Comments by "" (@kallachi729) on "ThePrint"
channel.
-
269
-
150
-
124
-
107
-
106
-
103
-
100
-
Another relevant and thought provoking presentation from SG. Yes, the electorate needs viable choices… But….I have a few points very briefly, (reams can be written on each) as follows:-
1. Why defeat Modi in the first place.? Defeating Modi (or any HOG/Government can not be an aim of the opposition). There is a Nation to be governed.
2. I do not suppose that economy is an issue as it is being handled fairly well in the obtaining circumstances.
3. The reports are that Indian foreign policy has placed it in a very comfortable position among the comity of Nations.
4. One can’t fault the administration too much (some failures/mistakes are always part of any governance….one has to only look at 75 years of Independent India to realize that) in general matters of governance and policies.
5. Handling of security has NOT weakened, given the long history of long unresolved and nebulous Northern borders.
6. If it is politics…here is a take. The Hindutva or rather “anti-Hindutva” and” secular” are no more relevant in Indian politics. The refrain is if political parties can be parochial (TMC, SS, DMK, TRS etc..), religion based (Muslim leagues, Akali etc..), Clan based (Yadavs, Gujjars etc.) and Dalit based (BSP etc.) or Dynastic (INC,SS, Yadavs, DMK, TC etc..) why can’t there be a party which is “Hindu” based? (I have my own take on this “Hindu” myth). What is the difference in any of these approaches? In electoral democracies every political party will attempt to create a strong faithful voter base. Probably BJP is doing just that. (BTW “Hindus” in droves are not blindly flocking to BJP ). THAT is a natural process in democracy. The perception of exclusion is just because the majority are not minority!!! That is also natural. In such an environment it is difficult to separate the wrong from the right in Indian politics – like it or not. And is that not part of diversity too? Can you have diversity with the exclusion of the majority?
Tail piece. Before anything, the opposition has to convince “we the people” that they will do a better job for the Nation. So just a defeat will surely not “deliver “ the Nation from “evil”.
96
-
84
-
78
-
75
-
72
-
65
-
57
-
56
-
55
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
46
-
45
-
Whether it be Ashokan, Nehruvian, Gandhian( not the Mahatma), Modian(? In the future) the Indian state has to do what it must to correct a mistake as soon as it is identified. By that time Ashokas, Guptas, Mauryas, Mughals, Marathas, British, Nehrus, Gandhi’s etc. would have already enjoyed their place in the Sun and may be irrelevant as administrators in the scenarios obtaining in the present. While we respect history we have to move on.
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
37
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
Is the General suggesting that Operational orders and debriefing of operations be in the public domain? As it is there is enough in the public domain for even the uninitiated to surmise the situation. Should not the Nation leave some room for other actions like diplomacy and negotiations? Or is the General on to some agenda other than a winning case for India? E.g. will telling China in public ”look here, I have given you a bloody nose, now get back” work? Or does he, who was calling the shots in these areas as an Army Commander not long ago, suppose holding a public inquiry on all border skirmishes, within days, will help the military (I mean own military, not the enemy’s). I know many Indians, who have their own ideas of free speech and democracy etc, will applaud this General. But Defence, battles and wars are handled differently than Bollywood scandals. I am sure the General knows it too. But alas!
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
29