Comments by "gary K" (@garyK.45ACP) on "Newsmax"
channel.
-
1500
-
625
-
501
-
275
-
209
-
201
-
147
-
129
-
126
-
117
-
100
-
90
-
90
-
89
-
83
-
80
-
78
-
64
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
58
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
53
-
52
-
50
-
49
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
43
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
29
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
Abbot should keep lines of busses at busy border crossings. Label the busses "New York City", "Chicago", "Washington DC", etc. Add some in for Portland, OR, Minneapolis, MN and Seattle, WA. Maybe some for Napa Valley, CA. Be sure to include some busses for Aspen, CO and places like Chappaqua, the Hamptons, and Lake George.
Illegals can sign requests/releases at the door to the bus, stow their luggage and get aboard. When the bus is full...it leaves and another, empty bus, takes it's place. There should be a constant and continuous flow of busses out of these border crossings.
Every bus load saves Texas taxpayers MILLIONs of $$$.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
You are repeating nonsense you have heard on the internet. There IS NO provision of the NATO charter which prevents the admission of a country which is involved in a war of defense IF they meet the other terms of the UN charter. Period. You can read it for yourself, is is a public document and there is no need to post uniformed information. Here is the evaluation of Ukraine's eligibilty for your edification: (I bet you won't read it and will prefer to argue your ignorance)
Article 1 of the Treaty states that Allies undertake to settle international disputes peacefully and act to this end in accordance with the United Nations Charter. Ukraine has never solved international disputes by military means. In this context, it is very important that, despite the full understanding of Russian aggression in the East and the annexation of Crimea, the state has never declared a state of war. The bet of Ukraine and its western partners is on the Minsk agreements as a mechanism for resolving the conflict in Donbas, which, of course, draws criticism in respect of their impact on the security situation in the ATO zone. At the same time, they fully comply with the terms of Article 1 of the Treaty: it's about resolving the conflict by peaceful means. Similarly, Turkey and Greece have been trying to resolve by peaceful means their territorial disputes over Northern Cyprus (where Turkey had the status of guarantor of the existence of a united Cyprus until 1974).
Article 2 of the Treaty stipulates that Allies contribute toward the development of friendly and peaceful international relations by strengthening their free institutions and stability. They shall seek to eliminate conflict in their international economic policies and will encourage economic collaboration between any or all of them.
Article 3. Member States shall develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack.
For many years, Ukraine has been a reliable partner of the Alliance and participated in many Alliance missions before the war in Donbas. Today, our country is actively cooperating with NATO in the process of rebuilding and strengthening the capabilities of not only the Ukrainian Armed Forces, but also the entire security and defense sector. Priority is to achieve interoperability with Allied forces and compliance with NATO standards by 2020. Thus, Ukraine's policy is in line with this paragraph of the Treaty.
Article 4. Member States shall consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened.
Article 5. It's the most prominent one, providing for the use of collective defense in the event of an attack on one of the Allies. But here we also find an important detail. The Treaty requires that the Allies provide assistance individually or collectively, including through the use of armed forces. This means that the Treaty does not contain a direct obligation to use the armed forces of member states for such assistance. According to the regulations and practice, assistance can be provided at the expense of resources, logistics and other kinds (intelligence, technical, etc.) of support. This de jure levels skeptical allegations that Ukraine's accession to the Alliance, provided that the conflict in the East is preserved, will mean the need for an automatic application of Article 5 of the Treaty. Article 5 de jure does not entail an obligation to declare war on the aggressor and necessarily apply force against it.
Moreover, given that the armed conflict in Ukraine does not cover the immediate border with Russia located in the occupied territory, legally, from the point of view of Article 5, Ukraine may resort to treating the situation according to the precedent of 1974, when Article 5 was not applied. Consequently, from the legal point of view, even if the military conflict in the East of Ukraine is preserved, the accession to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization will not automatically lead to drawing other Allies into this war. Such an interpretation of the provisions of the Treaty allows Ukraine focusing on reforming its own security and defense sector without distracting on the problem of Russian aggression as a means of preventing our country from joining NATO and the European Union.
Article 7 emphasizes that the Treaty's Article 5 shall not be applied in the event that a member state carries out peacekeeping measures in accordance with UN decisions.
Article 8 emphasizes that at the time of accession to the Organization, the country must not have international obligations that are in conflict with the Treaty. Ukraine in its foreign policy acts within the framework of the UN Charter, which is a basic document for NATO. Consequently, it does not have any international obligations that contradict the Treaty.
Article 10 of the document states that Member States may invite any other European State to accede to the Treaty (that is, to become a NATO member) and contribute to Euro-Atlantic security. Ukraine is a reliable international partner and is ready to contribute to Euro-Atlantic security, which is evident by its participation in UKRPOLBAT.
Article 11 contains the requirement for ratification of the Treaty by all Member States. This makes any country's accession to the Alliance a purely political issue, as was the case with the decision on Ukraine's associate membership in the EU and liberalization of the visa regime between our state and the European Union.
Thus, the only conditions for the country's membership in the Alliance are envisaged in the preamble of the Treaty. It states that the parties to the Treaty reaffirm their commitment to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and their desire to live peacefully with all peoples and governments resolute in the process of safeguarding the freedom, common heritage and civilization of their peoples based on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law. They also seek to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area, being resolved to unite their efforts for collective defense and for the preservation of peace and security.
The Revolution of Dignity has confirmed as priority the development of democracy and freedom in Ukraine. We are interested in the stability and well-being of the Euro-Atlantic area and committed to the preservation of peace and security.
Thus, the aggression of the Russian Federation cannot be considered a legal obstacle to Ukraine's accession to the Alliance. The prospect of gaining membership lies exclusively in the political plane. It depends on how quickly and efficiently Ukraine will move on the way toward embracing NATO standards, strengthening democratic institutions and remaining a predictable and stable country of the Euro-Atlantic area.
This does not mean that we have to apply for membership immediately. As a civilized partner who shares the values and visions of NATO, we are convinced that we must first accomplish certain tasks concerning criteria, compatibility and state-political stability that will allow us to finally state: "We are ready and able to pass the test on membership through ratification by partner parliaments".
Iryna Friz is a Head of the Permanent Delegation of Ukraine to the NATO PA
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Russia, and Ukraine for that matter, have ALWAYS trained school children on the use and shooting of firearms since after WW2. They had this experience of being invaded before, remember? Ukraine has been making a remarkable defense against Russia, due in no small part to the training each and every Ukrainian school student receives. I do not expect them to stop training their children after they defeat Russia in the current war.
This instruction is given to both boys and girls, is NOT optional and has been going on for EIGTHY YEARS!!!!!!! If General Holt doesn't know this he should be in another line of work, maybe he could be your "diversity and inclusion" advisor?
My wife, born and raised in Kharkiv, Ukraine during the USSR was trained beginning in grade school with single shot "TOZ 8" .22 rifles (TOZ is the abbreviation for "Tula Arms Factory") and, later, moving on to SKS and AK-47 (Kalashnikov) rifles. They not only had classroom training but had live fire on shooting ranges. They were also taught first aid and other "combat skills"
These are official, course curriculum, classes and continue through college (if one goes to college). They appear on her official High School and College transcripts as "Military Preparedness"
They had competitions on assembling and disassembling the rifles. Which is what you are probably showing in your clip. My wife was the fastest in her class, she proudly reports!
I WISH we trained kids on firearms in every school in the USA, instead of CRT and transsexual/homosexual nonsense.
BTW, my wife, now a naturalized US citizen is an avid firearms enthusiast (along with me) and we go shooting 2-3 days a week. She has her own collection of shotguns, rifles and handguns and especially enjoys her 2nd Amendment RIGHT to keep and bear arms, which they did NOT have in the USSR (or Russia or Ukraine)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
You know little to nothing about voting laws OR becoming a citizen. You should probably comment on some other topic.
The US Constitution does NOT prevent non-citizens from voting in STATE or LOCAL elections. Neither does federal law. The US Constitution and Federal law address ONLY federal elections. Federal law expressly ALLOWS states and municipalities to allow non-citizens to vote in state or local elections, provided it does not violate state or local laws...18 U.S. Code § 611 (a)(1)(2)(3)
Only TWO states ban non-citizens from voting in state or local elections with their State Constitutions, North Dakota and Arizona. Some other states prevent it with state laws.
Many municipalities in the US already allow non-citizens to vote in local elections. NYC would not be the first, just the largest.
A person cannot just "register, take the test, and become a citizen". After the initial process of requesting to be admitted to the US LEGALLY (which itself can take anywhere from 1-14 years depending on the circumstances) a person must reside in the USA for 3-5 years (again, depending on the circumstances of initial entry) and THEN apply for citizenship, which takes another 12-18 months before you get to take the citizenship test (which 97% of native born US adult citizens can't pass). All of this costs thousands of dollars and requires no less than 3 background checks, interviews, medical exams, vaccinations...all of which the prospective immigrant pays for. They are fingerprinted and photographed for each of these processes.
After initial legal entry the Legal Permanent Resident must file income tax returns every year, even if they had no income of their own, report their current address to USCIS and update their address anytime they move. When applying for citizenship, they must provide all tax returns and any change of address notifications, records of marriage/divorce/name change, and records of ANY violations of law...including traffic tickets...with the final disposition of any such case. They must also report each and every time the left the USA for more than 24 hours, for how long and for what purpose, along with documentation of that, such as passport stamps.
I'm not guessing.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@99.6survivalrate8 Murder is NOT a federal offense UNLESS...
1. the murder is of a federal judge or a federal law enforcement official (e.g., an agent of the FBI, DEA, TSA, or ATF),
2. the killing is of an immediate family member of a federal law enforcement official,
3. the murder is of an elected or appointed federal official (e.g., the President, a Supreme Court Justice, a member of Congress, or the murder of a federal judge)
4. the killing is committed during a bank robbery
5. the killing takes place aboard a ship at sea (e.g., on a vessel that is engaged in interstate commerce per the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution) that is in US Federal waters OR in international waters IF the ship is flagged by the USA.
6. the murder was designed to influence a court case, and
7. the killing takes place on federal property (e.g., on national parks or a Native American reservation).
None of these apply to Kyle Rittenhouse.
Rittenhouse was charged by the STATE of Wisconsin, NOT by the Federal Government.
Notice I did not end any of my sentences with a question mark. This is because I am not guessing.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@karenstepp669 Trump has succeeded by doing everything no one thought he would ever do. He succeeded by not following the "rules". The GOP is supposed to be about stodgy old white men. Trump is not a stodgy old white man. (old and white, but not stodgy) Pence is. Trump needed a stodgy old white man in 2016. Now that Trump has proved himself, and has overwhelming support of the GOP, he needs to expand the base even more.
DeSantis is not a stodgy old white man, but he a younger version of Trump. In fact, he'll tell a reporter to go pound sand even more directly than Trump.
But we don't need two "Trumps" on the ticket to win. We need to go right into the opponents camp and TAKE their votes away and add them to ours. Trump has already got 93% of the GOP vote. He needs more of the Dem vote. He needs to reach the suburban women, the minorities...without surrendering conservative values.
Kristi Noem, Candace Owens or Kim Klacik do just that. There are lots of videos on Candance Owens on YouTube, check her out. She is a huge supporter of Trump and has a great presence.
IMO the best of the three for VP is Candace Owens. Kristi Noem and Kim Klacik (if Kim doesn't win a Congressional seat in the 2022 or 2024 election) should be in Trump's cabinet. DeSantis should be Attorney General. DeSantis can still be assigned the border issues...or maybe Kristi Noem as DHS Secretary, let her do it. She'd be great at it. Let DeSantis clean up the FBI, DOJ and BATFE. Klacik would be a great HUD Secretary.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"There is no recession, there are no tragedies, the border is closed, this is the best economy in history, it's Putin's fault, It's Trump's fault, it's covid ...January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6 January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6, !!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Actually, as much as I like Senator Kennedy, he berated this woman pretty heavily for being a member of the Little Oktoberists, Young Pioneers and the Komsomol. ALL were organizations EVERY student in the Soviet Union had to belong to throughout their school. Students did not "join" and did not "quit" or resign. That was all done for them by the state. His persistence with this line of questions demonstrated his total ignorance of that fact. As a SUPPORTER of Senator Kennedy, I was appalled! Whoever gave him this information needs to be checked out, he may have a Democrat operative in his office attempting to make him look ridiculous.
There are thousands of reasons to disagree with this woman, and oppose her nomination. Involuntary membership in organizations as a child/student is not one of them. Each and every person who went to school in the USSR was part of these organizations.
"Little Oktoberists" was for students under age 9. From age 9-14 students were in the "Young Pioneers" and from age 14 - until finished with school (up to age 28) students were in the "Komsomol." Most all students knew exactly what it was, just as they knew that the publication "Pravda" was not actually "truth". (Pravda is the Russian word for "true").
These organizations, and their purpose, are exactly WHY we should oppose "Critical Race Theory" in our own schools. This is exactly what Democrats are trying to do here...but it is not the fault of the children/students being taught this trash. Imagine, in 2061, someone being berated because they were taught Critical Race Theory when they were a child in 2021.
I assure you that Ukrainian born Representative Victoria Spartz (R-IN), as strong a supporter of capitalism and freedom as she is, was also a member. As was my Ukrainian born wife, now a naturalized US citizen, firearms/shooting enthusiast and Trump voter.
This is so well know by our government, that when interviewed for he Green Card and US Citizenship by USCIS, my wife was specifically asked "Other than involuntary membership in student organizations, were you ever a member of the Communist Party?"
While Melania Trump was raised in Communist Slovenia, which was not part of the USSR, she no doubt was also a member of a similar organization.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@debbiematteo7046 Well, I live in Florida, so let me respond.
DeSantis is term limited. He cannot be Governor past 2026. He is not "Governor for Life".
His leadership inspired us in to Florida to elect an overwhelming majority, of both chambers of our legislature, with solid conservative Republicans. A "Super Majority +" Unlike Trump, DeSantis increased Republican influence in the legislature.
Florida has a large pool of candidates in DeSantis' mold. We will choose one of them to replace DeSantis in 2026 anyway. Ashley Moody, Byron Donalds, Greg Stuebe, Webster Barnaby, Jennette Nunez. We all know who these good candidates are, even if you don't.
We know what to do. We are all big boys and girls here in Florida.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1