Comments by "gary K" (@garyK.45ACP) on "Elon Musk Makes More Twitter Staff Quit! They Are AFRAID Of What The Twitter Files Will Reveal!" video.

Which US code criminal statute did they violate?
3
@beavisjones1831 Title IX is not a criminal statute, nor is it applicable in this case. (Google US Dept. of Justice, Title IX) But, even if it were applicable, the company, Twitter, would be civilly liable for any actions these people took as employees of Twitter. So...Elon Musk would pay the fines for what they did. You think that is right? Is that what you want? FACT: Other than possible perjury in testimony in Congress, there is no violation of criminal law in what they did. Twitter IS a private company and they CAN decide what is on their platform. IF the government assisted them in suppressing free speech that's an issue for the government to deal with, but in any case is not a criminal offense. The only question would be if that voids their protection under Act 230 and subjects them to civil lawsuits as a "publisher". Again...any such claims now would go against Elon Musk, who is fixing the problem. I imagine any court would toss such a lawsuit.
3
Hey, Keith Oberman...just BUY Twitter. I am sure Musk would sell it to you for a tidy profit. I bet $75 Billion would get his interest.
1
More and more and more DNC/Administration connected people keep getting exposed. Can Elon Musk just reveal ALL of them? Who else is there?
1
Jakc Dorsey's attorney should be telling him to STFU right about now.
1
@chrisclark1852 I did. Hence my opinion. Absent charges of lying to Congress (not likely) there is no criminal offense.
1
@anotterwithaphone3077 Pay close attention, I'll speak slowly... There won't be any "charges". It is not a criminal statute. There could possibly be civil complaints (lawsuits). Employees of a corporation (Twitter IS a corporation) are generally exempt from personal liability for civil claims. The claim would be against "Twitter, Inc.", not Elon Musk. Not Jack Dorsey. Not Vijaya Ghaddi. However, Elon Musk owns all shares of Twitter, Inc. The settlement (or judgement) would eventually come out of Elon Musk's pocket, just as it would have previously come out of shareholder's pockets. Doesn't matter if Musk cooperates or not.
1
@beavisjones1831 Whatever. I'll be waiting here for your "connection". Good luck. PS I'm not guessing.
1
@InvincibleSol I didn't think so. But it was the only outside possibility I could imagine, other than possibly some people being charged with lying to Congress.👍
1
@Someone-kg8qf I can tell you type slowly. Nothing you said is relevant. It is not a crime and employees of corporations and governments are not subject to general liability. You're dismissed.
1
@Dynamodel48 Which law? Please cite the statute. Violating an oath is not a crime. I could possibly result in disciplinary action against that employee. They could get fired. It may also result in Congress passing laws to prevent this from happening again. Not likely given the make up of Congress. YT will not block the comment unless you attach a link to another site. Don't do that. No need to. Simply cite the statute # of the "law" you refer to. Such as "18 USC XXX.XX" See. YT will not block that. I'll wait.
1
@Dynamodel48 Ask them. Perhaps trying to protect the value of Twitter stock.🤷‍♂ You are asking me WHY someone else lied? You are trying to determine the reason yourself? Fool's errand. There could hundreds of reasons, not the least of which would be political. Also, you are assuming the "lied" Not so fast. That's difficult to prove. For example, they were asked if they "shadow ban" people. They said "no". That's a lie, right? Under oath, right? Except the Twitter files show us they didn't call the practice "shadow banning". No difference? well, try convincing 12 jurors unanimously of that. That's what a prosecutor has to do. I'm not saying they didn't LIE. They did. I am saying that it isn't what you know, it's what you can prove. AND it is up to the DOJ, run by the Biden administration, to make the decision to actually charge someone. Congress can't do that. That's why I hold the possibility of "Lying to Congress" out there, but it is very unlikely. "Laws being broken" is NOT the same as a crime. You knew that, right? You can break the law and it is not a crime and no one goes to prison. You knew that, right? Violating an oath is not a crime. Hate to tell you. There is no federal crime of "violating an oath", no such statute. In order to be charged with "conspiracy" there has to be an associated crime. You can't be charged with "conspiring" to do something that isn't a crime. A person can be disciplined for violating their oath. They can be fired. They can be impeached if they are an elected official. But it is not a crime and is not even a "violation of law" (unless some states have such a law, I can't comment on every law of every state) As much as you may not like something, that does not make it a crime.
1
@thesaltiestnugget I knew you weren't lawyer. For future reference, you don't have to say that. We know. Cite the statute. "Violation of the 1st Amendment!" Give me the USC or PL that states that those things are a violation of law. Or a crime. I'll wait. (Clue every law that gets overturned as unconstitutional is a violation of the constitution. Who goes to jail for it?) You can't just name off "violations". There has to be a statute. Otherwise I could say "You are guilty of mowing your lawn on Saturday morning!" Criminal codes and Public Laws are public records, available to everyone. You can find them in the same device you used to post your comment(s). You don't have to be a lawyer. I'll wait. James Woods is filing a civil complaint (not a "charge") against a government agency. Correct. And any settlement or judgement will be levied against the government agency, NOT the employees. It's not a crime, no one will go to jail and YOU will pay the settlement. All taxpayers will. Happy now?
1
@anotterwithaphone3077 Which statute does the the charge of "Violating the 1st Amendment" violate? Still waiting. Please provide the USC or PL # that you claim is violated. it will look like this example: 18 USC 1xxx OR Public Law 94-1xx if you don't provide that, you aren't answering.
1
@beavisjones1831 I'm sure you don't. Dismissed.
1
@bloomerb4162 Facts aren't liberal or conservative. If you can cite a criminal statute that was violated by Twitter, please do so. So far, NO ONE has been able to. C'mon...be the first!
1
@bloomerb4162 No answer. Typical liberal.
1
@jamesbassham2273 Fauci. "Go after them" for what? Please cite the criminal statute(s) that were violated. You do know that private companies CAN limit speech on their platforms, right? To any degree they wish. That IS legal. And they can do it for any reason, or no reason at all. Just because. They don't have to be fair. You know that, right? If you are expecting these people to be "gone after", you will be disappointed. Your fantasy will not come true. You can accept that today or be disappointed in the future. Your choice. Musk, after buying the business, has decided not to censor speech *as much*, though he is still censoring. The "problem" is that all these people said they weren't doing this, but the internals show they were lying. Lying is not a crime, unless it is done under oath AND it can be proven to a jury. And the Biden DOJ has to bring the charges. Anything else is just a public embarrassment or potential disciplinary action from their employer. .
1
@jamesbassham2273 No answer. Typical liberal. I voted for Trump twice. That doesn't make things illegal that aren't. Can you cite a criminal statute violated? I'll wait. C'mon! Be the first!
1