplies, they are under nearly continuous attack...NOT from donkeys. From rockets, mortars, helicopters, airplanes, drones. No donkeys. My son hasn't seen any donkeys. He has seen a lot of people killed and dismembered by explosions. Have you ever seen that? Would you wish for YOUR son to see that?
The training facility my son went to in Dnipro Oblast was hit by Russian missiles last week. Not donkey carts.
My mother in law's home was destroyed, fortunately she wasn't killed, but the building had to be demolished, it was irreparable. My brother in law and nephew are fighting in the war for the AFU. My grandson has never had a normal day of school between covid and the war.
Who in your family is fighting in the war? Which of YOUR loved ones would you trade for a few square meters of territory?
You have no clue what you are talking about.
I want the war to end before my son is killed. Before my brother in law is killed, before my nephew is killed. Before my younger nephew and grandson have to go to war. Before there are MORE widows in our country. MORE children without fathers (or mothers).
You sit comfortably a few thousand kilometers away and decide who should DIE for your fantasy.
I would not trade anyone in my family for a square meter of Donets'k Oblast or Crimea.
Would you? END THE WAR!!!!!!
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Every morning the President wakes up and decides what the media will talk about that day. The media will talk about...all day...what the President tells them to. He sends out a tweet or two or three, and VOILA!, they follow like little kittens chasing one of those red laser pointers. Then he, correctly, notes that all the media does is chase him around on a hate filled rant as he runs them into walls and over cliffs, day after day after day after day. The Democratic party does the same thing. They have so consumed themselves with this hate that they HAVE NO PLATFORM...other than "hate Trump" But the American VOTERS don't hate Trump because the economy is great, their taxes are lower, they got bonuses, Trump is pulling off international policy accomplishments that make Obama and the Dems look like total fools. And yet...they follow that red laser pointer, day after day after day after day. Trump is not a politician. He is from a competitive industry where you WIN by offering something your opponent doesn't. The Dem politicians and the media have NO CHANCE.
As Bill Clinton told George HW Bush..."It's the economy, stupid!"
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Good news, Greg! My wife is Ukrainian. (now a naturalized US citizen) Half our family is there. In Kharkiv. Our youngest son and my wife's brother cannot leave (men 18-60 cannot leave). Our daughter in law and my mother in law, our sister in law and youngest nephew and our grandson will leave tomorrow, they tried to leave yesterday and today, but were unable to board a train. Tomorrow, an acquaintance of my wife is running a van shuttle service who will take them to Dnipropetrovsk (Dnipro). There, they can board a train to Warsaw, with a stop at the Polish border. it will be a 2-3 day journey to get to Poland, we hope. My wife's best friend, literally friends since childhood, is in Poland and will take them in for now.
Our son and my brother-in-law and our oldest nephew have joined the 22nd Territorial Defense Brigade, Kharkivs'Ka Oblast, to defend Ukraine. Our daughter-in-law's father has also joined to defend the country.
My wife is barely sleeping. She is sick with worry. With the time difference it is hard for her to find time to sleep. Thankfully we are able to communicate through Viber and Skype.
We are happy for your mother in law.
Slava Ukraina! Слава Украине!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Remember that until the 17th amendment, 1913, Senators were elected by State legislatures, NOT by popular vote. The idea was that 1) Senators represent STATES, not the people. That is why each STATE gets two and not more, or less. 2) The Constitutional concept was that by NOT having Senators elected they would be immune to BRIBERY and the influence of campaign funding. And if ONE chamber is immune to that, then they both are, since it takes both chambers to pass a law. 3) Senators were elected to 6 year terms by the Legislatures and would be replaced as the control of the Legislatures of STATES changed, or their terms expired. Legislatures would, naturally, choose Senators of the party that controlled the Legislature, or as the Legislature pleased, if a Senator did not represent them as they wanted. State Legislatures could recall Senators.
REPEAL THE 17th AMENDMENT!!!!!!!!!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
By "We" do you mean Federal law? Because Federal law affects only Federal elections.
Federal law allows non-citizens to vote in municipal AND state elections IF the state and locality make it legal. Federal law applies only to Federal elections.
Also, this was A judge of the NY Supreme Court. ONE. Judge. It will likely be appealed to the full NY State Supreme Court. But this is a matter for the STATE to handle. Only TWO states have State Constitutional Amendments forbidding aliens from voting in state and local elections. (AZ and ND)
Just sayin'
18 U.S. Code § 611 - Voting by aliens
(a)It shall be unlawful for any alien to vote in any election held solely or in part for the purpose of electing a candidate for the office of President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, Delegate from the District of Columbia, or Resident Commissioner, unless—
(1)the election is held partly for some other purpose;
(2)aliens are authorized to vote for such other purpose under a State constitution or statute or a local ordinance; and
(3)voting for such other purpose is conducted independently of voting for a candidate for such Federal offices, in such a manner that an alien has the opportunity to vote for such other purpose, but not an opportunity to vote for a candidate for any one or more of such Federal offices.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@UCSe-1zzreVNAKg-Pr_wADpg There is no "charge". There was an unofficial accusation. NOT a charge. A charge is when someone is indicted and arraigned. There actually was never any "official" accusation, either. IF a person were charged and found not guilty in a trial, THAT would be an exoneration.
ex·on·er·a·tion
/iɡˌzänəˈrāSH(ə)n/
noun
1.
the action of officially absolving someone from blame; vindication:
"the defendants' eventual exoneration"
synonyms:
vindication, freeing from blame, absolution, acquittal, discharge, ... more antonyms:
conviction, blaming, liability
2.
the release of someone from a duty or obligation.
There was no "blame", no defendants, no indictment, no trial, no acquittal. There IS NO charge from which to be "exonerated".
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mantisnomo5984 Well. Let's see. Trump won, not Hillary. So, there is that. THAT surprised the media. The media is probably largely to credit for Trump winning. Their breathless outrage has more or less inoculated Trump from this nonsense. Trump is still President, he wasn't supposed to be by this point. There's that also. They thought they could run him out of office like they did to Nixon, or drop his popularity so low that Congress could safely impeach him. Didn't work. They have to kiss the injured butts of their followers they lied to for more than 2 years, but it's over. They know it, they just can't admit it. The media took a huge hit on this, don't imagine they didn't.
Trump will have a rally next week in Wisconsin and pack them in as always. Though I will say that a person of lesser character could easily have quit before now, but that is not Trump. So, no, given their pitiful results, I am not concerned.
Actually, improvements in technology is what killed their plan. Imagine if this had been done in the 1980s when three major news networks controlled the media. Alternative news sources and the availability of information to everyone makes it far more difficult for LIES to have an effect. Comey. Clapper and Brennan..and the media, all denied the existence of FISA warrants for Carter Page. Didn't work, we found out about it. They were living in the 80s and 90s. Propaganda thrives in an environment of ignorance. Propaganda requires ignorance to survive. Any improvements in "their" methods result in improvements in "our" methods. No, not concerned.
The only thing that can be done is to make sure the people who did this are held accountable and punished as severely as the law allows so that no one DARE try it again in the future.
How would YOU suggest we control the MSM? MY suggestion is an abundance of knowledge and additional information sources. to counter their BS.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Nice thought, but the math fails you badly. It won't need many Republican votes. None in the Senate and no more than 6 in the House.
Dems have a majority in the Senate, and only 11 Republican Senators are up for election this year. So, the Senate is a sure thing. They only need 9 Republicans to break the debate. They already have that many, and NONE of those are up for election this year. Then, they don't need ANY Republican votes to pass the bill.
In the House...Republicans have cut their majority to TWO seats. They had a 5 seat majority in January, 2023. They ran McCarthy out of the Speakership, so he quit. Then they threw out Santos, and another Rep had to quit because of health concerns. If they lose only ONE vote the bill can pass. The Republican "Knucklehead Caucus", led by Matt Gaetz, has pissed away their majority until they have no chance of even blocking Democrat bills.
They'll wait until after their primary elections to vote for it. Don't expect any vote on this until after, at least, March 5. By then, more than 1/3 of the Representatives will have already won the nominations for their districts.
Then what will you do in November? Vote for the Democrat?
You are expecting an awful lot from a party that holds a majority of TWO seats in ONE chamber of Congress.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@josephmartinez94 See, here's the thing, Joseph: "The View" is not the "challenge" DeSantis needs to answer to. They are nobody, actually.
The PEOPLE of Florida get to challenge him on election day, November 8. I don't think DeSantis is worried about that challenge, do you?
We will have an election on November 8 and you can vote for the Democrat loser if you choose.
You don't have to like it. In fact, if you don't like it, it's even better! The airheads on "The View" don't have to like it, either.
BUT...you have options. I heard that California is trying to recruit Floridians to move there. I'm not far from you, Joseph, if you want to move to CA, let me know, I'll help you load your truck and wave good bye to you as your drive out of Florida.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ah...but here is the problem. My wife is an immigrant from Ukraine. As this woman is also clearly an immigrant from a former Soviet Republic/Warsaw Pact country. They don't count.
My wife has been told she is not "really" an immigrant because she is "white", "very attractive", "from Europe" and "speaks English" (not her native language, but one of three she speaks fluently). The list of lame excuses she has heard as to why she is "not really an immigrant" is insane! You know, from the same people who say Trump "hates immigrants"...even though he is married to one! But Melania doesn't count, she is not a real immigrant...because she is white, attractive, from Europe and speaks English.
Yes, seriously, these morons think unless you speak Spanish, entered illegally and clean toilets or cut grass you aren't "an immigrant".
If there were 150,000 people like Ms. Sindorova entering the US illegally every month, the Democrats would be using their vacation to pile up rocks on the border to keep them out!!!!!!!
You are welcome in our country and good luck, Ms. Sindorova.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1. That's what "sealed indictments" are for. No need for a "new law". If Mueller had evidence sufficient to support an indictment, he could enter a sealed indictment which would be opened when the President left office, whenever, by whatever means. The purpose of sealed indictments is exactly to "freeze" the statute of limitations.
2. Ex post Facto. You cannot change the law and make it retro-active to some action already committed. It would apply only to violations going forward from the law. Same reason that NY changing their tax law to release state income tax returns would not apply to any returns filed before the law went into affect, nor could they release any portion or any information on a state return obtained from a Federal Tax return as Federal law regulates that and overrides state law. Most states, which have income tax, begin their return with "Adjusted Gross Income from Line 22 of form 1040" That information cannot be released. If NY actually passes that law (they won't, it's political posturing) it would not apply to any returns filed previously and Trump could change his driver's license to Florida and avoid all state tax (not sure why he hasn't done that yet) NY would lose, not only their political case but also lose a BUNCH of tax $$$ when Trump, and others, changed their residence address to Florida. Just like AOCs mom did.
3.The bill would never pass the Senate
4. The Bill would never be signed by the President.
5. What's the purpose? Political games. If the House passes the bill, they will claim the Senate is blocking prosecution of a criminal. The Dems have nothing. Their Mueller pipe dream failed. They cannot impeach but they need to appease their wacko fringe that they all lied to for 2.5 years in the hopes that Mueller found SOMETHING...ANYTHING...even an unpaid parking ticket! He didn't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
But do we?
Trump did NOT drain the swamp, close the border, secure energy independence, end DACA, end Obamacare, or defend the 2A.
Trump DID appoint Sessions, Rosenstein, Wray, Fauci, Birx, Barr....just to name a few.
Trump DID shut down the country, pay trillions of dollars to people for NOT working and paid billions of dollars to Big Pharma, IN ADVANCE, for vaccines that DON'T WOK!!!!!!!
Trump was a total failure. He folded and conceded to the left EVERY TIME he was challenged. He never "made a deal" to accomplish anything. He did exactly what Biden is doing...Executive Orders. And when he left office, Biden cancelled all of them.
Everything is WORSE now than it was before Trump took office.
DeSantis, 2024!!!!!!! NO MORE AMATEURS!!!!!!!!!!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@1aztecninja...Try to pay attention. Read carefully, interpret literally. AFTER the attacks on 9/11 the WORLD developed systems, laws, regulations and standards to prevent that from happening again. So far, so good. The systems and cooperation may not be perfect but nearly ALL countries, including Saudi Arabia, are in compliance with the new standards. The countries on the "ban list" are NOT in compliance, one of them, Venezuela is not a "Muslim majority" country. In the first ban, Iran was included but was removed because they came into compliance with the new standards. Suggesting it does not keep us safe because of incidents than happened before the implementation of current laws and standards is ridiculous, borderline moronic, and shows you really have no argument at all. It is also WHY the Supreme Court upheld the ban. Sorry, but I will go with the Supreme Court's decision over your "logic"
And yes, I realize I just wasted a lot of internet ink trying to reason with a fool.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@VegascoinVegas When Dems want to rig a primary, they support the run of a Republican (or, sometimes, additional Democrats) to get the opponent, or nominee, they WANT in November.
They did this in the CA Senate primary. With the CA "jungle primary" they wanted to make sure Adam Schiff's opponent was Steve Garvey and not the other Dem candidate, Katie Porter, who could actually win. The DNC contributed to his primary campaign and then, oops, the donations vanish after he "wins" the primary (which in CA means "came in 2nd").
Democrats supported Kari Lake in her Governor primary in 2022. Katie Hobbs sister even re-registered as a Republican so she could vote for Lake and they suggested other Dems do the same. The Dems WANTED Kari Lake as the opponent in November. It worked. Kari Lake got the nomination, Katie Hobbs won the Governor election.
So...since the Dems in control of MI and WI have FORCED RFK Jr. to remain on the ballot, and since he really hasn't dropped out of the race, only suspended in specific states, the RNC could fund HIS campaign in those states, highlighting his more liberal policies, or those of his running mate, Nicole Shanahan. He could even make campaign appearances in those states.
Then watch how fast the DNC gets his name off the ballot.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I have many CC handguns, but no .40s. Why?
1st reason...I have .45s. And .44s. And .357s.
2nd reason...The ammunition available for 9mm has been developed and improved far more in the 30 years the .40 has been available. There really is no intelligent choice anymore between the 9mm and .40. I know .40 fan boys will disagree, but that is because they are uninformed. Many, willfully uninformed. My local gun shop has dozens of LE trade ins. ALL of them are .40s. ALL of them were traded in for 9mms. I don't imagine I know some secret that they don't. Even the FBI, that originally demanded the 10mm, then downloaded it to where it was just an oversized .40, then went to the .40 because...that's what they had anyway, have gone back to the 9mm.
3rd reason...ammunition is far cheaper to PRACTICE with and even though I handload, the component bullets for 9mm (and .45) are cheaper than .40. More practice is a good thing.
4th reason...I am an old, gun savvy codger that is not impressed by shiny new objects like the .40 S&W cartridge. Basically, I do not have a .40 because I am too intelligent to buy one.
I do, however, support your CHOICE to carry things like pepper spray or .40 S&W handguns to defend yourself. You may also want to consider just carrying a cell phone to call 911 for a police officer to bring a 9mm.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@anglosaxon5874 They can't. It's called 'checks and balances'. It's a game of rock, paper, scissors and it is magnificent at limiting the power of the government!
The President appoints judges, but the Senate has to confirm the appointments. Once confirmed, they cannot be removed except by impeachment.
BUT... the judges aren't allowed to dictate how the Administration does it's job.
Trump can be impeached, but that won't happen when his party controls the House and Senate.
There ARE constitutional remedies for all of this, but having one separate, but equal, branch try to overrule another is not the remedy.
Democrats LOST the election and can't successfully impeach the President, so they tear up the Constitution and find a judge that will do their bidding. But it won't last.
The rulings will be overturned by a higher court. The judges may be impeached, but I doubt it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's the NY STATE Supreme Court, you know that right? It is not "the" Supreme Court, it is The Supreme Court of New York.
Federal law allows non-citizens to vote in municipal AND state elections IF the state and locality make it legal. Federal law applies only to Federal elections.
Also, this was A judge of the NY Supreme Court. ONE. Judge. It will likely be appealed to the full NY State Supreme Court. But this is a matter for the STATE to handle. Only TWO states have State Constitutional Amendments forbidding aliens from voting in state and local elections. (AZ and ND)
Just sayin'
18 U.S. Code § 611 - Voting by aliens
(a)It shall be unlawful for any alien to vote in any election held solely or in part for the purpose of electing a candidate for the office of President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, Delegate from the District of Columbia, or Resident Commissioner, unless—
(1)the election is held partly for some other purpose;
(2)aliens are authorized to vote for such other purpose under a State constitution or statute or a local ordinance; and
(3)voting for such other purpose is conducted independently of voting for a candidate for such Federal offices, in such a manner that an alien has the opportunity to vote for such other purpose, but not an opportunity to vote for a candidate for any one or more of such Federal offices.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The verdict is irrelevant. Anyone can donate to someone's defense and everyone is entitled to a defense.
The problem is...he used the Department's computer to make the donation against department policy. He was fired for improper use of department property. No doubt every police officer there uses the department computer for personal purposes at one time or another...checking personal email, etc. If he can show that others use the computers without discipline, or with much less discipline (a verbal or written warning, for example) he would have a case.
I suggest he gather his information, file suit and when he gets his job back with back pay (probably in an out-of-court settlement) then he should cash the check and move to Florida. He'll get an additional $5,000 bonus, have no state income tax, lower housing costs, lower property taxes, no snow, no ice, no mask or vaccine mandates and be protected from defunding.
See you soon. (72 degrees and sunny all day today)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The issue is not with Johnson...the issue is with EIGHT (🖐🏼✌🏼☝🏼) Republicans who voted with Democrats to oust McCarthy. (AKA "the knucklehead caucus") After the 2022 elections, in January 2023, the Republicans had an ELEVEN seat (🖐🏼🖐🏼☝🏼) majority. Now, through their OWN actions, Republicans have a TWO (✌🏼) seat majority.
That is NOT Johnson's fault.
BTW, under McCarthy, the House PASSED HR 2 which provided money to BUILD THE WALL, but then they fired McCarthy! 🤪
Schumer, in the Senate, is the person that WILL NOT protect our own borders...NOT Johnson.
Moscow Marjorie Taylor Greene (MMTG)...who was handed a FIVE (🖐🏼) to ONE (☝🏼) loss on her amendment to defund Ukraine (the legislative equivalent of a "Swirly"), that Moscow Marjorie introduced on Putin's behalf ...is NOW trying to oust Johnson, with a TWO (✌🏼) seat majority. Meaning if the Republicans lose even ONE (☝🏼) member's vote...we get Speaker Hakeem Jefferies.
Brilliant!!!!!!!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There is no '50% tax' on Social Security.
If you are SINGLE, collecting Social Security, and your total income exceeds $25,000 then 50% of your Social Security benefits are subject to being taxed. That is NOT 'a 50% tax.' By comparison, for a single working person, ALL of their income over $13,000 is subject to tax. That does not mean there is a '100% tax on all income over $13,000.' PLUS, all of a working person's income is subject to FICA taxes, Social Security is not.
If your Social Security income was $25,000, HALF of that ($12,500) would be subject to be taxed. You would NOT be taxed $12,500. The amount of tax you would pay would depend on your tax bracket, but if Social Security is your ONLY income, and was just barely over $25,000, you would pay very little, if any, tax.
Because that does not include other deductions or exemptions or credits you may have which would -0- out your amount due.
IF you had some earned income in addition to Social Security, even from a part time job, you could be eligible for the Earned Income Tax Credit and end up getting a REFUND, even though a a portion of your Social Security is taxable and you paid -0- income tax.
I am in favor of exempting Social Security benefits from ALL tax...but there is no need to spread misinformation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
DeSantis has a deep bench to choose from. Lara Trump wouldn't be a bad choice, but there are MANY others. Lara is a very recent transplant to Florida v. many excellent lifelong Floridians DeSantis can choose from, including himself.
Let's keep in mind that DeSantis himself has had his eye on a Senate seat. Also keep in mind that whoever gets appointed will serve until a special election in 2026 to choose a replacement to fill out Rubio's seat until 2028 and then have another election in 2028 for the next full term.
DeSantis COULD appoint his wife, Casey DeSantis, to fill the seat until 2026 when she would conveniently 'drop out' and Ron DeSantis could step in to run because his term as Governor ends in...wait for it...2026.
OR
DeSantis could also resign as Governor, leaving Lt. Governor Jeanette Nunez to appoint Ron DeSantis as Senator.
OR
If DeSantis drops his desire to be a Senator, he could appoint any number of great Floridians. Jeanette Nunez, Ashley Moody (though Ashley has said she is not interested), Byron Donalds, Anna Paulina Luna, or Greg Stuebe. Just to name a few. Both of the US Representatives are from solid red districts and easily be replaced by Republicans in their own special elections.
As a Floridian, I would be happy with ANY of the above as my Senator.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jimerickson1809
Grand Juries are not trials. Indictments (no matter how many there are) are not convictions.
In a grand jury proceeding, the accused has no representation, no cross examination of witnesses and no opportunity to present evidence or witnesses. The phrase "you can indict a ham sandwich" is not without merit.
Due process. In the USA, each defendant is entitled to due process. Maybe not in the country where you live, but here in the USA, that is the law of the land.
Due process means every step, every accusation and every action can be examined, tested, challenged...all the way to the US Supreme Court.
This is a very complex accusation against 19 defendants. There will be many months, if not years, of pre-trial motions.
Other RICO trials have taken as long as 5 years to begin!
Come back and tell me when I'm wrong.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nancyseery2213 Before they vote. That's what the 'rules' are all about. 3 days for review by House members and YOU...if you do your part, read the bill and contact your representatives.
In THIS case for THIS bill, they suspended the rules, but that requires a 2/3 vote to pass, not simple majority.
The bill was available on the House website early this afternoon. It is distributed to the website at the same time it is distributed to the House members.
I read it.
Did you?
ALL actions in Congress are available to the public (the voters). Bills, committee procedures, committee votes, floor votes, and how each representative (or Senator) voted, everything.
Musk and Ramaswamy, and the media, don't have a secret back door, they get it off the same website you can access.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1