Youtube comments of (@kallachi729).

  1. 279
  2. 269
  3. 188
  4. 181
  5. 150
  6. 124
  7. 107
  8. 106
  9. 103
  10. 98
  11. Another relevant and thought provoking presentation from SG. Yes, the electorate needs viable choices… But….I have a few points very briefly, (reams can be written on each) as follows:- 1. Why defeat Modi in the first place.? Defeating Modi (or any HOG/Government can not be an aim of the opposition). There is a Nation to be governed. 2. I do not suppose that economy is an issue as it is being handled fairly well in the obtaining circumstances. 3. The reports are that Indian foreign policy has placed it in a very comfortable position among the comity of Nations. 4. One can’t fault the administration too much (some failures/mistakes are always part of any governance….one has to only look at 75 years of Independent India to realize that) in general matters of governance and policies. 5. Handling of security has NOT weakened, given the long history of long unresolved and nebulous Northern borders. 6. If it is politics…here is a take. The Hindutva or rather “anti-Hindutva” and” secular” are no more relevant in Indian politics. The refrain is if political parties can be parochial (TMC, SS, DMK, TRS etc..), religion based (Muslim leagues, Akali etc..), Clan based (Yadavs, Gujjars etc.) and Dalit based (BSP etc.) or Dynastic (INC,SS, Yadavs, DMK, TC etc..) why can’t there be a party which is “Hindu” based? (I have my own take on this “Hindu” myth). What is the difference in any of these approaches? In electoral democracies every political party will attempt to create a strong faithful voter base. Probably BJP is doing just that. (BTW “Hindus” in droves are not blindly flocking to BJP ). THAT is a natural process in democracy. The perception of exclusion is just because the majority are not minority!!! That is also natural. In such an environment it is difficult to separate the wrong from the right in Indian politics – like it or not. And is that not part of diversity too? Can you have diversity with the exclusion of the majority? Tail piece. Before anything, the opposition has to convince “we the people” that they will do a better job for the Nation. So just a defeat will surely not “deliver “ the Nation from “evil”.
    96
  12. 84
  13. 78
  14. 75
  15. 74
  16. 73
  17. 65
  18. 57
  19. 57
  20. 56
  21. 51
  22. 50
  23. 50
  24. 49
  25. 49
  26. 49
  27. 48
  28. 47
  29. 45
  30. 44
  31. 44
  32. 43
  33. 42
  34. 40
  35. 39
  36. 39
  37. 38
  38. 38
  39. 36
  40. 35
  41. 35
  42. 34
  43. 34
  44. 33
  45. 33
  46. 33
  47. 32
  48. 32
  49. 32
  50. 32
  51. 31
  52. 30
  53. 30
  54. 30
  55. 29
  56. 29
  57. 28
  58. 28
  59. 27
  60. 27
  61. 27
  62. 27
  63. 27
  64. 27
  65. 26
  66. 25
  67. 24
  68. 24
  69. 24
  70. 24
  71. 24
  72. 24
  73. 24
  74. 23
  75. 23
  76. 22
  77. 22
  78. 22
  79. 22
  80. 22
  81. 22
  82. 22
  83. 21
  84. 21
  85. 21
  86. 21
  87. 21
  88. 20
  89. 20
  90. 20
  91. 20
  92. 20
  93. 19
  94. 19
  95. 19
  96. 19
  97. 19
  98. 19
  99. 18
  100. 18
  101. 18
  102. 18
  103. 18
  104. 18
  105. 18
  106. 18
  107. 18
  108. 17
  109. 17
  110. 17
  111. 17
  112. 17
  113. 17
  114. 17
  115. 17
  116. 16
  117. 16
  118. 16
  119. 16
  120. 16
  121. 16
  122. 16
  123. 16
  124. 15
  125. 15
  126. 15
  127. 15
  128. 15
  129. 15
  130. 15
  131. 15
  132. 14
  133. 14
  134. 14
  135. 14
  136. 14
  137. 14
  138. 14
  139. 14
  140. 14
  141. 14
  142. 14
  143. 13
  144. 13
  145. 13
  146. 13
  147. 13
  148. 13
  149. 13
  150. 13
  151. 13
  152. 13
  153. 13
  154. 13
  155. 13
  156. 13
  157. 13
  158. 13
  159. 13
  160. 13
  161. 12
  162. 12
  163. 12
  164. 12
  165. 12
  166. 12
  167. 12
  168. 12
  169. 12
  170. 11
  171. 11
  172. 11
  173. 11
  174. 11
  175. 11
  176. 11
  177. 11
  178. 11
  179. 11
  180. 11
  181. 11
  182. 11
  183. 11
  184. 11
  185. 11
  186. 11
  187. 10
  188. 10
  189. 10
  190. 10
  191. 10
  192. 10
  193. 10
  194. 10
  195. 10
  196. 10
  197. 10
  198. 10
  199. 10
  200. 10
  201. 10
  202. 9
  203. 9
  204. 9
  205. 9
  206. 9
  207. 9
  208. 9
  209. 9
  210. 9
  211. 9
  212. 9
  213. 9
  214. 9
  215. 9
  216. 9
  217. 9
  218. 9
  219. 9
  220. 9
  221. 9
  222. 9
  223. 9
  224. 9
  225. 9
  226. 9
  227. 8
  228. 8
  229. 8
  230. 8
  231. 8
  232. 8
  233. 8
  234. 8
  235. 8
  236. 8
  237. 8
  238. 8
  239. 8
  240. 8
  241. 8
  242. 8
  243. 8
  244. 8
  245. 8
  246. 8
  247. 8
  248. 8
  249. 8
  250. 8
  251. 8
  252. 8
  253. 8
  254. 8
  255. 7
  256. 7
  257. 7
  258. 7
  259. 7
  260. 7
  261. 7
  262. 7
  263. 7
  264. 7
  265. 7
  266. 7
  267. 7
  268. 7
  269. 7
  270. 7
  271. 7
  272. 7
  273. 7
  274. 7
  275. 7
  276. 7
  277. 7
  278. 7
  279. 7
  280. 7
  281. 7
  282. 7
  283. 7
  284. 7
  285. 7
  286. 7
  287. 7
  288. 7
  289. 7
  290. 7
  291. 7
  292. 7
  293. 7
  294. 7
  295. 7
  296. 6
  297. 6
  298. 6
  299. 6
  300. 6
  301. 6
  302. 6
  303. 6
  304. 6
  305. 6
  306. 6
  307. 6
  308. 6
  309. 6
  310. 6
  311. There is a lot for farmers in the new laws. The present system of trade of farm produce is a proven failure, pan India. A myopic and political approach to the issue is self defeating. In a large country as India looking at any single factor in isolation is short sightedness; an entire orchestra needs to be put together to create a symphony. The Indian Farmer enjoys the following 1. Free electricity 2. Free water 3. Free /subsidised fertiliser 4. No income tax from farm income 5. Subsidised ration through PDS 6. Direct income transfer 7. Freedom to sell to anybody, anywhere, any time (new laws) 8. Freedom from essential commodity tag 9. Writing off of loans 10. Easy loans 11. Free / subsidized cooking gas These farmers are the only producers (for argument’s sake manufacturers, services sector, dairy sector, farmers of perishable crops etc. are also producers) who is assured of a fixed price (MSP) for some of their produce. It is recorded that even then he does not get what is due to him as he does not have the freedom to directly and freely interact with the market. For instance, there is no MSP for eggs, milk, milk products, perishables (vegetables and fruits) et al. Hence for a common Indian it is beyond comprehension why he can’t get direct and free access to all markets anywhere. Some trepidation is natural while migrating from one system to another. A pragmatic approach for long term benefits have to be considered, rather than make it a political battle ground which benefits none.
    6
  312. 6
  313. 6
  314. 6
  315. 6
  316. 6
  317. 6
  318. 6
  319. 6
  320. 6
  321. 6
  322. 6
  323. 6
  324. 6
  325. 6
  326. An erudite analysis. Way to go. My two bit... Talks and diplomacy are ways to diffuse potentially explosive situations and overcome adversaries; one can win in these parleys only from a position of strength – meaning, to have a potent and deadly Armed Forces. Unfortunately, even while attempting at catch up, the truth is that we are lagging behind for the size of the conventional borders we have. China has built an invisible twenty-first century wall, surpassed only by N’ Korea, around the Nation. I had the occasion to speak with some Chinese professionals while I was in the USA. It seemed to me that they either were unaware of a lot that is happening within China or they were reluctant to say it. I suspect it is the former, else the Americans would have elicited all information. It could also be that the Americans know exactly what is happening within China and are incapable of opposing them or they deliberately avoid doing it in deference to the economy. Either way as of now it seems to be a win-win situation for China. The border pinpricks (with names like Depsang, Pangog etc…) are just that…. pin pricks. China can't achieve much more there. They use LAC as a smoke screen. The larger aim is “economic colonization”. We need to continue to wage an all out war against that. Tail piece: China practices autocracy within and liberal democracy outside the country. It seems to be paying off. The rest of the world has to come up with a brand new ‘weapon’ (tactics, coalition, economic offensive – whatever) to tackle the rise of China. Unless…. China implodes from within (is it happening?). Elementary, Dr. Watson.
    6
  327. 6
  328. 6
  329. 6
  330. 6
  331. 6
  332. 6
  333. 6
  334. 6
  335. 6
  336. 6
  337. 6
  338. 5
  339. 5
  340. 5
  341. 5
  342. 5
  343. 5
  344. 5
  345. 5
  346. 5
  347. 5
  348. 5
  349. 5
  350. 5
  351. 5
  352. 5
  353. 5
  354. 5
  355. During the 70s and 80s China was a poor Nation. That is, far poorer than it is now. But even then, they were well ahead on the LAC deployment than India. We too have now improved our deployment since the 80s. But we are not there in the infrastructure. Since a couple of decades, after China became less poor, for various reasons (I am not discussing them) it has attempted to unilaterally alter the LAC. It is moot how successful they have been, but it would not be a surprise given their better preparedness over decades after 62. Indias neglect of the borders with China since 1962 has been admitted by the Defence Minster Mr. AK Antony on the floor of the house more than a decade ago. China has its fingers (pun intended) all over. Wherever there is a dispute (there sure is on the LAC, especially in eight locations) it is either settled by force or through negotiations. Negotiations means “give and take” without bloodshed. War also means give and take after wasteful expenditures and bloodshed. Points for consideration are: 1. War or negotiations. 2. Is India politically ready for negotiations? 3. Is China ready to negotiate? 4. Is India ready for war? 5. Does China want war? 6. Will internal bickering (in nIndian media and parliament etc…) on a well-known situation help India or China? 7. Is China aiming to destablise India politically (a sure enough aim of any Nation to destablise its neighbour), even proposed as an instrument of war by Chanakya. 8. Are there other options for India like Internationalising the dispute etc. (Not recommended due to obvious reasons as everybody involved will want their pound of flesh) and also extend their “help” all over the place. I am no expert of any sort and have only put out my views as I see the situation. I may be missing a lot.. but then, a view is a view… right? Tailpiece: Could Mr. Rahul Gandhi or any other bureaucrat / political leader address these issues….. or can we have a cut the clutter in this.
    5
  356. 5
  357. 5
  358. 5
  359. 5
  360. 5
  361. 5
  362. 5
  363. 5
  364. 5
  365. 5
  366. 5
  367. 5
  368. 5
  369. 5
  370. 5
  371. 5
  372. 5
  373. 5
  374. 5
  375. 5
  376. 5
  377. 5
  378. 5
  379. 5
  380. 5
  381. 5
  382. 5
  383. 5
  384. 5
  385. 5
  386. 5
  387. 5
  388. 5
  389. 5
  390. 5
  391. 5
  392. 5
  393. 5
  394. 5
  395. 5
  396. 5
  397. 5
  398. 5
  399. 5
  400. 5
  401. 5
  402. 5
  403. 5
  404. 5
  405. 4
  406. 4
  407. 4
  408. 4
  409. 4
  410. 4
  411. 4
  412. 4
  413. 4
  414. 4
  415. 4
  416. 4
  417. 4
  418. 4
  419. 4
  420. 4
  421. 4
  422. 4
  423. 4
  424. 4
  425. Again a very relevant topic handled intelligently with maturity. My take… Indian politics.The Hindutva or rather “anti-Hindutva” and” secular” are no more relevant in Indian politics. The refrain is if political parties can be parochial (TMC, SS, DMK, TRS etc..), religion based (Muslim leagues, Akali etc..), Clan based (Yadavs, Gujjars etc.) and Dalit based (BSP etc.) or Dynastic (INC,SS, Yadavs, DMK, TC etc..) why can’t there be a party which is “Hindu” based? (I have my own take on this “Hindu” myth). What is the difference in any of these approaches? In electoral democracies every political party will attempt to create a strong faithful voter base. Probably BJP is doing just that. (BTW “Hindus” in droves are not blindly flocking to BJP ). THAT is a natural process in democracy. The perception of exclusion is just because the majority are not minority!!! That is also natural. In such an environment it is difficult to separate the wrong from the right in Indian politics – like it or not. And is that not part of diversity too? Can you have diversity with the exclusion of the majority? Tailpiece: There never was, is or will be a Utopia (Ramrajya).The electorate has realized that Governance is all about the Nation to deliver Roti, Kapda and Makkan to its people. All else are distractions. Economy and development (Ease of living) will be key. In order to further preserve Indian democracy, the opposition parties have to change tactics and strategies. We fervently hope that they will do it. Welcome to the changing face of Indian politics.
    4
  426. 4
  427. 4
  428. 4
  429. 4
  430. 4
  431. 4
  432. 4
  433. 4
  434. 4
  435. 4
  436. 4
  437. 4
  438. 4
  439. 4
  440. 4
  441. 4
  442. 4
  443. 4
  444. 4
  445. 4
  446. 4
  447. 4
  448. 4
  449. 4
  450. 4
  451. 4
  452. 4
  453. 4
  454. 4
  455. 4
  456. 4
  457. 4
  458. 4
  459. 4
  460. 4
  461. 4
  462. 4
  463. 4
  464. 4
  465. 4
  466. 4
  467. 4
  468. 4
  469. 4
  470. 4
  471. 4
  472. 4
  473. 4
  474. 4
  475. 4
  476. 4
  477. 4
  478. 4
  479. 4
  480. 4
  481. 4
  482. 4
  483. 4
  484. 4
  485. 4
  486. 4
  487. 4
  488. 4
  489. 4
  490. 4
  491. 4
  492. 4
  493. 4
  494. 4
  495. 4
  496. 4
  497. 4
  498. 4
  499. 4
  500. 4
  501. 4
  502. 4
  503. 4
  504. 4
  505. 4
  506. 4
  507. 4
  508. 4
  509. 4
  510. 3
  511. 3
  512. 3
  513. DK, an extract from a recent article of mine Here is a brief on all important political parties in India and their voter bases (in brackets): BJP (religion), Shiv sena (religion, dynasty), INC (Muslims(religion)), dynasty), Muslim Leagues(religion), Akali (religion), SP (clan, dynasty), BSP (Dalits), DMK, AIDMK (Dravidian Identity, parochial.), - JD(U), YSR Congress, TMC, Biju JD, are all parochial. AAP is a relatively new party and the Left as an ideology is almost extinct in India. Only a couple of parties from these have a national identity, so essential to grow, develop and be counted in the elite Nations of the world. All parties are obviously pursing diverse politics by cozying up to their respective voter bases. None of these parties are really “secular” unless “secular” refers to only wooing Muslims. So, secularism falls flat on its face even before Indian politics is discussed. Gaining and staying in power is the ultimate aim of all political dispositions. Except for two, the BJP and INC, no party can boast of a real national presence. While regional parties come to power in the federal states with a parochial agenda, it has always been a worry for India in the past few decades as to who will rule at the Centre. “It is time we Indians, stopped fooling ourselves with this misplaced sense of secularism. Except pity, all other emotions including tolerance are a two-way traffic, unless as they say one wants to “play politics”. But then on the final count in India, as elsewhere in democracies, politics is a game ultimately played with people’s emotions. The Nation does not progress on emotions. The delivery of progress and development to the people is the only long-term sustaining factor. Yet in a diverse and very big democracy like India, the Nation has to have an emotive rallying point. initiated by a majority of like minded people and carried by all citizens. A simplistic example is the way the nation is moved by cricket. For one of the only surviving ancient civilizations like India, falling back on the still valued ideals and ideas of those times is in no way anti “secular”, if it can unite a nation with a bit of tolerance and understanding from the “minority”, so to speak. “ Tailpiece: Again, I say… Leave I N C to professionals
    3
  514. 3
  515. 3
  516. 3
  517. 3
  518. 3
  519. 3
  520. 3
  521. 3
  522. 3
  523. 3
  524. 3
  525. 3
  526. 3
  527. 3
  528. 3
  529. 3
  530. 3
  531. 3
  532. 3
  533. 3
  534. 3
  535. 3
  536. 3
  537. 3
  538. 3
  539. 3
  540. 3
  541. 3
  542. 3
  543. 3
  544. 3
  545. 3
  546. 3
  547. 3
  548. 3
  549. 3
  550. 3
  551. 3
  552. 3
  553. 3
  554. 3
  555. 3
  556. 3
  557. 3
  558. 3
  559. 3
  560. 3
  561. 3
  562. 3
  563. 3
  564. 3
  565. 3
  566. 3
  567. 3
  568. 3
  569. 3
  570. 3
  571. 3
  572. 3
  573. 3
  574. 3
  575. 3
  576. 3
  577. 3
  578. 3
  579. 3
  580. 3
  581. 3
  582. 3
  583. 3
  584. 3
  585. 3
  586. 3
  587. 3
  588. 3
  589. 3
  590. 3
  591. 3
  592. 3
  593. 3
  594. 3
  595. 3
  596. 3
  597. 3
  598. 3
  599. 3
  600. 3
  601. What is happening now, incursions and excursions et al, between India and China has happened many times earlier; it is just that this time because of technology and increase in international interest on China, the game is being played out louder in the media. The fact is, nothing about LAC has really changed since 1947, as the exact line of LAC has never been agreed by the two parties. Using this as an excuse, China often tries to grab unoccupied territories (patrolled by both etc…) wherever possible and whenever it suits them, along the LAC. The primary intend is nothing more than to keep India on a leash and ensure it is not a competition in South Asia. It is also sad that two Nations, even after wars and lengthy talks, have not been able to resolve it for decades. This happens when one or both parties do not want a resolution. It is abundantly clear here as to who does not want the issue resolved. It is fallacious to expect that, this issue will get resolved any time soon. China has to be brought to the negotiating table, hopefully one day in the near future and define the IB (not LAC). It is imperative that we maintain a strong Defence Force and better strategic stance (not backing down) when we go to the negotiating table, China will win the day, if we as a Nation divert most of our energies here rather than on the economic and societal issues which are more fundamental and enduring to a better future for India. Unfortunately in a geo-political polity we can’t chose our neighbours. Like Snehesh (The Print) often says, War is not a solution while it can extend the problem.
    3
  602. 3
  603. 3
  604. 3
  605. 3
  606. 3
  607. 3
  608. 3
  609. 3
  610. 3
  611. 3
  612. 3
  613. 3
  614. 3
  615. 3
  616. 3
  617. 3
  618. 3
  619. 3
  620. 3
  621. 3
  622. 3
  623. 3
  624. 3
  625. 3
  626. 3
  627. 3
  628. 3
  629. 3
  630. 3
  631. 3
  632. 3
  633. 3
  634. 3
  635. 3
  636. 3
  637. 3
  638. 3
  639. 3
  640. 3
  641. 3
  642. 3
  643. 3
  644. 3
  645. 3
  646. 3
  647. 3
  648. 3
  649. 3
  650. 3
  651. 3
  652. 3
  653. 3
  654. 3
  655. 3
  656. 3
  657. 3
  658. 3
  659. 3
  660. 3
  661. 3
  662. 2
  663. 2
  664. 2
  665. 2
  666. 2
  667. 2
  668. 2
  669. 2
  670. 2
  671. 2
  672. 2
  673. 2
  674. 2
  675. 2
  676. 2
  677. 2
  678. 2
  679. 2
  680. 2
  681. 2
  682. 2
  683. 2
  684. 2
  685. 2
  686. 2
  687. 2
  688. 2
  689. 2
  690. 2
  691. 2
  692. 2
  693. 2
  694. 2
  695. 2
  696. 2
  697. 2
  698. 2
  699. 2
  700. 2
  701. 2
  702. 2
  703. 2
  704. 2
  705. 2
  706. 2
  707. 2
  708. 2
  709. 2
  710. My 2bit on why the INDI alliance, whose stated aim is not to win to rule but to defeat the BJP, is a nonstarter. The possible constituents are: - All political parties cultivate voter bases – Shiv sena, INC (Muslims, dynasty), Akali, Yadavs, BSP (dalit), JD(U), YSR,. TMC, Biju JD, (all parochial) etc. All the above parties are obviously pursuing diverse politics voic0ing “secular” as only wooing Muslims only because they oppose BJP. It is obvious no one party above will want the other party to dominate. Also as brought out in the discussion, the realization has dawned that hitching a ride with INC will weaken the mostly regional parties in the coalition. One other example why this is an alliance of divergent views… As political parties DMK is no different from BJP. 1. DMK thrives on a platform of ethnic identity whole the BJP is rejuvenating the Bhartiya identity 2. Both are perceived to have alienated a part of their respective electorate – DMK the upper castes (and wooing Muslims) and the BJP the Muslims (and wooing upper castes). 3. Both recall from old literature 4. Both are good administrators –chess Olympiad in 2022 and the recent Global investor forum in Chennai conducted by DMK were as efficient as the G20 functions organized by the BJP. 5. Both are keen on development, progress and delivery to the needy There just is no underlying ideology, except to defeat BJP. If DMK learns Hindi and becomes a National party, it will be better Nationally than most other regional parties or INC.
    2
  711. 2
  712. 2
  713. 2
  714. 2
  715. 2
  716. 2
  717. 2
  718. 2
  719. 2
  720. 2
  721. 2
  722. 2
  723. 2
  724. 2
  725. 2
  726. 2
  727. 2
  728. 2
  729. 2
  730. 2
  731. 2
  732. 2
  733. 2
  734. 2
  735. 2
  736. 2
  737. 2
  738. 2
  739. 2
  740. 2
  741. 2
  742. 2
  743. 2
  744. 2
  745. 2
  746. 2
  747. 2
  748. 2
  749. 2
  750. 2
  751. 2
  752. 2
  753. 2
  754. 2
  755. 2
  756. 2
  757. 2
  758. 2
  759. 2
  760. 2
  761. 2
  762. 2
  763. 2
  764. 2
  765. 2
  766. 2
  767. 2
  768. 2
  769. 2
  770. 2
  771. 2
  772. 2
  773. 2
  774. 2
  775. 2
  776. 2
  777. 2
  778. 2
  779. 2
  780. 2
  781. 2
  782. 2
  783. 2
  784. 2
  785. 2
  786. 2
  787. 2
  788. 2
  789. 2
  790. 2
  791. 2
  792. 2
  793. 2
  794. 2
  795. 2
  796. 2
  797. 2
  798. 2
  799. 2
  800. 2
  801. 2
  802. 2
  803. 2
  804. 2
  805. 2
  806. 2
  807. 2
  808. 2
  809. 2
  810. 2
  811. 2
  812. 2
  813. 2
  814. 2
  815. 2
  816. 2
  817. 2
  818. 2
  819. A good debate in the august house, for a change. If consensus is democracy is our electoral politics the right way to elect governments? If all political parties have to agree on a legislation, why stop at 13. Why not the 100s of other political parties too, who each have a following but are unrepresented in the parliament, for a true consensus? No political dispensation should be allowed to bulldoze if the intend of reforms is anything other than progress and the welfare of the Nation. Facts too have to be presented in the real sense as represented in any bill. For instance, this bill says (paraphrased) that the centre will guide the use of District fund (which is to be used by the Districts to repair the environmental damage caused by mining, but is lying unused by the districts for decades) if it is not used by the districts for the purpose as laid down in a laid down timeframe. This clause is entirely different from usurping the power of the states as presented in this video…yes, English is a difficult language. It can be used and misused with equal dexterity by those who are proficient. But misleading is not a worthy way to use language. If our children and their children are to live in an India which is at least as good or bad as it is now, reforms and privatization have to be implemented with haste. We have already lost decades due to inaction for a variety of reasons. Disclaimer: I am not making a political comment but for a determined Governance so that India does not remain a laggard democracy.
    2
  820. A good programme. My take briefly (though it is long for “comments”). But the a message, which religious leaders and politicians intentionally fail to convey, need to be conveyed (with malice to none) The only permeance in this world is change. There are two facets to any religion. The core message and the methods. While the core message (probably same for all religions) is simple and addresses the inner self the methods are more ethereal and prone to changes as civillisation evolves. Else, we would still be in the vortex of child marriages and the Sati. It is imperative that every religion changes the methods in a multicultural environment. The split of the Catholic churches and the various sects in Islam are a result of such desires for change in methods. There is nothing wrong or blasphemous in changing methods. Even among the followers of Islam, while the Sunnis recommend wearing of Hijab on most occasions, the Shias mandate it only during the offering of prayers. In the context every method prescribed are matters of interpretations. The Hadiths (addons) are but interpretations of what is ordained in the Quaran and should be treated as subjective. Tailpiece: Let me illustrate: In an Iyer marriage the prescription is for the wedding ceremonies to span four days mandating 48 rituals. The Vedas prescribe only seven and many of you will be surprised to learn that wearing the Manglsutra or the Sindhoor (above the forehead or anywhere else) are NOT among them. The followers of a religion tend to add on customs and practices to suit an environment or for mere exploitation – mostly for the latter. The people are made fools and politicians have a field day laughing all the way to the vote bank.
    2
  821. 2
  822. 2
  823. 2
  824. 2
  825. 2
  826. 2
  827. 2
  828. 2
  829. 2
  830. 2
  831. 2
  832. 2
  833. 2
  834. 2
  835. 2
  836. 2
  837. 2
  838. 2
  839. 2
  840. 2
  841. 2
  842. 2
  843. 2
  844. 2
  845. 2
  846. 2
  847. 2
  848. 2
  849. 2
  850. 2
  851. 2
  852. 2
  853. 2
  854. 2
  855. 2
  856. 2
  857. 2
  858. 2
  859. 2
  860. 2
  861. 2
  862. 2
  863. 2
  864. 2
  865. 2
  866. 2
  867. 2
  868. 2
  869. 2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. 2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. 2
  883. 2
  884. 2
  885. 2
  886. 2
  887. 2
  888. 2
  889. 2
  890. 2
  891. 2
  892. 2
  893. 2
  894. 2
  895. 2
  896. 2
  897. 2
  898. 2
  899. 2
  900. 2
  901. 2
  902. 2
  903. 2
  904. 2
  905. 2
  906. 2
  907. 2
  908. 2
  909. 2
  910. 2
  911. 2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918. 2
  919. 2
  920. 2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924. 2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 2
  932. 2
  933. 2
  934. 2
  935. 2
  936. 2
  937. 2
  938. 2
  939. 2
  940. 2
  941. 2
  942. 2
  943. 2
  944. 2
  945. 2
  946. 2
  947. 2
  948. 2
  949. 2
  950. 2
  951. 2
  952. 2
  953. 2
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. Yes, a real test to capitalism in India. Or again, is it? A brief take on its effect on macroeconomy of India… , very briefly, in this case of Adani group of Companies, the major issue raised in the Hindenburg report is the offshore Shell companies (owned by the family, hence violating related party transactions dictate) used for round tripping for inflating the stock prices of group companies to raise capital by pledging the group companies’ thus overvalued securities. Though not correct, yet not new to Indian industries! It is pertinent to note here in this case, that the money so raised has been invested in visible and tangible assets (Ports and cash generating companies etc.) in the country. Thus, the assets of the group exceed loan liabilities with enough cashflow in the group and ability to service the debts in the near term, (3-4 years) as per major lenders in the country. Ports, Power, Cement, Green energy etc. are industries unlikely to fail with potential to continually generate cash. I do not foresee any short term or long-term danger to the Indian economy from this event – gains and losses in the stock market notwithstanding. Yes, the ability to raise fresh capital by the group will be dented and there will be scrutiny and some possible investigations. Tailpiece: My observations are only on the impact on Indian economy and NOT on whether any political party has benefitted (we are in a DEMOCRACY) or on any possible violations by the Group etc. which will reveal itself. Another important point to note is that the aim of Hindenburg is obviously to make money by short selling (That is what this company does for a living) and not “help” Indian economy in any way.
    1
  1017. 1
  1018. Know this, the names of parties and politicians do not matter in the least. We will travel a blinkered path as long as long as people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living. “We the people” have to get out of this rut. The general perception is that corruption always involves money. Even if all political parties dishonestly take Rs. 10,000 crores per year from the exchequer, it will not make any significant difference in progress or development. What hurts most is that all political parties are ethically corrupt and they carry practice into matters of governance as well. The modus operandi is not important to the point being made here. Also there is not enough place here to discuss the kaleidoscopic overt and covert unethical practices of these parties. The politicians and the media by their utterances channelize our feelings and not our thoughts. This exploitation of feelings may sound the death knell of liberal democracy in India and all over the world. Democracies are but a puppet show where the people are controlled by emotional strings. Feelings are not cosmic powers. They surely do not reflect “free will”. In the wake of the aforesaid, the role played by the media in democracies is also suspect. You see, Caesar's wife has to be above suspicion. Is SHE? Tailpiece: While in all democracies across the world people go out and vote, in India the electorate cast(e) their vote! This is but just one small aberration among a million transgressions.
    1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. DK, a bit long. Allow me to Political parties have been accepting donations, mostly in cash (black money, God knows where it went) since decades. Since the Bond scheme, donations have been through the bank. All (especially National level) political parties have received such donations…. Some more, some less, some MUCH more. It is documented and can be seen as soon as the key is found in the dog poo. It is very evident that BJP has got not one Lion’s but “a pride of Lions’s” share of the bond donations probably following the basic psychology of backing a winner. Usually, corruption is established by following the money trail. In the case of electoral bonds, money trails are crystal clear and it is all in white. The donations are reflected in the books of the donor as well as the receiver. An improvement from the old system, definitely. Donations to political parties are not illegal. A watertight case has to be proved in the courts of law to establish direct quid pro quo with Government (Center or State). Comments and commentaries by all and sundry and the ‘experts” at best can be aimed at swaying the electorate against the incumbent governments (who are the major beneficiaries) before the elections with allegations (some may be even true) of quid pro quo, connecting some dots. No real effect unless proved in Court of Law as said earlier It will be interesting to see how the opposition will leverage the issue (if at all) and the whole post Bond effect will unravel. Note: The opinion of the honorable SC in relation to the unconstitutionality is not on the donations but in the opaqueness of the procedure.
    1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. Let us look at the larger picture within which India has to strategise its policies in the neighbourhood. For the present we have to assume that as a sovereign Nation our sole intention is to Defend our borders. We have a situation where we cannot chose our neighbours, at least two of who are unreliable across contentious and treacherous borders (in as much as, when both sides claim the same piece of land, it becomes contentious). We have seen that with China and Pakistan, diplomacy can take us only so far.The ultimate intention of our hostile neighbours is to keep India under wraps and not allow it to grow into any sort of regional / world power.The only strategy with India, in the circumstance, is a two pronged approach. 1. Develop and maintain a well equipped and highly motivated Defence force as all major powers are doing. This entails high expenditure. 2. Develop the Nation as a self sustaining (not a closed door policy) economy - a robust domestic defence industry is paramount to sustain the economy in which high Defence spending (point 1 above) is imperative. The money spent on importing the much required equipment, if channeled into the domestic manufacturing, while supplying the Defence with the much needed equipment, will generate many jobs as well as enhance our GDP. It is easier said than done. We have to make a start some time and any time is not too late. To succeed, the domestic manufacturing sector should become highly quality conscious. In regard to the minor (but important) neighbours, we need to realize that no country can live on love and free air. There is always a quid pro quo. We have to be in a position that being a friend of India becomes highly beneficial to the friend. We can discuss methods till the cows come home. We have to map our actions against this larger picture.
    1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483.  @vinaysharma5675  Vinay, thanks for your perspective. Respect it. The people (samaj?),including the vegetable vendor, have to be definitely told off when they repeatedly violate rules and instructions. In extension of what I said earlier consider the following with a non-partisan view. ( this is my complete observation commentated and published on the digital print platform on the same matter) Role of the media: When the media constantly berate only the politicians, specially from the ruling party (NOT A RECENT PHENOMENON BUT SINCE DECADES) for all ills, they do two things. 1. Abdicate the responsibility of informing the public of the reality of affairs. 2. Make the public complacent by exonerating them from all wrong doings (like not following road discipline, wearing mask etc.), by putting the blame for all wrongs on the administration, rightly or wrongly, always and every time. Choice with people in a democracy: In this instance, in our democracy, the people had a choice to attend or not attend the rallies and to wear the masks if they decide to attend. I will not blame the politicians that some people attended rallies without wearing masks. Choice with the administration in a democracy: Also, can somebody tell me whether the CEC has the authority (if not does anybody else have?) to prohibit all political rallies, in the wake of constitutionally mandated elections and conduct voting etc. without campaigning? Could the Parliament have taken such a decision with 2/3 majority (else, I know, majoritarianism and tyranny will kick in) Tailpiece: Such reports as this article are all old wine in old bottles and will serve no purpose in Nation building. I wish the media address real issues that matter. we all want a safe and prosperous India. Regards
    1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. Being a cricket fan SG should know that a Captain is as good as his team; especially when a key member of the team is media. Of course we understand the limitations of a career political journalist. Expert epidemiologists could have pin pointed the real reasons for the unprecedented spread of the virus. Putting things in perceptive even if the impact factor of Lancet Journal is 59.103. COVID pandemic is unprecedented . Factors affecting the spread are complex. India is a Nation with a population of 13664 lakhs; USA 3282 lakhs (all 2019 figures given here only for comparison). Per capita GDP (IMF data), USA $68319; India $2191. Total Covid Cases USA: 33,452,985:: India: 22,295,911: Total deaths: USA 595,587 India: 242,398 New cases yesterday: USA 35289: India 409 300. (COVID info from worldometer.info) I am not even talking percentages. I also wonder whether there is a lancet study on handling COVID in the USA, Europe, UK etc... It is a pandemic, not an epidemic or common flu. Things that will move the needle the most—are things that past events give us little to no guide about, especially a viral pandemic mutating fast and tomorrow it may mutate faster than the speed of light (figuratively) and be able to travel in the air. Hopefully it will not come to that and humanity will survive this pandemic. There will be unprecedented events. Their unprecedented nature means we won’t be prepared for them, which is part of what makes them so impactful. Tailpiece: Before I get the bricks, I often wonder who is a bakht and who is a Kambhakt?
    1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. Sorry SG. The heading is totally misleading... In gist the policy... The good At school level the major shift from present input driven assessment ( “do it the way I have taught you & don’t use your brains”) to learning outcome driven assessment is the proverbial paradigm shift that was much needed. This will make children understand concepts, question theories, hypothesis, postulates & brainmap what they have assimilated to be subsequently applied to finding a solution to the problems faced. No scope for rote learning here.  This is our chance to grab this NEP & make it our own. There will be far too much of opposition & every hurdle will be placed in its implementation. It will do us well to keep bureaucrats out of it, bring in genuine educationists to make it happen & steamroll every opposition & hurdle coming in its way. The bad Ruling dispensations in States hostile to the Centre May not like NCERT & HECI subsuming state Edn boards & Universities. Even the change in role of state govt Edn depts from lording over all Edn institutions in the state to being mere enablers of Edn entrusted with the responsibility of ensuring quality Edn in govt schools will not be taken lightly by power hungry & corrupt bureaucrats.  Politicians particularly the corrupt ones won’t like the general population to be well educated for they will be asked questions by their voters.  The ugly Left liberals given their substantially high level of intelligence will fight this policy tooth & nail for their mass base of uneducated / unemployed will further erode.
    1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. SG has rightly said at the beginning of his piece that a spoken word, like all else, is a matter of interpretation and perception. A balanced analysis. But is there something more to democracy than perception? For instance, constitutional rights will have a different appeal for me, a professional soldier, from SG, a professional political journalist. Also, language, even one’s own mother tongue, is a fascinating medium of communication for anybody. The same expression will convey differently at different times depending on, among many factors, the context, intention and tone. In these times, I see that most people listen only to what one wants to hear. When even in our hallowed Parliament it has been eons since we have had a meaningful democratic discussion on matters of National importance. In the media we can discern line of arguments just by knowing the author or commentator. Too much democracy or too little? Here are two examples. 1. In the USA schools do no mandate uniform unlike some school in India and the UK. 2. Unlike in the USA Indian parliament does not allow for conscience vote (they wield the Whip), so an elected member’s “freedom” ends there. It is for each one of us to discern where we should draw the line, to decide how much of democracy is not too much. There is a view that India is not progressing as it is a laggard democracy. May be democracy also does not mean that a Nation can never speak in one voice. In the circumstance to earn and spend as one entity is a far cry, though not impossible. Tail piece: Are hartals and protests which violate the freedom of millions of citizens by disrupting / destroying public conveniences, par for the course in a democracy? There has to be a limit to everything. There is an old saying in Malayalam – translated, “Too much of Amrit is poison”.
    1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. Let us not assume that somethings are more right than the other. Everything is not always reflected in data in India, though data analytics is the go to mantra. It is OK if the data is OK. Consider this. As an example, let us take one aspect of women’s employment and look at some situations in India. One fact that is very important to note is that every citizen in the “developed world” has a unique identity and every employment even as a housemaid is reported through this unique identity such as a social security number, in the USA. The data is near dead accurate. The USA reports unemployment rates weekly to monitor its economy which is not done through measuring inflation as in India. In India, many employments, mostly of women, are not recorded. For instance, more than 80% of the house holds in Bangalore, my city, employ maids. Have you ever seen a database for such employment? About 30% of road side vegetable and fruit vendors in my locality are women. There is also an iron lady (a lady who irons clothes) in my colony. I play golf (which is an economy that affords employment to a considerable number of men and women) considered a sin by many and resented as a snobbish sport. There are many caddies (employed in golf courses) in Bangalore who hail from UP, Bihar, WB and Assam. Most of them live single with their wives tending the small plots of land back home, cultivating seasonal crops, some vegetables and rearing a cow (buffalo) or two. I wonder if these employments are accounted for. Nobody here reports these expenditures / incomes. Tailpiece: India is still unique. It requires Genius of a different kind to take it forward.
    1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. Shekhar Gupta, in an uncanny way, raises issues of expansionism reminiscent of eighteenth century and earlier. In many ways his (un)guarded insinuation is not misplaced. But there are differences. He has explained the major one – the “Akhand” aspect. While in the case of China it is a state policy, it is more an “idea” with India and only “Kashmir” as a sentimental issue with Pakistan. All other developments in this regard are fallout. In the case of Kashmir, I will say that it is important for India for its defence more than the sentiment. The strategic importance of Kashmir for defence of Indian mainland though not discussed(need not be too) in public, is a major factor in the scheme of defending our Northern borders. Letting JK go any which way is strategically detrimental to India’s Defence. With Pakistan, it is more of a matter of sentiment than history or geography. Sans ego and sentiments very easily resolvable. China, as evidenced by ts actions worldwide, is truly in the mould of real geographic expansionism. Between India and China it is the traditional border dispute – the only land border dispute in the World today. The border was never ever defined anytime in history. As mature Nations the dispute should and could have been settled in the past decades. For many varied reasons it was not to be. Rest assured, as is normal with negotiations, in any settlement with China, with or without war, notwithstanding the “winner”, a lot of give and take will happen in case of a border settlement. What do they say in business? Any crisis can be converted to an opportunity? SWOT analysis they call it - right?
    1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. Kerrie the mystery deepens...you chose.... secularism Also found in: Thesaurus, Financial, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia. sec·u·lar·ism (sĕk′yə-lə-rĭz′əm) n. 1. Religious skepticism or indifference. 2. The view that religious considerations should be excluded from civil affairs or public education. sec′u·lar·ist n. sec′u·lar·is′tic adj. American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. Copyright © 2016 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved. secularism (ˈsɛkjʊləˌrɪzəm) n 1. (Philosophy) philosophy a doctrine that rejects religion, esp in ethics 2. the attitude that religion should have no place in civil affairs 3. the state of being secular ˈsecularist n, adj ˌsecularˈistic adj secular (ˈsɛkjʊlə) adj 1. of or relating to worldly as opposed to sacred things; temporal 2. not concerned with or related to religion 3. not within the control of the Church 4. (Education) (of an education, etc) a. having no particular religious affinities b. not including compulsory religious studies or services 5. (Ecclesiastical Terms) (of clerics) not bound by religious vows to a monastic or other order 6. occurring or appearing once in an age or century 7. lasting for a long time 8. (Astronomy) astronomy occurring slowly over a long period of time: the secular perturbation of a planet's orbit. n 9. (Ecclesiastical Terms) a member of the secular clergy 10. another word for layman
    1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. Very briefly and loosely, only as an indicator to channelize your thoughts, who could have done what to prevent a surge in COVID cases? Let us take e brief look. 1. Constitutional authorities could have taken Suo moto cognizance at various stages and ordered a) rescinding polls b) introduction of lockdown c) Cancelling religious congregations d) closure of cinema halls or whatever, if they felt (not as an afterthought) any actions that could have prevented the spread of COVID. 2. Central government could have postponed elections and introduced Governors’ rule in the states due for a change of legislature. (I am not sure how this is possible; may be the parliament could have done it) 3. The oppositions parties could have demanded postponement of elections and introduction of Governors’ rule in the states due for a change of legislature. (I am not sure how this is possible; may be the parliament could have done it) 4. The media could have started a Nationwide discussion on postponement of elections and cancellation of the Kumbh. They did not do it though these were well within their capability and responsibility. 5. The hospitals (hats off to them, they are doing yeomen service) could have foreseen the requirement of remdesivir and oxygen and placed orders accordingly well in advance (say two months back) in their normal supply chain. 6. PILs could have been initiated for all or any of the above and more… 7. So many people could have done so many different things….. But none of these happened. It is a pandemic, not an epidemic or common flu. Things that will move the needle the most—are things that past events give us little to no guide about, when a viral pandemic is mutating fast and tomorrow it may mutate faster than the speed of light (figuratively) and be able to travel in the air. Hopefully it will not come to that and humanity will survive this pandemic. There will be unprecedented events. Their unprecedented nature means we won’t be prepared for them, which is part of what makes them so impactful. The choice is between a rock and a hard place - lives or livelihoods; both are important and both if not saved case destruction. What is your choice? Tailpiece: Anybody can be wise in hindsight. We the people expect maturity, calmness responsible behaviour from the media and all other pillars of democracy.
    1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1