Comments by "" (@earlysda) on "Supreme Court rejects challenge to Texas abortion law l WNT" video.

  1. Students, congrats on getting it completely backwards. Anti-birthers want to kill a life, and pro-vaxxers want to force adulterated substances into others' bodies.
    8
  2. So they will have live kids and the rest of America will kill theirs?
    5
  3.  @Fonz128  Ridge, Being pro life is great, but pro vaccine maybe/maybe not. If you want if for yourself, fine, but to force anyone to take it is reprehensible. Wouldn't you agree?
    4
  4. 2:26 "to drive 600 miles in the middle of a pandemic is cruel". But Ms. Tong, what do you call ripping a baby's limbs off and crushing its head?
    3
  5. Chris, why don't the babies get a right to breathe air?
    3
  6. Amen. Amen. Amen. God is going to judge this nation for killing over 50 million of "the least of these my brethren". America, repent now!
    2
  7. Don't babies get a right to breathe air?
    2
  8.  @iamjane9628  Jane, what is "ignorant" about saving babies' lives?
    2
  9.  @LikeBlowingintheWind  OK, Like, "They are human babies". Is that better? Why are you for denying rights of babies to breathe?
    2
  10. Yes! Please! But even better - May all those who wish to kill their children repent and love their babies instead of tearing their limbs off and crushing their brains.
    2
  11. Shame on you Mom 50 for denigrating the president who saved more kids lives than any other president since Roe vs Wade. Why not repent and rejoice that many lives are still being saved thanks to his wise choices?
    2
  12.  @octaviorodriguez6849  Octavio, so why do you think babies should have their limbs hacked off and brains sucked out?
    2
  13. So if you don't have a uterus, you can't save a baby's life?
    1
  14.  @Daniel-Strain  So Daniel, what is the things inside the mother called that is a human, if not a "baby"? Are you going to come up with some cool, scientific-sounding name that tries to obfuscate the fact that it is a human baby?
    1
  15.  @Daniel-Strain  Very good, Daniel. Now let's study this a little deeper. Have you ever seen a chart showing the life cycle of a human? The term "baby" covers everything from conception to up to maybe one year old or more, depending on the individual. Also, to be a "mother", one has to be a mother of something. The standard English usage is to say "I have a baby". . Do you agree that all babies should have the right to breathe air (ingest oxygen)?
    1
  16. @Freeherenow Freehere, Why are you hypocritcal about wanting to deny the rights of babies to be free?
    1
  17.  @SnowWalker1  Snow, your logic is sadly lacking. People will keep doing terrible things, so let's not make any laws to restrict those terrible things - is what you are saying. Perhaps you'd like to rethink that?
    1
  18.  @SnowWalker1  So Snow, why are you against giving babies the right to breathe air? Even slaves got that right.
    1
  19. Mashup, so what do you have against the rights of babies to breathe air?
    1
  20. Humphrey, what is "bad" about saving babies' lives?
    1
  21.  @MetalRush666  Chris, people killing their babies doesn't affect you? That's evil.
    1
  22.  @Sashagable  Sash, sounds like you haven't read the new law, and are just spouting off on you know not what. But to answer your question - an innocent baby should not have to die because of the method in which it came into this world, should it?
    1