Comments by "Awesome Avenger" (@awesomeavenger2810) on "Infowars debate: Should it have been banned?" video.

  1. These media platforms are private enterprises. Advertisers don't want their products associated with people like Alex Jones. It's bad for business. And Facebook, Spotify and YouTube are businesses set up to run a profit. So Alex Jones is not being denied freedom of speech. He just doesn't have the right to be propped up by companies advertising on Facebook, Spotify, and Youtube, when he harms their image. After all, Infowars decides its own content, why shouldn't they?
    9
  2. Couple days ago Mars pulled their advertising from YouTube because they were appearing on violent drill videos. That harms their image. And therefore their sales. People don't have the right to demand private companies pay for their point of view. So sure, Alex Jones can speak. Just not on Facebook, Spotify or YouTube. As he harms their image, and the image of those who advertise on their media platforms.
    3
  3. Couple days ago Mars pulled all advertising from youtube because their ads were appearing on violent drill videos. There are consequences for shitting on your own, and everyone else's, doorstep. Alex Jones is now learning that lesson.
    3
  4. No. It isn't. But then some of us aren't on a race to the bottom.
    2
  5. ...And the opposite of Antifa and BLM is not Alex Jones. It is sanity.
    2
  6. Don't we all have a responsibility for the society we live in?
    1