Comments by "Awesome Avenger" (@awesomeavenger2810) on "Don't buy the lie. To oppose the government is not sabotage – Paul Mason | In my opinion" video.

Orwell also warned of communists. Noting the present Labour leadership, that sounds as relevant now as it was back in 1945.
4
infinitejest It just does, ok? Don't ask awkward questions. Immigration has to be no less than 300,000 a year. Just because.
3
Paul Mason is part of the media elite. There is a reason why Corbyn's Labour party are being called saboteurs. It's because they are. They want to sabotage Brexit negotiations purely for political reasons. While the lib dems want to ignore the referendum again and again until they get the result they want.
2
Then he should back the government in getting the best deal for the UK. But he won't. Like his loyal acolytes, he is pathological in his hatred of the tories. IRA terrorists and Hamas Jihadists are fine. But he draws the line at his political opposition at home.
2
Corbyn is so woefully politically naive (or stupid), he expects the government to set out its 'red lines' before the negotiations even begin. But what happens if Brussels says no? Corbyn gonna ask again? He gonna come back to the UK and say that Brexit is off because he can't get what he wants? There are two sides in these negotiations. And Corbyn is very much on the wrong side.
2
Corbyn's red lines are: ◾Fair migration system for UK business and communities ◾Retaining strong, collaborative relationship with EU ◾Protecting national security and tackling cross-border crime ◾Delivering for all nations and regions of the UK ◾Protecting workers' rights and employment protections ◾Ensuring same benefits currently enjoyed within single market Now, the first line has nothing to do with Brexit at all. The second very much depends on Brussels. The third, again has nothing to do with Brexit (Corbyn would fail on this completely btw). Neither does the forth. Or the Fifth. And the sixth 'Ensuring same benefits currently enjoyed within single market' is impossible unless the other side agree. And they have stated clearly that they won't. So clearly Commissar Corbyn is playing politics at the expense of getting the best deal for the UK. So when I ask 'what happens if Brussels says no (to ensuring the same benefits currently enjoyed within the single market), and you say ''er, none of that makes sense'' it shows you haven't the slightest clue of what Corbyn is demanding. As for your complete lack of confidence in the UK's ability to make trade deals with America and India and Jamaica and Australia, I would simply ask, if Australia, Jamaica, India, and the US can make trade deals, then why not us? And spare me the NHS Fear Campaign. Labour play that card during EVERY SINGLE ELECTION!
2
Right. So, if Brussels says NO, what then? Its a red line, remember? It's not an aspiration. What would Commissar Corbyn do? Would he threaten Brussels by saying the UK won't leave unless they give him what he wants? Will he write them a strongly worded letter? What? Because right now, all the EU has to do is to say NO, and its guaranteed that Corbyn will vote against the government!
1
And that's exactly as I have told it. Commissar Corbyn is playing politics. He knows very well that there are two sides in the negotiations. The government is hoping to get the best deal for the UK. But any deal must be agreed upon by the other side. So if Brussels says NO to ''Ensuring the same benefits currently enjoyed within the single market'' what does that mean exactly? That Corbyn is voting against the government because the EU wasn't willing to play ball? Logic clearly isn't your thing, is it?
1
Commissar Corbyn is the leader of the Labour party. He is not just one vote. He sets the policy of his party. So it is legitimate to want to know what he would do if he were in power. All the more so because we're having an election. So if one of his demands during the negotiations is 'Ensuring the same benefits currently enjoyed within the single market' then the question is how would he guarantee this? And what he would do if Brussels said NO?
1
Don't you mean 'who is PM?'
1
What?
1
The Legislative Assembly of the Russian Leningrad Region has prepared a draft law that would essentially prohibit children younger than 14 years old to use social media, Russian lawmaker Vladimir Petrov said. MOSCOW — According to the draft bill, the administration of social services would have to check the identity of everyone who wants to register, including both Russian and foreign citizens. Violation of the law would be punishable by a fine of 100,000-300,000 rubles ($1,790-$5,360) for the owner of the website and of 1,000-3,000 rubles for the user. "For the sake of public security we need to introduce the principle of general verification of all users [They want to know where you live], and that is only possible from the moment a citizen gets a passport, at 14 years of age. No one is trying to introduce censorship or limit the freedom of speech, verification and strict identity control will only increase the value of public opinion and virtual communication," Petrov said, as quoted by the Russian Izvestia newspaper. Users would also be allowed to only create one page under their real names, with the violation punishable by fines both for the website and the user. Several other restrictions would be introduced for the users under 18, such as the ban on selling any goods to minors via social media. The draft bill also prohibits spreading information about unauthorized rallies and demonstrations, as well as publishing other people’s correspondence without their consent. [No publishing incriminating emails] According to the newspaper, the draft bill is expected to be introduced to the State Duma on Wednesday -Sputnik News
1
You're free to use you free speech however you like Michael Fey. And other people are free not to employ you if they don't like what you say.
1
Commissar Corbyn. Communist traitor.
1
Orwell would've recognised Corbyn and his extremist followers for what they are.
1
Orwell learned from his mistakes. And was man enough to admit when he had picked the wrong side. And, knowing what we know about Commissar Corbyn and the type of people he mixes with, Orwell wouldn't go anywhere near that shrivelled ol' Marxist fraud.
1
Down With The Patriarchal Communist!
1