Comments by "gary K" (@garyK.45ACP) on "LegalEagle" channel.

  1. "You owe me $20 and you stopped me to pay me back?" "You want my autograph?"
    19
  2. Barr is the Attorney General of the United States. YOU are a "lawyer" who lacks sufficient billable hours to keep you busy so you review movies on YouTube and hawk cheap suits. I'll go with Barr. And now that the report has been released...
    1
  3.  @benthomason3307  The Mueller report addresses his arguments. He is wrong. It explains why he reviews movies on YouTube. Which is better than some Trump hating lawyers, like Michael Avanatti, for example. A real lawyer would have waited until the report was released to comment.
    1
  4.  @benthomason3307  It doesn't. 1. Lawyers don't do ANYTHING without being paid (or having the potential for being paid) 2. Lawyers, like politicians, are split about 50/50 on everything because there are always two sides paying them to say what they do. 3. What lawyers WILL agree "says a lot" is NO INDICTMENTS. Ask any criminal lawyer what they tell their client when their case is "declined" by a prosecutor. That's what happened. Trump was not "exonerated", he was declined for prosecution. There were NO INDICTMENTS of ANYONE for collusion or obstruction. None, -0-, zilch, nada. NO ONE. Not the President, not Don Jr., not Jared or Ivanka, not even Manafort, Gates or Cohen or (name any other "villain") NONE. This is known as a "dry hole". When you hit a dry hole, you should stop digging. When you are way past the point there should have been water, you stop digging. I think THAT says a LOT. Have a nice day. I am.
    1
  5.  @benthomason3307  Advertisers. Unless he is demonetized by Yahoo (doubtful, his content has nothing that would demonetize him) he gets paid for views. Not to mention his hawking cheap suits. Topics which generate a lot of views (hmmm, Trump/Russia/Mueller) generate a lot of $$$.
    1