Comments by "" (@earlysda) on "Animal Origins" channel.

@Aurora666_yt Lex, so you think Richard Dawkins has never heard of fruit flies, finches, crops, domesticated animals, and ring species. . OK. . You are entirely out of your league, brainwashed by pretty pictures in textbooks and amazing cgi in videos.
2
0:03 Barely three seconds in, and we see this is a proselytizing video for the god of Evolution. "Evolution hasn't been observed while it's happening". That means it fails the scientific method.
1
@Aurora666_yt Lex, Evolution professes to explain how humans got to where we are today, thus implying our place in the universe, and our reason for existence. . Evolution very definitely is a religion. And it is a religion without any observed evidence in its favor.
1
@Aurora666_yt Lex, "Evolution hasn't been observed while it's happening." . Therefore, it fails the scientific theory.
1
@AMC2283 AMC, you sound defensive to be told that Evolution, while professing to be "scientific", actually does not have a scientific basis, thus, is properly classifed as a religion.
1
@Aurora666_yt Lex, your refutation of Richard Dawkins' statement is very poor. . Perhaps he is a better biologist than you are? And maybe he is more truthful than you are too? . It is instructive that you try to make religion conform to the scientific method. That reveals your own faith in Evolution, which is no doubt based on faith, not the scientific method.
1
@AMC2283 AMC, "Evolution hasn't been observed while it's happening", so it fails the scientific method. .
1
@AMC2283 AMC, you are back to repeating what you said before. That has nothing to do at all with the fact that "Evolution hasn't been observed while it's happening". . Evolution has never met the requirements to be truly considered "scientific", as it fails the scientific method. . Many Evolution believers have told me over the years that "change equals evolve". They all get angry when shown how ridiculous that statement is. I'm not saying that is your contention, but it is similar.
1
@AMC2283 AMC thinks Richard Dawkins made a "baseless statement" regarding Evolution. . You either aren't serious about the subject at hand, or are ignorant of it, or are just outright avoiding the truth.
1
@Aurora666_yt Lex fails yet again to even attempt to disprove Richard Dawkins. . Every time you do that, Lex, you make your case for Evolution look weaker and weaker. . Thank you.
1
@Aurora666_yt I use your moniker name, "Lex", and you get upset. . I pray you repent of your belief in Evolution, and start following your Creator who loves you so much he not only died on a cross to save you from your sins, but resurrected after 3 days, went to heaven, and is returning soon surrounded by millions of angels to judge us for how we've lived these lives he has so lovingly crafted for us. . How will it be with your soul on that grand and awesome day?
1
@TheHairyHeathen Hairy, Maybe this will help you understand: You see, people DID observe Jesus dying on a cross, being put in a tomb, and having been resurrected. . In contrast, "Evolution hasn't been observed while it's happening". Not even once. So Evolution fails the scientific method. . But then, Christians base their worldview on faith first and foremost, so trying to force Christians into a naturalistic worldview is further evidence that Evolution can't pass the scientific method. . Why not repent, and start loving and following your Creator - Jesus Christ?
1
@Tooblekep Poke, you mean you didn't listen to the first three seconds of the video?
1
"Evolution hasn't been observed while it's happening."
1