Comments by "Awesome Avenger" (@awesomeavenger2810) on ""Flying While Muslim" - Marched off a plane for reading a text?" video.

  1. So you think the average Muslim would join a murderous death cult (who's victims are mostly other Muslims) because they got question by police on a plane? Idk what type of Muslims you mix it with, but the ones I know would be fuckin horrified that you would even suggest such a thing!    
    1
  2. Your stupidity. And your desperate attempt to make out Muslims are victimised and discriminated against. If that were the case, you would see them fleeing the country as they do in Syria. Rather than desperate to get in. You are the worst kind of apologist for Islamic terrorism. Instead of seeing ISIS as the murderous psychopathic fascists that they are, you clearly believe they are fighting against some sort of injustice. Would it have been understandable if, having seen the carnage in Nice, the non-Muslim majority in France took to the streets and lynched every Muslim they could find? After all, on the scale of things what was the greater injustice? 84 people being run down by a Islamist lunatic in a truck, or the police being overly cautious at a time of heightened security by questioning three comfortable middle class Muslim air passengers? People can see through your excuses. It is not justifiable to carry out murder because a few passengers were questioned by police. Or because someone drew a fuckin cartoon. Or wrote a book. Or 'disrespected' your beliefs. And the vast majority of Muslims understand this. Sadly, however, you seem to think it is in some perverted way excusable. That is why you are a fuckin mug.   
    1
  3. Muslims join ISIS because three comfortable middle class western Muslims are questioned on a plane? I see. So nothing to do with violently intolerant religious indoctrination. Xenophobia. Extremist rhetoric. And carefully nurtured grievance and conspiracies? I noticed how you made mention of the 'Greek Cypriot' that runs EasyJet. Did he put in a quick call to the airport police to order them to inconvenience three Muslim passengers as vengeance for the Turks nabbing half his island? Is that how this works? Maybe the chief of Essex police is a Jew! But then I guess if you think your average Muslim is so easy triggered into mass murder, its only good sense we be extra cautious. Am I right?         
    1
  4. And btw. Its not an ad hominem if it is in response to a question.
    1
  5. So your list of reasons why Muslims join ISIS is basically anyone who dares to question Islam. With the BNP, EDL, and PEGIDA thrown in to make it look legitimate. One, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, is an ex-muslim who campaigns for women's rights. An extremely brave, caring, and good person. And Sam Harris is a liberal atheist. Until, I suppose, he criticises Islam. In fact, Islamic terrorism was around long before PEGIDA and the EDL. So they cannot be the reason. Your little wish list doesn't explain anything. As most Islamic terrorism is carried out against Muslims in Muslim countries. Basically, you seem to think by using the word 'Islamophobia' you can silence anyone who disagrees with Islam. It don't work like that tho. Islam is a belief. And just like any other belief, whether religious or political, it is open to ridicule, criticism, and dislike. That will not change. And the more you attempt to explain away Islamist terrorism by pointing to insignificant incidents like the one in this news report, the more fuckin ridiculous you look.       
    1
  6. As for what question I was replying to and your incorrect usage of 'ad hominem', go back and read. I ain't here to hold your hand.
    1
  7. If you care to look back you will see I answered your question about five posts ago. And yes, to a woman who suffered the worst excesses of Islam, I'm guessing that to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, it did indeed feel as oppressive as national socialism. Anders Breivik may well have liked what she says, but then Osama bin Laden rather liked what Muhammad had to say did he not? And Sam Harris judges Islam (and by extension ALL Muslims) by their scriptures and nothing else?! What other method would he use to judge a religion other than by its scriptures? The quality of the paper? ...And btw. I wouldn't make a thing about my spelling EDL as EDF. Its not big or clever. Especially considering your own piss-poor spelling in your last comment. 
    1
  8. Its like having a conversation with a fuckin parrot. But anyhow, you will notice I wrote 'about five posts ago'. That is now the second time those words have been repeated, so I'm sure you can work out what that means without further instruction. But to sum up what we have so far. No, I do not believe that your average Muslim would carry out murder because three comfortably middle class western Muslims got questioned by the police on an air flight at a time of heightened risk of Islamist terrorism. And for you to suggest they would, is both insulting to Muslims in general (as it portrays them as violent and illogical psychopaths waiting to be triggered) and dangerous (as you simply confirm the worst opinions of what an average Muslim is like).    
    1
  9. Check my reply ABOUT five posts ago. I ain't in the habit of repeating myself. That's your thing.   
    1
  10. "Muslims join ISIS because three comfortable middle class western Muslims are questioned on a plane? I see. So nothing to do with violently intolerant religious indoctrination. Xenophobia. Extremist rhetoric. And carefully nurtured grievance and conspiracies? I noticed how you made mention of the 'Greek Cypriot' that runs EasyJet. Did he put in a quick call to the airport police to order them to inconvenience three Muslim passengers as vengeance for the Turks nabbing half his island? Is that how this works? Maybe the chief of Essex police is a Jew! But then I guess if you think your average Muslim is so easy triggered into mass murder, its only good sense we be extra cautious. Am I right?''         
    1
  11. Maybe that whole paragraph when straight over your head?
    1
  12. Violently intolerant religious indoctrination. Xenophobia. Extremist rhetoric. And carefully nurtured grievance and conspiracy theories. These are the things that are responsible for Islamic terrorism.   
    1
  13. And yet the EDL, BNP, UKIP, the daily mail, the express, the sun, fox news, Sam Harris, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, PEGIDA, Tommy Robinson, Pat Condell, and Britain First do not exist in Muslim countries. But Islamic terrorism does. So clearly you are wrong to say those listed are responsible for Islamic terrorism.   
    1
  14. You seem to be implying that the three people in this video are now members of ISIS. They aren't. And no, the victims of ISIS in Islamic countries are not 'just as Islamic' as the terrorists. ISIS represents an extreme version of Islam. Moreover, ISIS has recruited followers from all over the world. So, once again, the reason why people join ISIS cannot be the EDL, BNP, UKIP, the daily mail, the express, the sun, fox news, Sam Harris, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, PEGIDA, Tommy Robinson, Pat Condell, or Britain First.    
    1
  15. Yes. As I have pointed out many times already, the majority of ISIS victims are indeed Muslim. However, according to ISIS they are not Islamic enough. In reply to your last question, you seem to be having trouble understanding my answer. As I have already answered that question twice already.    
    1
  16. Your question 'where does the extremist ISIS version of Islam come from?' has a pretty obvious answer. It comes from a literal interpretation of the Qur'an. A belief that the words of a man who lived thousands of years ago are the words of god and must therefore be strictly enforced. No deviation is allowed. It is violently intolerant of other beliefs and speaking out against the Qur'an or refusing to live by its rules is considered blasphemy. It is religious fascism.    
    1
  17. And no. I will not answer the same question a third time.
    1
  18. I'm guessing they seem themselves as such yeah.
    1
  19. GeoNeilUK Are will still doing this? I mean, you don't seem to have had an argument. You don't even seem to know what you are talking about.
    1
  20. GeoNeilUK I don't even know what you are arguing about. Do you? I've answered your questions and I think anyone who reads this will see that you are just coming across as confused. Move on with your life. I have.
    1
  21. GeoNeilUK Where did I say that?
    1
  22. GeoNeilUK You added the 'according to you' bit. I didn't.
    1
  23. See those jumble of letters above? They're not randomly generated. They make up words. And those words make sentences. Read them and you will uncover the mystery of my argument.
    1
  24. Why does it matter what I think? I'm not the one lopping off peoples heads.  
    1
  25. No. You do. That's why you said ''Essex Police and EasyJet (ran by a Greek Cypriot) are engaging in a little bit of a Daesh recruitment drive'' Its pretty clear you think Muslims are easily triggered into carrying out murder.
    1
  26. Of course. It takes years of religious brainwashing to produce a member of ISIS  
    1
  27. Would you attack total strangers with a meat clever or drive a truck through a group of people because of this?
    1
  28. Did I naturally assume you were Muslim? Where did I say that?
    1
  29. You assumed that I assumed you were Muslim.  
    1
  30. I didn't assume you were Muslim. So your question is pointless.
    1
  31. I didn't assume you were Muslim. So your question is pointless.
    1
  32. I would refer you to the answer I gave earlier. On both questions.
    1
  33. Your first question is based on your incorrect assumption that I assumed you were Muslim. So the question is pointless. Your second question has already been answered several times.
    1
  34. You can keep asking the same questions over and over again, but you'll get the same answer.
    1
  35. Those are things you have said. Not me.
    1
  36. Because I didn't say those things. I could just as easily ask you why you claimed to be the first man on the moon.  
    1
  37. Why did you claim to be the first man on the moon? You weren't. Neil Armstrong was.
    1
  38. (Then your assumptions were wrong)  Why did you claim to be the first man on the moon? You weren't. Neil Armstrong was.
    1
  39. Your mistake was to assume something that was wrong. Now tell me why you think you were the first man on the moon.
    1
  40. I've gotta ask. Are you brain damaged or something? Because you clearly have a problem with taking in information.
    1