Youtube hearted comments of gary K (@garyK.45ACP).
-
4800
-
266
-
258
-
127
-
41
-
39
-
19
-
18
-
17
-
10
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
My father, a veteran of WW2 brought home many guns. 8 P-38s, 2 Lugers and an absolutely gorgeous Czech made 16 ga. double barrel shotgun. An "Opava Ferdinand". It is "best quality" in every sense of the word. Not to mention knives, bayonets, etc.
Pistols, rifles and shotguns were no problem to send home or bring back. Officially, a soldier had to get his commanding officer's signature to send it home, or bring it home. More often, they were just packed in boxes and mailed back, free of charge. US soldiers enjoyed FREE postal service.
The story on the shotgun was that my father's tank platoon was advancing through a German village. He was a platoon Technical Sargent/tank commander and was in the 4th tank of the column. A German woman stood by the side of the road, holding a "suitcase looking thing" and waving at the passing tanks. The tanks just passed by, ignoring the woman. My father ordered his tank to stop and he spoke to the woman and managed to understand that she wanted to "surrender her father's gun", so she would not be considered an enemy. My father took the case and opened the fitted, leather covered case to see the beautiful shotgun! "Well, hello!" He gladly took the surrender and told the woman to go in peace. π
FYI, Mark...The US required registration of machine guns beginning in 1934. It was, and still is, legal to own them, but you had to register them with the government and if you sold the gun there was, and still is, a $200 "transfer tax".
It was illegal to "bring back" an automatic rifle or submachine gun during WW2. However...as you state...it was done. By the tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands.
Recognizing this, the US government implemented an "amnesty" in 1968 and allowed anyone with a "bring back" automatic weapon to legally register them without any fees or taxes. Any "bring back" after that date, not registered with the federal government, is an illegally owned machinegun.
And another aside...my father joined the army in 1934 in the fledgling "tank corps". He was issued a 1918 manufactured Model 1911 pistol. The 1911A1 was, by that time, "standard" but they were still handing out WW1 1911s, particularly to NCOs in the tank corps, transport services, etc. He kept that gun throughout his career. He retired in 1956 and turned in his 1911. The Army told him it was now classified as "obsolete" and that he could buy it if he chose. For $17. He bought his cherished friend without hesitation. I have it in my collection now, with the documents of the purchase and the holster he carried it in for more than 20 years.
The US government still sells obsolete, fully functional military rifles and handguns to the public. Currently you can buy M1 rifles and M1911/M1911A1 handguns. I believe all the M1 carbines have been sold off.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Earlier today, I watched one of your videos from a few years ago, comparing the .45-70 and .500 S&W Magnum. Very informative, but your style now is much more fun.
My thoughts on this gun...pretty cool, BUT a gun with three barrels, interchangeable chokes and no way to select barrels is pretty useless. The point of having two (or more) different chokes is to be able to immediately select different chokes for different situations. Incoming targets, outgoing targets, targets at close range or longer range. If you can't choose which barrel to fire first, (and second or third) they may as well all be the same. You've lost the advantage for hunting and greatly increased manufacturing costs. May as well have a cheaper semi-auto or pump with a single barrel.
As a defense gun? Three shot capacity AND you have to disable the gun to reload. Having to claw the empties out under stress, rather than having auto ejectors, pretty much ruins it for defense (on top of a 3 shot capacity)
Basically this demonstrates why police and military haven't used break action shotguns since the late 1800s.
But it DOES look like fun and it is definitely unusual.
Thanks, Scott. π
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
3:13 Burlington is NOT the state capital. πMontpelier is.
Burlington is the largest city, (40,000 or so not counting college students) and there aren't many good jobs there either. Unless you work for one of the universities or the hospital, there isn't much else. There are quite a few Government offices in Vermont, thanks to the influence of Senator Leahy. USCIS, ICE and others have large facilities there. Those are good jobs, but not very many. Retail, sandwich shops, dairy farms, starving artists and seasonal jobs at ski resorts make up the rest. A huge percentage of people are on unemployment/welfare at least part of the year. Particularly construction workers. The "factories" in Vermont are not high paying jobs...Ben & Jerry's, Vermont Teddy Bear, Green Mountain Coffee, Cabot Cheese, Champlain Chocolate. Little better than retail work. Burton snowboards moved all their manufacturing to China. The Burlington headquarters is a bunch of hippies designing snowboards. Maple syrup? Yeah, almost all of it in Vermont is produced by small private farms. It's not a big employment factor and the "sugaring season" is only a few weeks in February/March.
Vermont actively runs off any good employers or industry with environmental restrictions and taxes which rival California.
Beautiful state. Absolutely gorgeous. Difficult life, brutally cold, long and snowy winters. If you're retired and can afford two homes, Vermont should be at the top of your list for your summer home. If you like skiing...really great place.
Unfortunately, Vermont has made college graduates it's most valuable export.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1