Comments by "gary K" (@garyK.45ACP) on "'Do You Want Your Dad To Do Another Debate?': Trump Jr. Speaks To CNN Following Vance-Walz VP Debate" video.

  1. No more debates! Trump already did two. Vance was outstanding! He is definitely a contender for 2028!
    303
  2.  @criscross7362  I said: "No more debates! Trump already did two. Vance was outstanding! He is definitely a contender for 2028!" What part of that is wrong?
    3
  3. CNN gave Trump a "fair debate" because it was their job to wreck Biden so the DNC could get rid of him! That was the MISSION of the first debate...which is WHY they had it in JUNE. The media then went 24/7 against Biden, the polls went 24/7 against Biden until he dropped out. THEN the media immediately went all in on Harris, and Harris went from the "lowest rated VP ever" to the "leader" of the polls for President in just two weeks! Voila! The most transparent media/DNC collaboration in history! But it won't work. PEOPLE choose the President, not the media.
    3
  4.  @criscross7362  🤷‍♂ The Democrats chose all the debate venues/moderators/dates. The Democrats also switched horses mid stream. You don't get 2 debates per candidate. Think about that next time you protect a senile candidate through the primaries.
    2
  5.  @oreldm  If his answers aren't adequate, then maybe you shouldn't vote for Trump like you did in 2016 and 2020.
    1
  6.  @oreldm  Oh good. I thought we lost a vote. Glad to hear your criticism of Vance is just irrelevant noise. If you already decided, why do you even care what Vance answers? 🤪 What did you think of Walz refusing to answer "yes or no" if he was in Tiananmen Square during the revolution like he lied about? His response was "me no do words good", but only after 2 minutes of rambling word vomit. What did you think about that?
    1
  7.  @streetstar221  Usually all debates are completed before voting begins. This early and mail in voting complicates matters. And when the Democrats decided to have their convention in late August, that doesn't leave a lot of time. Parties don't usually change candidates and substitute someone that no one voted for. Democrats injected a LOT of unusual circumstances into this election cycle, and then want to follow the "usual" debate schedule...but only at venues they choose. Ridiculous. Two is enough.
    1