Comments by "gary K" (@garyK.45ACP) on "Elon Musk Just PROVED Vijaya Gadde Used Twitter For Election Interference \u0026 Much More! Time For Jail" video.

@mikesixx7655 Sedition: "18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both." Nothing Twitter employees did meets the definition of sedition and the penalty is NOT the same as Treason. Treason has a minimum 5 year prison sentence and Sedition has a maximum 5 year prison sentence. You are repeating garbage you read on internet comments.
3
The number of people who think "Treason" = "doing stuff I don't like" Is shocking. It is NOT Treason. Treason actually has a definition. This isn't it. What is the crime? Please cite the statute. Other than lying in Congress, I haven't seen anything they did that is a crime. Was it dirty, underhanded, sneaky? YES! But that is not a crime.
2
@jw-hy5nq Sure. Cite the statute in the federal code that they will be prosecuted for violating. I'll wait.
2
@Justintime2grow No answer. Predictable. You are correct. You can say stupid things on the internet and not have to prove it to anyone. You're entitled. Expecting someone to be charged with a crime that doesn't exist will result in disappointment.
2
@Life-tastic Great. Cite the statute
2
@Life-tastic what is the criminal code for that? USC?
2
@Life-tastic Section 230 is not a criminal code. Cite the US criminal code. It will look like this: XX USC . XXXX.XX Fill in the numbers. Copy the text and paste it here. I'll wait.
2
@Life-tastic Didn't read. No need to. I asked for you to cite the federal criminal code. You didn't. I'm not interested in babble. If you wish to reply to my comment, put the US Code in the first sentence. I'll wait.
2
Except for possible perjury in Congressional testimony...what crime would they be charged with? Please cite the statute.
1
@mikesixx7655 Here are ALL the federal statutes regarding treason, sedition, subversion and rebellion. Read them. NOTHING Twitter did meets any of these definitions. Other than lying to Congress, there IS NO crime here. 18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
1
@Life-tastic If there is no federal criminal code that has been violated, then just acknowledge that I am correct. Other than a possible (though unlikely) charge of lying to Congress for a few people, no crime has been committed.
1
@Justintime2grow You could have not said anything and looked a lot less foolish. You're dismissed.
1
@Life-tastic Still no answer. Are you done now? Is that out of your system? NO ONE will be charged with a crime for any of this. Because there IS NO CRIME. (with the possible exception of some people charged with lying to Congress, highly unlikely)
1
@CaptainSeamus Please cite the statutes a good prosecutor would use. I don't need your words of fantasy, I need a criminal statute. Anyone can write words...gve us the US Code that applies. It will look like this: XX U.S. Code § XXXX Fill in the Xs. I'm still waiting. No one has answered. You can be the first!
1
Hate to tell everyone in the comments, except for lying under oath to Congress there is no crime here. Private companies CAN censor speech in any manner they wish. It is not a crime. You don't have to like it, that's just a fact. The government cannot participate, but if they did, that's a problem for the government, not Twitter employees. And again, what is the CRIME? What is the statute violated and what is the specified punishment? I suppose you could try to charge someone with conspiracy to violate civil rights, but that would be a major stretch. But who would bring the charges? The DOJ? Don't make me laugh. Individuals COULD sue other individuals. For example, Dan Bongino could sue Vijaya Ghaddi. I'm not sure it would go anywhere. Civil court. Not a crime.
1