Comments by "Awesome Avenger" (@awesomeavenger2810) on "TalkTV" channel.

  1. Just build 2 billion tree houses - kill two birds with one stone
    89
  2. The ECJ ruling on UK constitutional matters. That kinda proves the leave campaign's point. And its no good politicians complaining that the public is out of step with them on Brexit. All the main political parties promised to respect the referendum result before it happened. And before the last election. If they now find themselves unable to do that, they shouldn't have lied.
    37
  3. Lucky the Jew hating bigot didn't win... wait, what?
    28
  4. Corbyn has always been supportive of sectarian/racial violence when it furthers his agenda. He's only pacifist when it comes to defending liberal democracy and its values. Things he has no interest in.
    23
  5. ''...I'm absolutely astonished that I'm agreeing so much with a royal'' - Says the unelected Baroness that sits in the house of Lords because she has a title.
    19
  6. The far right is a joke. The real threat comes from the far left. And they now run the labour party.
    19
  7. Just can't do it, can she? If Netanyahu is lying, and Hamas hostage takers are not given amnesty, so what? The hostages are free and those that took them hostage are held to account. I fail to see the downside to that. And as she thinks Netanyahu is a liar anyway, what's her issue? Maybe, its because she recognizes that the hostages are one of Hamas' few cards they have left to play? And a defeat of Hamas is just too terrible a thought for her to contemplate?
    18
  8. This anti-Israel obsession is now mainstream on the left wing.
    17
  9. They won't just come after you. They'll come after your children too.
    17
  10. The one consolation being that Heseltine will no longer be stinking up UK politics.
    14
  11. It's because Corbynism is built on vacuous virtue signalling. And those in the entertainment business need to appear virtuous, in order to retain their credibility while making themselves lots of money. Virtue signalling costs nothing. It requires no understanding from them of the issue. It avoids the need for them to recognise reality, or to make difficult, unpopular decisions that may be necessary. And at the end of the day, you bear no responsibility for anything.
    11
  12. I remember how James O'Brian, in an attempt to make out the EU was a non-issue, liked to ask Brexit voters ''Can you name one way in which the EU effects your life?''. Well, like JHB says, we are now finding out just how stupid that question is.
    11
  13. Johnson has set a trap that his critics would have to be (and are) stupid to fall into. Because most people know what the burka is designed to do. Even his critics know what it's designed to do. You can't loudly commit yourself to equality and woman's rights and not know. He's made them look weak, two-faced, and hypocritical.
    10
  14. Don't see any interest from Corbyn and his supporters in, say, Pakistan and its horrendous human rights record regarding religous minorities. No interest at all in Iran's vile human rights history (in fact, the dear leader himself used to work for Tehran's propaganda channel PressTV). And Corbyn has nothing to say about the mass murdering Assad regime in Syria (in fact, many of his allies are pro-Assad). So what's with his obsession with Israel?
    9
  15. What about dead people? They can't even get to conferences! Never mind hear whats being said!
    9
  16. The whole concept of a 'hate crime' is ridiculous. A victim of a physical attack isnt any worse off because it was a 'hate crime', than any other victim of a physical attack. The attack was carried out with malice either way. Only when it comes to 'hate crimes', one victim is elevated above another because of their race, gender, sexuality, etc). The problem with that is there are countless other reasons for hating people (age, class, education, wealth, politics, etc). And if you're logical, those too must be labelled hate crimes. Otherwise we're going to end up with people like Laurie Perry deciding who is more of a victim than who, based on her own personal prejudices. And they are many.
    9
  17. It's difficult to know who to detest more. But I think it has to be Galloway. The guy who lends his support to people 100 times worse than anyone Robinson has ever met. And gets paid very well for it.
    9
  18. When Corbyn supports terrorists who want to blow you up, it's his way of saying he wants to be your prime minister
    8
  19. Well this is a step backwards
    7
  20. Did Campbell and the remain campaign ever mention before the referendum that in their view leaving the EU was an impossibility ? Why not? Could it be because he wanted people to think they had a choice on EU membership, when in reality his opinion is that they really don't?
    7
  21. ...says Galloway, the rabid anti-Semite.
    7
  22. Yes he did. And apparently he wrote a book about how to be right in a world gone wrong.
    7
  23. Stop Brexit so Lord Adonis can check your ID - No thanx
    7
  24. Notice the shift away from 'we will respect the referendum result' to 'there may have to be another referendum' to finally 'we want to rerun the referendum'.
    6
  25. Some people are still in denial over the kremlin's chemical attack in the UK. Might I suggest forced deportation to Russia?
    6
  26. Remember that Jeremy Corbyn spent much of his political 'career' sitting next to this rabid old man.
    6
  27. Can't really tell the difference between the far right and Corbyn's far left.
    6
  28. The fact that Tom Watson is considered a moderate within the labour party at the moment says a lot about the state of the labour party
    6
  29. Icke playing the clown again. Basically, he's just a paranoid narcissist that not so long ago proclaimed himself the 'son of the godhead', and who believes in shape shifting lizards. He mixes in a bit of The Matrix, or whatever other movie he's recently seen, adds a bit of third rate guru bullcrap, repeats vacuous mantras with the words 'love', 'reality', and 'illusion' randomly switched around, and then takes vast sums of cash from an audience even more mentally deranged than himself - Because while reality may be an illusion, David Icke's bank balance is very real indeed.
    6
  30. Bare in mind, Galloway makes over £60,000 a year working for Putin's propaganda channel RT (he made over £100,000 working for Iran's PressTV too!) .
    6
  31. Talking of doing deals with the devil - just watch how the remain campaign swing their weight behind an anti-Semitic Trot with a history of supporting extremists and terrorists
    6
  32. Galloway makes his riches working for the ayatollah, so obviously he would support Iran.
    6
  33. What are you talking about? The media are obsessed with Palestine.
    6
  34. No sane person believes that Laura Pillock or her clown party will do anything other than bankrupt the country
    5
  35. Corbyn spent most of his political 'career' sitting on the back benches next to Galloway.
    5
  36. Fans shouldn't go to Russia at all. Neither should the England team. It would be like reenacting the 1936 Berlin Olympics.
    5
  37. Exactly so. With communism you still get the mass pollution. And worse. But live in poverty.
    5
  38. 'Extinction rebellion' were threatening to fly drones near airport runways not so long ago. If they thought that was a good idea who knows what they're capable of doing?
    5
  39. Not the first time this has happened tho, is it? Russian assassins who poisoned Litvinenko left a trail of radioactivity leading back to Russia across half of Europe. Nekrassov knows the kind of regime Putin leads. Most Russians do. But if you believe the standard kremlin response, then Putin must be the luckiest dictator in the world. His foreign enemies assassinate all his domestic rivals, and his foes on the battlefield constantly bomb themselves with chemical weapons. All just to make him look bad - You must be seriously stupid to believe that.
    5
  40. No. He'll share someone else's.
    5
  41. Nope. This is how the Putin regime operates both in Russia and abroad.
    5
  42. Corbyn has a lack of moral clarity full stop.
    5
  43. You have to marvel at the ego of the guy
    5
  44. Is there perhaps a way you could blame this attack on Israel, George? Perhaps it supplied the nerve agent like your 'theory' that Israel supplies al Qaeda with chemical weapons in Syria? You could base your idea on nothing but a hatred of Jews and the western world in general. And if you said it on Iranian tv, you could get very well paid for it too!
    5
  45. These are actually anti-capitalists.
    5
  46. 'Big words'. Lol. And which words specifically are you impressed by? 'Credibility'? 'Understanding'? Or 'at'?
    4
  47. Because Jeremy Corbyn doesn't like jews, Boris Johnson can't dislike the burka?
    4
  48. KGB colonel Putin must be the luckiest dictator in the world. His foreign foes assassinate all his opponents for him, and enemy fighters continually use chemical weapons on themselves! - With enemies like that, who needs friends?
    4
  49. Corbyn's Labour: Appeasement.
    4
  50. I'm guessing Galloway is worrying about what effect this all might have on his bank balance.
    4
  51. Why should UK politics revolve around the far left's obsession with Israel and its phony concern for the people of Palestine? They have nothing to say about the Iranian regime. In fact, Corbyn called it 'progressive' (and even worked for their PressTV propaganda channel). What about the Assad regime and its use of chemical weapons? They couldn't be less interested in that. So why always Israel?
    4
  52. No, McDonnell. People didn't vote for a Venezuelan-style 'economic miracle', they didn't vote for sectarian terrorism, massive job loses, economic meltdown, and extreme anti-Semitism. They voted for Theresa May and the tories. Which is why you're still in opposition.
    4
  53. ''...A highly unusual hit'' No it's not. The Russians did the same to Litvinenko.
    4
  54. The price for Corbyn getting flack for supporting terrorists, is that now no one is allowed to have an opinion on the burka?
    4
  55. Comrade COB has spent his entire political 'career' being a useful idiot to extremists.
    4
  56. He's a very good liar
    4
  57. We honestly can't draw any conclusions from the 'People's March'. No matter how many turn up to it. As it might very well be that in the time between it ending, and them all going home, many will have changed their minds about wanting to stay in the EU. And there's no way of knowing that unless they hold another People's March directly after the first.
    3
  58. Nope. The entire UK and everyone in it is my 'community'.
    3
  59. Its all perfectly simple: Corbyn, if he gets into power, will immediately renegotiate a Brexit deal with the EU. Even tho the EU has said there will be no renegotiation (will he be the only one in the room?). He will apparently then get a better deal even tho he has made it quite clear that on no account will he support a no deal Brexit. Then he will put the deal before the people in another referendum. Whereupon he and his party will campaign in favour of rejecting the deal he's just negotiated - I challenge you to come up with a more pointless, time wasting and self defeating policy than that.
    3
  60. There are two ways you can tell when Assad uses chemical weapons. 1) Russia vetoes UN investigations into such attacks. And 2) Galloway denies they ever happened.
    3
  61. The cladding was put on for insulation purposes.
    3
  62. You mean the business that enables them to mass produce their music, while employing many more people than just the artist? That kind of business? And what have you got against money lending? How do you think most people are able to set up their own business in the first place, or even buy a house, without them? What about private pensions? Foreign investment? Or are those words too big for you? Mouthing off about something you know nothing about, and haven't thought more than 5 seconds on, isn't an act of kindness. Its an act of irresponsibility simply to appeal to a crowd of kids who know no better.
    3
  63. That's because if your goal in life is to dismantle the very system that makes a wealthy free society possible, and replace it with an unworkable authoritarian system of state control that brings poverty and misery to millions, and always has, then people are entitled to call into question whether you really do 'care'.
    3
  64. Um, no. Corbyn is not jewish.
    3
  65. Short termism - That pretty much sums Corbynism up. And outside of western-style capitalist liberal democracies, the world isn't becoming a fairer place. There is a war being waged against genuine oppression just across the Med in Syria. Not first world 'someone-has-more-than-me' oppression. But real oppression, enforced by the use of chemical weapons. And Corbyn has nothing to say because he couldn't be less interested. His heroes are dictators like Castro, Chavez, and the Iranian Islamic revolution. Because they call themselves 'anti-imperialist', while they oppress millions.
    3
  66. Corbyn offers the avoidance of responsibility. He's a populist. Unable and unwilling to even recognise the complexities of the system he and his lucky supporters benefit from. And like all populists, if the answers don't fit on a protest banner, he's not interested. It's style over substance. He's like a child. Which is why he appeals to children.
    3
  67. Yes. And that's wrong too. But how is that an excuse to support a leader of the labour party who actively supported terrorism against the UK. Which is worse? Having a councillor who supported terrorism against the UK, or having a prime minister who supported the IRA? It's as stupid an argument as saying that just because one party has a member somewhere who committed murder, we should all be fine with voting for a prime minster who committed murder. Do you see?
    3
  68. Anthony Baiocchi Its always hilarious to hear Corbyn supporters comparing Corbyn to Mandela. How many times has Corbyn been arrested in Iran for demonstrating against the regime there?
    3
  69. Anthony Baiocchi So why bring up Mandela in his defence? Sounds like you were engaging in some historical revisionism, in the hopes you could paint Corbyn as a great man of peace. Well, ok. So like C.D Warnes said, how many 'loyalist' Irish terrorist members has Corbyn invited to parliament? How many times has Corbyn honoured dead UFF members? How many times did he protest against bringing them to justice for their crimes? How many of their leaders has he sat sniggering with? To negotiate peace, as you claim, he'd have to be trusted by both sides, yes? You can't present yourself as a neutral attempting to negotiate peace, if you only ever honour and support one side, can you? How many awards did Corbyn's shadow chancellor, John McDonnell, receive from the UDA? And why did Corbyn lie when he said he hadn't met the IRA? Surely, he'd have to, if he was 'negotiating peace' with them?
    3
  70. If you support discrimination against people because of their gender, you can't then argue that it is discriminatory to discriminate against people because of their gender.
    3
  71. And as we all know, Infowars fans tend to sound off about Islamist terrorism, just before going off on gun rampages of their own.
    3
  72. I call it as I see it. Galloway knows anti-Semitism plays well with his supporters.
    3
  73. Having spent the best part two years telling everyone that, despite being in the majority, those who voted leave in the referendum didn't actually want to leave, its a bit presumptuous for Femi to now claim that those who voted for the Greens, the Limp Dems, and every other party that is not the Brexit party, all voted the way they did because they wanted to remain. What evidence is there for that? - Plus, of course, even if you accept his argument, leave still polled higher as the Conservatives are a leave party. They were only left out of Femi's calculations because, like so many others on the remain campaign, the tactic is to simply ignore votes that go against them.
    3
  74. This guy is clearly a lunatic. A very sinister lunatic.
    3
  75. Tune in next week to hear how Chuka is absolutely delighted to join the Greens
    3
  76. Compare Galloway's views on Hamas supporters storming the Israeli border, with his support of Assad's use of chemical weapons against the people of Syria.
    3
  77. Wasn't it Russian amateurs that shot down MH17? I think so, yes.
    3
  78. They are no longer UK citizens. So, much like anyone else given the death penalty in the US or anywhere else, they are no longer the UK's responsibility.
    3
  79. Bollocks. Jackson made himself absurdly wealthy. Built a child trap. Then payed off his victims. How naive have you gotta be to the believe the whole 'he felt that only children really understood him' bs? He was a grown man. Able to manage his own career. And just how difficult is it not to regularly sleep with star struck young boys?
    3
  80. How many times has Putin eliminated the jihadists in Syria then?
    3
  81. This arrogant little shit and people like him will never win over those who voted for Brexit, because he's not even willing to acknowledge the reason why they voted the way they did. Instead he, and others like him, have decided that its because of a list of things that just so happens to match up to the Labour party electioneering message: poverty, inequality, austerity, etc - Nope. People voted to leave the EU because they dont want political union with the rest of Europe. But do please carry on wasting your time having a completely different discussion!
    3
  82. 00Billy You do realise that Skripal was part of a spy exchange? Russia needed to keep him alive in exchange for Anna Chapman. A Russian spy.
    3
  83. Does anyone care what the drunken slob Alexander Nekrassov has to say about anything?
    3
  84. Better not take your kids to any festive pantomimes then
    3
  85. Russia's Muslim population as a percentage is roughly 3 times higher than the UK's. So Russian woman will be in harems and Russian men eunuchs long before any of that happens in the UK. Lol.
    3
  86. This guy's a lunatic
    2
  87. Actually Saddam was far closer to Russia. They armed him to the teeth after all.
    2
  88.  @swanpride  Both main parties promised to respect the result. Were they just lying to get elected? As for the 1975 ref, the result was carried through. So if you see the recent referendum as being a second referendum on EU membership (ignoring for the moment that the EEC back then was very different from the EU of today), then in order to have your third referendum, Brexit must be fully implemented as was promised, and you should wait another 40 years before voting a third time.
    2
  89. She sounds nutz
    2
  90. Anthony Baiocchi So you think the answer is a socialist system that doesnt work, has never worked, and has brought poverty, misery, and war to millions is better? You are unable to engage any further than meaningless slogans. You're like a child. Which is why you fall for Corbyn's simplistic childish view of the world.
    2
  91. 'povety misery and perpetual war is a result of your beliefs: capitalism and empire' No it isn't. Take World War Two, for example: Soviet Russia armed and supplied Nazi Germany right up to the very moment the first German soldier stepped foot on soviet occupied East Poland. While the west was attempting to enforce the Versailles Treaty, the soviets were busy helping to train Germany's future tank divisions. The soviets believed, just as had happened in Russia itself, that communism would be spread with the aid of another world war. Afghanistan: Again, the soviet invasion so destabilised and wrecked the country, that Afghanistan is still yet to recover. Korea: Started by the communist North (and backed by the soviet Russians and communist Chinese) the Korean war cost nearly 3 million casualties. Vietnam: Who were the Americans fighting against? The VC. The Vietnamese Communists. After a war costing 1.4 million casualties, the US was finally out, and the communists set about imprisoning over 300,000 Vietnamese into soviet gulags. Those are just 4 examples. And they prove that war and imperialism has nothing to do with capitalism. In fact, Marxism is an expansionist, imperialist ideology. Most often spread by the use of creating instability and violence. And once those who advocate it gain power, the authoritarianism they enact is very often far worse than anything that went before - Soviet Russia, North Korea, Ukraine, Vietnam, Poland, Crimea, Communist China, Cambodia, Ethiopia, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Latin America. All in the space of a couple hundred years. While I live in the capitalist west. And enjoy better health, wealth, more freedoms, privileges, and rights, than at any time in human history. So go scuttle off back under your rock.
    2
  92. Lets be realistic here, Ken wouldn't have backed the war against nazi Germany either. Neither would Corbyn. And Galloway would've supported Hitler all the way.
    2
  93. John You'd have to be incredibly gullible to believe the denials of the KGB regime in the kremlin. And is Putin talking war against the west again? Because no one in the UK has.
    2
  94. nickxcore74 Why is that hypocrisy? Galloway himself often likes to talk of how Londoners used to beat up the brownshirts. Looking at the dent in Galloway's head, it seems that proud tradition is alive and well today.
    2
  95. Galloway is vermin
    2
  96. Yeah, you can see how serious the guy is by the fact he is wearing a fake beard.
    2
  97. sirgay meerkat There is a difference between negotiating with an enemy. And supporting the enemy. The tories, and (sane) labour, negotiated with the IRA. Corbyn supported it. And nobody needs to do anything to Venezuela. It's socialist dictatorship is quite capable of ruining the country without outside help. All socialist regimes are.
    2
  98. Corbyn clearly sided with the IRA. He demonstrated against bringing IRA terrorists to justice. And voted against the Anglo-Irish agreement that made peace in northern Ireland possible, because he felt it would harm the IRA's cause (his shadow chancellor, John McDonnell, was even given an award by a convicted IRA murderer in recognition of his support). Corbyn had no part in any peace negotiations. He supported the IRA just as he now supports Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Iranian regime.
    2
  99. Lol. That's the real hardcore Corbyn supporter, right there. The idea that he is, or ever was, a pacifist is just lies. They know the real truth.
    2
  100. Galloway is filth.
    2
  101. Stanky old trot
    2
  102. flower power It's very simple. All-woman shortlists discriminate by gender. If you support all-women short lists, then you support gender discrimination. So logically you cannot then complain that not being allowed on an all-woman short-list because you're not a woman is wrong. Furthermore, once you decide that its ok to discriminate against someone, not on their individual abilities, but on their gender, then it really doesn't matter what the individual feels, or how he see's himself. That is irrelevant. Because your only criteria on who is or is not acceptable is based on gender.
    2
  103. The top leadership roles in the UK today are all held by females. So there clearly is no gender discrimination. Certain jobs appeal to men. Certain jobs appeal to woman. Politics generally appeals less to women than it does to men. The same can be said about other jobs. For example, not many women join the army, and teaching and nursing is an all female industry in some cases.
    2
  104. George 'Quisling' Galloway makes huge sums of cash working for the kremlin's propaganda channel RT. Just as he does working for the ayatollah's PressTV channel.
    2
  105. Oh, dear. Batten has now said Ukip is basically the far right. Watch as his party disappears up it own ass.
    2
  106. No it isn't. Because people who work to rehabilitate criminals don't usually support the aims of those criminals. They also don't usually campaign to prevent those criminals from facing justice for their crimes. Both of which Jeremy Corbyn has indeed done.
    2
  107. Galloway should just get a job at Infowars.
    2
  108. All parties will have their cranks, extremists, and racists. But in the case of the labour party, the cranks, extremists, and racists are the leadership. Thats why they are attracting more than their fair share of cranks, extremists, and racists.
    2
  109.  Ian Brown  What makes you think he speaks for the oppressed? He says nothing about the Iranian regime. Won't speak out against the regime in Venezuela. Nothing to say about minorities in Pakistan. Silent on China. And couldn't care less about Syria. The only reason why he focuses on Palestine is because the world's only Jewish state is involved.
    2
  110. A rabid anti-Semite and a grovelling apologise for the very worst of regimes.
    2
  111. Lol. This isn't a court of law. Galloway is always very careful what he says. But plausible deniability only works with those willing to play along.
    2
  112. Aidan Kelly Ever since Galloway was kicked from the Labour party, he has been increasingly desperate for support. And like many on the extreme left, he has found that support playing to the prejudice of the Muslim community. Galloway supports the Assad regime in Syria. He also supports the Iranian regime, as well as working for their Press TV propaganda channel (that same channel that got removed from UK airwaves for working alongside the Iranian security forces in torturing televised confessions from Iranian dissidents). Both regimes have far worse human rights than Israel. In fact, while Galloway has nothing good to say about that region's only democratic state, he is always very quick to defend the bloodthirsty regime in Damascus. Even going so far as to parrot Assad's propaganda to cover the regime's use of chemical weapons. Blaming it instead on Israel. Obviously ...Because the Jews have to be behind everything. ''...Here's my theory! ...Israel gave them [al Qaeda] the chemical weapons! So that they would use them. So that they would bring the international community into the final destruction of Syria!'' Assad couldn't have put it better himself. But what Galloway fails to mention in his 'theory' is that Russia, Assad's ally, has vetoed UN investigations into the use of chemical weapons numerous times. And you can bet it didn't do that to help cover for Israel. Galloway knows this. He couldn't not know this. But it pays to play old prejudices (literally, in Galloway's case - as in 2014 he made over £100,000 that year working for Press TV). So either the man is a massive hypocrite. Or he just doesn't like the Jews. Or both. Either way, he plays to the anti-Semitic crowd. And he knows it.
    2
  113. Galloway blames the Jews for chemical weapons attacks against Assad's enemies: https://youtu.be/RSfRBSSxW1Y
    2
  114. He blames Israel because it's the world's only Jewish state. He doesn't blame Assad, because Press TV is an Iranian propaganda channel. And Iran supports Assad. He knows pointing the finger at the world's only Jewish state is the reason why the Iranians employ him. It plays well to their audience. Especially when it's a westerner who was once an MP. Here is a Finkelstein quote from wiki on the Charlie Hebdo murders... "...So, two despairing and desperate young men act out their despair and desperation against this political pornography no different than Der Stürmer [a Nazi newspaper], who in the midst of all of this death and destruction decide its somehow noble to degrade, demean, humiliate and insult the people. I'm sorry, maybe it is very politically incorrect. I have no sympathy for [the staff of Charlie Hebdo]. Should they have been killed? Of course not. But of course, Streicher [who ran Der Stürmer] shouldn't have been hung. I don't hear that from many people'' Finkelstein is one of those whiny types that are habitually full of self loathing. A useful idiot. But he's not anti-Semitic.
    2
  115. When Galloway declared he wanted to make Bradford an 'Israeli-free zone' what do you think he was referring to? The Israeli state? Was the Israeli state operating out of Bradford? And who do you think he was hoping to gain support from by saying that? And if a politician had said 'Let's make Bradford a Pakistani free zone', what does that imply? And who might be attracted by it? I have no particular interest in Israel, but absolutely I try Galloway by the company he keeps. The type of people that both Corbyn and Galloway regularly mix with make the BNP look like choirboys. And if the tory leadership hung out with Le Pen (who despite her repulsiveness, is considerably less bad than the filth Corbyn and Galloway support), I'd have no problem trying them for the company they keep. Like I said, Galloway is very careful about what he says and how he says it. And Corbyn spent much of his career on the back benches sitting right next to Galloway. You recognise what Galloway is, even if you don't agree that he's anti-Semitic. So, why didn't Corbyn?
    2
  116. That's where I disagree. Galloway sold out his principles a long time ago. That's if he ever had any to begin with. Which I doubt. Mad or bad or both. Either way, Galloway takes the money and says what's expected.
    2
  117. Corbyn has a number of agendas. A united Ireland is one. Which, for example, was why he voted against the Anglo-Irish agreement. Because, ''...We believe that the agreement strengthens rather than weakens the border between the six and the 26 counties, and those of us who wish to see a United Ireland oppose the agreement for that reason.” So he had an agenda there. And was prepared to hold up the peace process because of it - Not something someone who is supposedly only interested in peace would do.
    2
  118. Last caller makes a very good point. Pretty sure we could easily find someone from the camp she is currently in more deserving then her. Let her stay there. And bring someone else to the UK in her place.
    2
  119. MrB1923 The MH17 investigation ran out of steam? What planet are you on? The JIT investigation clearly named Russia as guilty. Even identifying the unit responsible. And the Ukrainian government was democratically voted into power. No coup. And is, of course, far more legitimate than the KGB mafia regime in Moscow.
    2
  120. Phish Phood That's a fake laugh!
    2
  121. The five nation Joint Investigation Team, made up of Belgium, Ukraine, Australia, Malaysia, and the Netherlands, did a full investigation. On 24 May 2018 they found that the Buk that shot down flight MH17 came from the Russian 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade from Kursk ...I think the kremlin is still claiming the flight was shot down by a Ukrainian jet? Altho seem to claim something one month, then something totally different the next. Or maybe they think aliens did it? Idk.
    2
  122. Then the headlines were correct. Because the UK government said it was novichok, and, as the OPCW has said in its SUMMARY OF THE REPORT ON ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT IN SUPPORT OF A REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE BY  THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, 'The results of analysis by the OPCW designated laboratories of environmental and biomedical samples collected by the OPCW team confirm the findings of the United Kingdom relating to the identity of the toxic chemical that was used in Salisbury and severely injured three people'
    2
  123. https://www.opcw.org/fileadmin/OPCW/S_series/2018/en/s-1612-2018_e_.pdf
    2
  124. So, seeing as the OPCW has confirmed it was novichok, I'll ask again. What exactly is fake about this? What did the Guardian and other newspapers report that was wrong?
    2
  125. MDH Have a lot of experience with chemical nerve agents, do you?
    2
  126. Not claims. The UN and OPCW themselves have verified Assad's use of chemical weapons.
    2
  127. Putin's blundering has isolated Russia once again.
    2
  128. How is it surprising that Ken Livingstone is a useful idiot?
    2
  129. Notice how Galloway supporters invariably sound like a cross between the nazi party and ISIS.
    2
  130. Drag queens perform for kids about this time every year in pantomime
    2
  131. Lol. Whats the difference?
    2
  132. Perhaps Boris Johnson is secretly working for Israel? Lol
    2
  133. Lol. I'm no Zionist. I don't even know any jews! I just like how the extreme left crosses over with the extreme right. And enjoy seeing them pretend there's a difference between themselves.
    2
  134. Is Galloway a jihadist tho? He's very tight with the ayatollah! Lol.
    2
  135. Russia is also very tight with the ayatollah! Perhaps that's to do with its large muslim majority as opposed to the west? They better start learning their Qur'an!
    2
  136. What is it with commies and Islamists, I wonder?
    2
  137. Indeed. In 2014 he earned more than £300,000 outside of parliament. Mostly from his regular £1,600-an-hour appearances on Iran's Press TV and Russia Today. He knows his audience well. And will literally work for anyone.
    2
  138. No, he's just an idiot. But then so is Jeremy Corbyn. The difference is, Corbyn is our idiot.
    2
  139. George makes his money working for Putin's propaganda channel, RT. He also makes his cash working for Iran's 'PressTV'. No low is too low for Galloway!
    2
  140. Communism has a terrible environmental record. Take a look at China, for example.
    2
  141. Oh, no you didn't. You just think you did. But this little halfwit and his army of 'academics' know better.
    2
  142. If a 'no deal' Brexit is not possible, as the Green party lady claims, then that really only leaves May's Brexit deal. But the Green party voted against May's deal. They also voted against 'no deal'. So its pretty clear that the Green party will accept nothing but remain, and vote accordingly. So why call for another referendum, if they have no intention of honouring the result? Why even participate in the democratic process if you reject the principle?
    2
  143. @BladeRunner You seem to know an awful lot about the subject
    2
  144. Working on RT? PressTV?
    1
  145. Corbyn is looking terribly weak. Remember, this is the same guy who refused to support action against ISIS.
    1
  146. Lol. Would that be by the Putin regimes propaganda channel RT by any chance?
    1
  147. Galloway is best taken in very small doses. To reduce the likelihood of vomiting.
    1
  148. linda green I'm gonna take a wild guess at assuming your ideal man is an ex-KGB secret police colonel with an inferiority complex.
    1
  149. Compared to McDonnell and his mate Corbyn, Abbot is the sane one
    1
  150. Peter Hitchen's is upset because he keeps watching news about Russia's threats to invade Ukraine. Well, stop watching it if you're not interested.
    1
  151. Leemsy lazy Sure, I bet you're gutted that Saddam, the Taliban, and Gadhafi are no more
    1
  152. Lol
    1
  153. Dictators Sadiq Khan's party leader has met with in the past include Xi Jinping (communist dictator of China), president Assad (mass murdering tyrant of Syria), Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, the foreign minister of Iran, and Miguel Díaz-Canel (dictator of Cuba).
    1
  154. The time to have voted out those who opposed the results of the referendum was during the last referendum. Troubles is, many MPs lied when they promised they would respect the ref result. So now parliament doesnt represent what the people voted for.
    1
  155. Because the UK spent all that time trying to negotiate a half-in, half-out deal. Rather than preparing to leave.
    1
  156. It's not deliberate. It's because too many people want to live in London.
    1
  157. Let's start with Galloway
    1
  158. Yes. If it doesnt happen it will be because of all the negative vibes in the studio
    1
  159. Don't be trying to hold a debate with me. I have absolutely no interest in anything you have to say.
    1
  160. Thats because he's trying to stir the pot a bit.
    1
  161. Justine Greening makes no sense on this at all.
    1
  162.  @bannedvideos3399  She didnt even seem aware that the police had removed Assange at the request of the Ecuadorian government.
    1
  163. Anthony Baiocchi Are you going to claim the earth is flat next?
    1
  164. Corbyn has devoted much of his life to supporting sectarian terrorism. Now that his past catches up with him, his followers do a Trump and cry fake news.
    1
  165. Corbyn didn't pursue peace all his life. He supported terrorists. While they were committing terrorist acts against the UK. Thats not pursuing peace.
    1
  166. shamanahaboolist Supporting terrorists isn't making peace. It's supporting terrorism.
    1
  167. Yes he did. He even demonstrated against bringing IRA murderers to justice. What a nice man!
    1
  168. shamanahaboolist You don't have to believe me. You can just google 'corbyn arrested IRA trial' and you can read, from multiple sources, how Jeremy Corbyn was arrested for obstruction during his demonstration against the trials of IRA terrorists.
    1
  169. How many times has Corbyn demonstrated against bringing loyalist terrorists to justice?
    1
  170. Hahaha!
    1
  171. Israel is one of the few places in the middle east where people do have freedom of speech. So clearly you're talking bollocks. Lol.
    1
  172. Yes, I can. North Korea is a good example. Iran would be another example. Or you could take a look at Syria.
    1
  173. What is 'freedom of responsible speech'? - Just another way of saying 'you can't criticise your rulers'? I can. They can in Israel too.
    1
  174. Matt Zucchini The OPCW isn't on the ground yet. They still haven't been able to reach the site. I wonder why? And what do you think they will find? Sarin? Both the kremlin and the Assad regime better hope not. Because they have claimed they had information that it was all a hoax. The Russian ambassador himself reported to the UN that Russian specialists found no evidence of a chemical attack. So remember, if the OPCW finds traces of sarin, or chlorine gas, then either the Russian's are lying at the UN. Or their specialists are incompetent.
    1
  175. louise Corbett Not this time. Not according to the Russian ambassador to the UN and his experts. Remember, he has claimed they found nothing.
    1
  176. Matt Zucchini Nothing stopping Assad from inviting the OPCW to investigate the site. He alone can give them access. So why hasn't he?
    1
  177. Matt Zucchini What site do you want them to investigate? They are supposedly investigating Douma. Although they have no mandate to investigate who was responsible. And as I said, if Assad and Putin's claims are true, they could invite the OPCW to inspect Assad's recently bombed chemical weapons facility. Why don't they?
    1
  178. Matt Zucchini The Russian ambassador to the UN claimed Russian specialists had already investigated the Douma site, and found nothing. So clearly the Russian's are not having problems securing the area for their own investigation. Only when it comes to the OPCW's investigation. And once again, Assad could invite the OPCW to investigate the sites targeted by the US, UK, and France, any time he liked. It doesn't need a UN mandate for that.
    1
  179. Matt Zucchini The OPCW mission came under fire as they carried out a preliminary inspection. They were shot at and explosives were detonated. So I have no idea what Emily Thornberry was talking about. Most likely, neither does she. Clearly the UN is not prepared to act to stop the use of chemical weapons. Not while Russia (a country that has itself used chemical weapons in the UK recently) consistently vetoes action. So if the UN won't act, I'm perfectly happy to know someone else will.
    1
  180. Assad isn't winning the war. He barely controls half the country. He's just recently captured Douma, a suburb of Damascus. His own capital. Nearly seven years of war, and all that France, the US, and the UK can do is take out a handful of targets that Assad claims were medical facilities, injuring or killing 3 people? Hardly evidence of a grand conspiracy. Doesn't make sense. Unless you realise that the west knew where Assad was manufacturing his chemical weapons. Then it makes perfect sense.
    1
  181. You're just ignoring what's right in front of you.
    1
  182. Get that from 'south front', did you? Or was it one one of the other Russian fake sites?
    1
  183. Yes. Strange how Russian specialists and journalists can carry out their investigations in Douma unhindered, but whenever the OPCW turn up, someone starts shooting at them ...Or not really strange. Because we all knew that was how it would play out. Here is that same Russian 'journalist' receiving the 'Order of Merit for the Fatherland' from Vladimir Putin back in January 2017 https://youtu.be/b7-h2M5JLwM ...When you're being given something called the Order of Merit for the Fatherland' you should know your on the wrong side of history.
    1
  184. Neil Sumner The Assad regime has a very brutal history. It's a dictatorship. You think they can't get a kid to say what they want him to say on tv? It's clear Russia is playing for time in an effort to hide the truth from the OPCW.
    1
  185. Neil Sumner Well, we do know that Assad is a dictator. Power was handed to him by his father, and the Assad family have been in power for some 40 years. And we know he's brutal. Because anyone who would rather see his country collapse into civil war rather than leave power would have to be just that. And we know he has used chemical weapons. As documented by the UN and OPCW ...Although Don't remember May or Cameron killing 120,000 Brits (if that's what you mean). Perhaps you should check your sources on that one? lol
    1
  186. Neil Sumner I guess some would argue austerity is directly the result of massive UK debt? And, really? Assad never wanted power? He's been in power for 18 years. I'm not aware that Peter Hitchens carried out his own research and investigation into Assad's chemical weapons. But I am aware that the kremlin has been working in advance to undermine the credibility of the OPCW.
    1
  187. Neil Sumner I'm not interested in watching Russian propaganda or loony right wing conspiracy channels. And Peter Hitchens' argument has already been repeated here. It's basically 'why would Assad use chemical weapons knowing what would happen?' Well, that's a circular argument. Because if he's been using them, which both the UN and OPCW believe, and nothing happens as a result (apart from a few missiles hitting the runway of one of his airbases), then there's your answer as to why he uses them. Because he can get away with it. Chemical weapons are by far his most potent weapon. Very useful when dealing with an enemy that is well dug in (the reason why all sides used it during the trench warfare of world war one). Like the forces in Douma. That have been holding out since the beginning of the war in Syria. The OPCW and UN both hold Assad responsible for the Khan Shaykhun chemical attack (regardless of what Hitchens may think). But apart from Trump's unilateral action, what did the UN do? Nothing.
    1
  188. Could he not have hired a PR firm to compose the job advert for him? Before finally putting it out to public consultation? There are multiple agencies that would have happily have worked with him on this.
    1
  189. Phish Phood Here, knock yourself out: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-24130181 Notice how the UN investigation into a chemical weapons attack in Ghouta in 2014 highlights that ''...importantly the two types of rocket used - a Russian-supplied 140mm system and especially the larger 330mm weapon of unknown origin - are significant since according to both Human Rights Watch and a number of independent arms experts - these are weapons that have only been observed in use by Syrian government forces during this conflict'' Assad has been using chemical weapons for years. And the Russian regime has be supporting him all the while.
    1
  190. Iain Lee thinks 'she sounds like an uneducated working class person - must be racist and homophobic!'
    1
  191. Putin is KGB. He acts like you would expect the KGB to act. With predictable results.
    1
  192. Yup. And as Galloway never tires of telling us, there are consequences for spreading hate. The evidence of that is the dent in his head. Have you seen Galloway's performance on Iran's Press TV propaganda channel? Where he tells his audience of his 'theory' that Israel supplies ISIS with chemical weapons to use on Syrian civilians? What do you think the consequences might be to spreading that kind of conspiracy? I endorse Galloway getting a good kicking. Bash a Nazi, and all that. Just as Galloway himself does when he gets all dewy eyed over the brownshirts getting a bashing in the east end.
    1
  193. https://youtu.be/RSfRBSSxW1Y
    1
  194. I acknowledge the facts of the Putin regime. Don't you?
    1
  195. Being a fan of Karl Marx it's not surprising Corbyn has a problem with the jews. Marx had a massive problem with jews.
    1
  196. Campbell is a very odd man
    1
  197. Hartley-Brewer called Butler out on her vast hypocrisy. Supporting terrorists and Islamist fascist regimes is fine, just don't text about boobs.
    1
  198. This man is an idiot. He tells lies. Then uses a tragedy as a shield. Low.
    1
  199. Very interesting
    1
  200. No, the real reason why there are few women in politics is because high power political careers do not appeal to woman as much as they do men. There are certain careers that appeal more to one gender than the other. We know this. It is the reason why there are very few women boxers, and very few male midwifes, for example. 'Affirmative action' (not very affirmative for those it discriminates against), or to give it its proper title, 'legal discrimination', actually teaches 'see, woman cannot compete with men'. It is lazy. It assumes ill intent without evidence (that there is a bias). Anti-democratic. And gives bad results (if the majority of candidates are removed simply for being male, then you will not be getting the best person for the job).
    1
  201. It's not 'gender programming' to recognise the fact that boys are different to girls. It's reality. We see it in the rest of the animal kingdom also. There are biological reasons for this. There are reasons why females are more empathetic and care orientated. And men more competitive. It's to do with reproduction. Which is the driving force of any biological life. Rather than recognise this age old fact, you arbitrarily decide that this is down to discrimination. Big surprise. But individuals are not groups. No matter what colour their skin is. Or what sex they are. Discrimination, whether or not you call it 'affirmative action', treats the individual as part of a group. Rather than as an individual who must be judged on their own merits. Because individuals are individuals and not groups, we now see in this video an individual that see's themselves, not as part of one particular group, but belonging to another, despite the obvious. So now who decides who is part of what group? What is it based on? Gender? Or the individual? It can't be both.
    1
  202. So why are there so few male nurses in the health service? Discrimination? Must be, right?
    1
  203. Oh, I see. You're a troll. I was wondering why someone would talk such shite.
    1
  204. Meurig Davies It's pretty obvious that the whole of Russia is now stuck in a time warp. Fantasising about the recreation of its soviet empire. But that is to be expected. As having Putin in power in Russia is essentially the same as having a gestapo officer as German chancellor. With pretty much the same results.
    1
  205. The KGB have been murdering Russians ever since they crept out from sewers.
    1
  206. Gerard Batten: "Tommy Robinson's message is similar to UKIP's"
    1
  207. Mark Lewis Why bring up Israel when talking about anti-Semitism? Do people bring up Pakistan's appalling human rights record (far worse then Israel's) when we talk anti-Muslim hate crime? ...You'd clearly be at home either in Corbyn's labour party, or some neo-Nazi getup.
    1
  208.  @andykendall5171  lol
    1
  209. Trouble is, Assad apologists have used that same excuse for years.
    1
  210. Jew hating is the one issue the lunatic far right can agree with the lunatic far left on. Coming together in hate.
    1
  211. It doesn't often happen, but James Whale is wrong on this.
    1
  212. How are you ever going to make the argument against misogynistic religious practices if you don't even give an opinion?
    1
  213. You sound like a Nazi
    1
  214.  @jasonh.3006  Lol. You're a nut.
    1
  215. A fan of the KGB regime in the kremlin are you reach for the stars?
    1
  216. A fan of a KGB secret policeman?
    1
  217. reach for the stars I can assure you I'm not a fan of the ex-KGB secret police colonel in the kremlin
    1
  218. Brexit party's protest was aimed at the extremely powerful institution of the European parliament. The Limp Dems protest was aimed at voters who voted against membership of the EU.
    1
  219. Where's the evidence that Michael Jackson had a 'child-like innocence'? The guy was vastly wealthy and one of the most famous people on earth. You don't that by being naive and innocent. He literally built himself a child magnet. Slept with young boys and payed off his victim's parents.
    1
  220. When Assad finally allows the OPCW in to investigate the suspected chemical attack in Douma, we'll see if there is any truth to Russia's claims of it being a hoax. If they find traces of sarin (highly likely), we'll know the Russian's are lying. It will also prove that Russia is covering up Assad's use of chemical weapons. As they will have known Assad was about to carry out the attack.
    1
  221. Stuart Crossland, I know you're a big fan of communism and the Iranian Islamic revolution and everything, but even you can't be stupid enough to buy into yet more kremlin ww3 hype?
    1
  222. Its a cult mentality
    1
  223. Papillon659 You seem to be arguing against your own logic. First you say there isn't an agency in the world that wouldn't try to neutralise a rogue operative. Then ask why would anyone kill a rogue operative? You also seem to be under the impression that western intelligence agencies operate much like the Russians. Which is untrue. As anyone with any knowledge of how intelligence agencies in the west work would know.
    1
  224. Annie Machon shacked up with David Shayler. The guy who eventually declared himself the second coming. Machon left MI5 in 1997. Alexander Litvinenko was assassinated in 2006.
    1
  225. 'Operation Gladio is the codename for a clandestine North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) "stay-behind" operation in Italy during the Cold War. Its purpose was to continue armed resistance in the event of a Warsaw Pact invasion and conquest.' Are you one of those chinless soy boy communists? You do know Putin is KGB, right? You do know he assassinates his political opposition and murders journalist? No, even on their worst days, western intelligence agencies do not operate like the KGB. It's the reason why we're not a third world dictatorship like Russia.
    1
  226. Many, many more people waking up to the fact that the ex-KGB secret policeman in the kremlin has a habit of assassinating those who displease him. And that this has now become a threat to all of us.
    1
  227. Oh, so you believe him to have been the 'son of the godhead' do you? And you believe in shape-shifting lizards too?
    1
  228. ...It can only be explained by a paranoid know-nothing egotistical twat going thro a decades long mid life mental breakdown - While charging £40 a head.
    1
  229. Harvinder Rishiraj Well, David Icke is paranoid. And despite selling himself as nothing but a humble messenger of truth, you can't get more egotistical than declaring yourself to be the son of the godhead! He believes in shape-shifting lizards. And he charges roughly £40 for people to sit and listen to him vomiting out his ill-thought out views and fantasies. He's a charlatan. There has been, and are, many like him. And he makes his living by fleecing the gullible, ignorant, and stupid.
    1
  230. mick78ftm "...Try suspending all your beliefs and listen to him and think for yourself" You mean, ignore all that you have learnt, ditch your life's experiences, and listen to the man on stage? ...Bah!
    1
  231. Richard Fletcher There's nothing controversial about calling David Icke a paranoid narcissist. He fits the description perfectly. He mainly appeals to people who need a big bad 'Them' to explain away why they are losers in life. It makes them feel important to think that the government listens in on what they have to say. When in reality, no one really cares. And Icke says nothing of any worth on any subject. I've heard him talk, and his ignorance on even the basics is astounding. He doesnt research anything. He's all ego. Proof is for lesser mortals, not something the son of the Godhead should have to worry his fuzzy little head about. He's a clown. Who resents the fact that people laugh at his silly claims - As they should.
    1
  232. barry low Now you are going into the realms of general conspiracism. Only you do your argument no favours by linking it to a crank like David Icke.
    1
  233. Lol. Icke is a failed Joseph Smith.
    1
  234. Let me guess... the jews? I already mentioned Icke appeals to people who need a big bad 'Them' to explain away why they are losers in life. Thanx for proving my point.
    1
  235. Itsnotforourconvenience Despite his 'lectures' going on and on and on for hours, Icke actually has nothing of any substance to say. He's a paranoid narcissist. Or, as many who experience mental breakdowns do, he went through a very grandiose and narcissistic phase. Where he claimed to be the son of the godhead. Icke has a problem with low self esteem. When people reject his nonsensical fantasies (shape-shifting lizards) he reacts badly. But he still demands the limelight. Still see's himself as a new age prophet. This is important, because grand conspiracy theories appeal to paranoid personalities with exaggerated feelings of self-love. 'They are watching me, spying on me' - I am a very important person my words will bring about massive upheaval and change. Icke is also extremely pessimistic. Constantly obsessing about a supposed Orwellian present and future, and how people are controlled (i.e. don't believe his ramblings) and led like sheep unaware that they are slaves of 'the system' (false consciousness - once used by those on the far left to explain away why the masses didn't rise up and install a Marxist dictatorship). And we know low self-esteem predicts negative perceptions of humanity more broadly (if you have a low opinion of yourself, you're hardly likely to be upbeat about those around you or your situation). You might ask can you be a narcissist and have low self-esteem at the same time? The answer is yes. Many extremely narcissistic personalities have very thin skins. I'm sure you can think of at least one very high profile example of this.
    1
  236. harry haggle If you were at all interested in finding the truth, there is plenty of information out there to answer your questions. But you're not interested in the truth. Because it doesnt conform to your need for there to be an all powerful deep state/NWO controlling your life and watching over you. The opposite of that theory scares you. Because it means that people act with an agency of their own, things happen that cannot be predicted, and mistakes are made. If everything is not controlled by some hidden agency, then it means you have no one to blame for your own failures but yourself. It means you have certain responsibilities to society that you don't want. So it's much easier for you to abdicate self-responsibility and play the martyr. The helpless victim. Because helpless victims cannot be blamed. They are virtuous and untainted, and without responsibility.
    1
  237. Some pretty infantile comments from Anna Soubry there. Nigel Farage only returned to a leading role in the Brexit campaign because parliament has refused to carry out the results of the referendum. If it had been about his ego, he'd have never left.
    1
  238. Vietnam was a fight against the spread of communism. One of the most murderous ideologies in human history. Afghanistan was a war against the Taliban, who harboured al Qaeda. Western intervention in Libya stopped the country from collapsing into seven years of war, as we see in Syria today. And the war in Iraqi toppled a mass murdering tyrant, who, like the Assad regime, Galloway supports. And who, like the Assad regime, used chemical weapons.
    1
  239. Indeed. The napalm issue is one of the reasons why people should support the prohibition on chemical warfare. It is in everyone's interests. Although fractured and unstable, Libya is still in a far better position that Syria. And unless you claim the war in Libya would have ended on the very same day it did without western intervention, then it's obvious western intervention put an end to a Syrian-type war lasting years. The Red Cross predicted millions of Afghanis would flee Afghanistan in the event of western invasion. In the event, hundreds of thousands of Afghanis returned home to Afghanistan once the Taliban were removed from power. There are more than simply two sides fighting in Syria. It is not just ISIS vs Assad. If you don't believe me, then ask yourself who the Russians, Iranians, and Turkish think they are talking to when they say they want peace negations? ISIS? It could only be ISIS, if the war in Syria was just ISIS vs Assad, yes? Russia has vetoed yet another UN investigation into a suspected Assad chemical weapons attack in Syria. What is the point of the OPCW, if those who are signatories to it continually veto its investigations? We have already seen Russia is prepared to carry out weapons-grade chemical attacks in the UK (unless you believe it's all a big conspiracy against poor innocent Russia, in which case you should be more worried about the shape of the earth). So you can't use the excuse 'what has this got to do with us?'
    1
  240. Has Galloway condemned Assad's use of chemical weapons on Syrians?
    1
  241. Well, we know Assad has used chemical weapons against his people. Both the UN and the OPCW confirmed exactly that last year.
    1
  242. Astorrian Are you arguing against the UN and the OPCW? They clearly say Assad has used chemical weapons. Did you carry out an investigation perhaps? Have you published your results?
    1
  243. Astorrian I'm asking you what do you base your claims on? And you'll need to do better than simply parroting the Assad regimes propaganda.
    1
  244. Galloway is a keen supporter of the Assad regime.
    1
  245. People shouldn't. People also shouldn't send their kids to private schools. As such places are elitist institutions that reinforce privilege and inequality ...Unless, of course, you happen to be a Labour politician. In which case its ok. Because reasons.
    1
  246. You don't understand. No one is trying to prove anything to the KGB regime in Moscow. We know they did it. And they know we know they did it. It's not up for discussion.
    1
  247. Hi, George! This is 3 months later, and the OPCW has indeed found "various chlorinated chemicals" at the site of the attack in Douma!
    1
  248. Lol. Are you triggered that Assad's chemical weapons factory was targeted? Worried that he might run out of sarin?
    1
  249. Hahaha! An 'anti-venom factory'? So France, Britain, and the US went to all that effort to take out an 'anti-venom factory'? How dumb must you be to believe that? And Assad still only controls half of Syria. All he did was capture a suburb of Damascus. His capital. So yeah, it's absolutely worth his while to use chemical weapons. They are by far the most powerful weapon he has. And it pays off. Because even when the UN and the OPCW finds Assad guilty of using chemical weapons (as it did in Khan Shaykhun in 2017), nothing much happens at all. As for a new cold war, wake up. It's already happened. And Putin is always muttering sinister threats against the west (when he's not busy carrying out nerve agent attacks in the UK).
    1
  250. The LimpDems would be clucking about in mock outrage if the tories, or, heaven forbid, the Brexit party led their campaign under the slogan 'B******ks to Brussels'
    1
  251. What exactly is fake about this? What are they reporting that is fake? Do you know? Or are you just talkin out your ass?
    1
  252. John Kearns. I'd hardly call it scepticism. There's just plain denial from the kremlin, backed up by misinformation and outright lies. Both the UN and OPCW verified Assad's use of chemical weapons last year.
    1
  253. Trump
    1
  254. This guy is a creep.
    1
  255. Yes they do.
    1
  256. You're not even living in the same reality as the rest of us. You're nuts.
    1
  257. Lol. I think its possible to make a difference between the UK government and the KGB mafia state in Russia, soy boy.
    1
  258. KGB/FSB. Same mindset. Same results.
    1
  259. He didn't make anything. Idiot.
    1
  260. 19Lion8 Are you a time travel from 1930s Germany?
    1
  261. The type of filth Galloway supports make Tommy Robinson and his supporters look like choirboys.
    1
  262. Such as working for the Iranian regime's PressTV propaganda channel. The same channel that works alongside the Iranian regime in torturing televised confessions out of Iranian dissidents. Or Uday Hussein. Saddam's eldest son. The man who tortured, murdered, and raped for his own pleasure. The guy who in 1999 Galloway told "...I'd like you to know that we are with you 'til the end" Does 'Tommy Robinson' have such slavish adoration to actual real life murderers as Galloway? Who among those Robinson supports can compare to the type of filth Galloway idolises and lends his support to? (While getting well paid, obviously)
    1
  263.  @shamanahaboolist  Those aren't 'smears', as anyone with any knowledge of Corbyn knows.
    1
  264.  @shamanahaboolist  Hanging out with the IRA, Islamists extremists, Hamas, Hezbollah. It's all well documented.
    1
  265.  @shamanahaboolist  He didn't and doesnt oppose those groups. He supports their aims. He never sits down with those he opposes.
    1
  266.  @shamanahaboolist  UK parliament - He's an MP in the UK parliament. England doesnt have a parliament. Clear evidence there that you don't even understand the basics of what you're talking about.
    1
  267.  @shamanahaboolist  No, he has never done that. He has never been involved in any peace negotiations.
    1
  268.  @shamanahaboolist  No he wasn't. Corbyn played no part in the peace process. He actually voted against the Anglo-Irish Agreement which made the Good Friday Agreement possible.
    1
  269. That would make Galloway a fake jihadist.
    1
  270. Jew hating is real big in Russia. It's hilarious to see them raging about western Nazis, while cursing out the Jewish 'NWO'! XD
    1
  271. If Brexit is undeliverable, why did Anna Soubry not campaign on that platform during the referendum? Why was she not honest enough to say that in her opinion it is impossible for the UK to leave the EU?
    1
  272. damian kilbane Yes, but you are just repeating kremlin propaganda. You do realise its lies, right? It's how the KGB guy in the kremlin is selling a war to prop up his puppet, Assad - After all, the west have been targeting ISIS forces in Syria for years. Mainly while Assad and Russia focused on the anti-Assad forces, the very same forces that were fighting against ISIS.
    1
  273. damian kilbane I've just told you that the west have been targeting ISIS in Syria for years. In fact, it was the anti-Assad forces that did most of the fighting against ISIS for much of the time. While Assad concentrated on anti-Assad forces. The idea was to knock them out of the war, then claim to be the only ones fighting ISIS. The whole war could have been avoided had Russia not supported its puppet, Assad. As he would have had to have stepped down. Instead, while the west takes out dictators like Saddam, Gaddafi, and the Taliban, Russia, as usual, supports the dictators. Don't forget, Russia did the same with Nazi Germany. Allying with Hitler. Now its bogged down in Syria while its pensioners go hungry.
    1
  274. Taking out the taliban was a good idea. Same with Gaddafi. That guy armed the IRA to the teeth. Saddam wasn't our call to make. But if you can't make the argument in favour of war to remove Saddam, you sure as hell can't make the argument for war in support of Assad!
    1
  275. English Heart If you want to blame anyone for the state of Libya today, blame Gaddafi. After 40 years Libyans finally got off their knees and kicked him out. He had a choice then, either to go and save Libya, or stay and fight his own people. He chose to go to war. Western intervention shortened that war. Unless you care to make the claim that the conflict would have ended on the exact day it did, without western intervention? So compare Libya to Syria. The war is still going on in Syria. Casualties are anything from half a million to over a million. Millions more have fled the country. Six years after it began, its still going on. And at the end of it, its very likely the cause of the war, Assad, will remain in control of what's left of the country. Wouldn't it have been better if he had just gone? Sure, I guess you could blame the Libyan people and the Syrian people for fighting to defend themselves against the dictators that rule over them. But then you'd be an idiot. Especially if, at the same time, you bitch and whine about how terrible life is in the UK, where you have all the rights, privileges, and freedoms that you do. If you were Libyan, and you had posted '...Until we boot these lunatics out of power' as you did above, about the Gaddafi regime, you wouldn't just be another whiny first worlder desperate to play at being the victim. You would be taking your life in your hands, and putting your family and friends in danger. Especially if you lived in Benghazi. The same applies if you had been Syrian. Your posts would be monitored, not by an imaginary deep state, but by the security forces of an all too real regime that had kept itself in power for over 40 years, and is quite prepared to see the country burn to keep itself in power for another 40 years more. In other words, if you can't see the reasons why Libyans and Syrians would rise up against the brutal dictatorships that rule over them, then shut the fk up about how terrible your sad little life is under the present UK government.
    1
  276. English Heart I see you're sold on the whole 'dictatorships with a long history of supporting terrorism are our only hope of defeating terrorism' thing - You must have the memory of a goldfish.
    1
  277. damian kilblane Stick to watching Alex Jones on infowars. You're not good with reality.
    1
  278. Russia has shown it's prepared to not only aid in the us of chemical attacks in Syria, but to also carry them out in the UK. That makes it our business.
    1
  279. Galloway has made a career out of talking bullcrap. Why would he stop now?
    1
  280. The Russians don't even investigate their own political assassinations properly. If they did, Putin would be in jail. Don't forget, Russia is still very much a third world country. It doesn't have the rule of law. And corruption is off the scale. As Russia becomes more isolated from the west, all it fall further behind. With the inevitable result that, once again, Russia will collapse into chaos. This time, however, no one will care.
    1
  281. Yup. Galloway will work for anyone. No matter how bad. The Iranians or the Russians. Just so long as he gets paid.
    1
  282. He was more useful to Putin alive. Which was proved by the spy swap. His death sends a message. Just like the death of Litvinenko, and basically all Putin's opponents. Don't forget, the KGB secret police have been murdering Russians ever since they were created. Putin continues that tradition.
    1
  283. Why would the UK let Russia investigate a murder on UK territory? You think the Russian legal system is in anyway comparable to the UK's? Are you mad?
    1
  284. Yup. Galloway has always been a willing supporter of the very worst regimes in the world. It's how he makes his money.
    1
  285. linda green Thankfully, I don't live in a third-world shithole of a dictatorship like Russia. So the chances of me being locked up for telling the truth are zero.
    1
  286. Well, piss off to Russia then. You can listen to as many drunk Russians as you like.
    1
  287. You can piss off to Russia too
    1
  288. When the entire UK media feared to publish a few cartoons about Mohammed, was that 'Islamophobic'? Or did they have a genuine concern for what might happen as a result? When a pastor in the US threatened to publicly burn a copy of the Qur'an, and western leaders, the media, and media commentators pleaded for him not to go ahead and do it, was that an overreaction? Were their fears of the repercussions of such a simple act irrational? Or did they genuinely believe that free speech could not be applied to Islam due to the likelihood of a violent overreaction? Because it seems to me that you can't both say that we must abide by Islamic blasphemy law, or else, and claim that there is no problem with Islam.
    1
  289. And let us hope he never does get into power. Or Trump will be the very least of our worries.
    1
  290. Please don't link me anything from RT. Why would you be doing that? Why would you be getting your news direct from the kremlin? Are you an idiot?
    1
  291. In 2014, George Galloway earned over £300,000 outside parliament. Making him the third highest top earner in the top ten MPs. He made that money working for Iranian state-owned Press TV (taken off air in the UK due to its close work with the Iranian regime in torturing confessions out of Iranian dissidents) - £100,650, Beirut-based Al-Mayadeen TV (pro-Bashar al-Assad, Hezbollah) - £96,000, and Russia Today TV - £62,400.
    1
  292. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/revealed-the-british-mps-who-earned-more-than-7m-outside-of-parliament-in-2014-10066802.html
    1
  293. Rovert Seivad We know how Galloway makes his money and how much. Because he has to declare it. So no, its not unfounded assertion. It's fact.
    1
  294. This isn't casting aspersions. It's stating facts. And relevant facts, considering where Galloway's loyalties lie.
    1
  295. The fact that Galloway gets paid vast sums by the Iranian regime is not irrelevant.
    1
  296. A fascist state would be a state run by a KGB secret police colonel who regularly assassinates his opposition. Or a 40 year old dictatorship that uses chemical weapons against its own people.
    1
  297. SoulRippster So where are the media when it comes to regular reporting of human rights abuses in Iran? Or Pakistan? Or Syria? Perhaps if the world had focuses a little more on the Assad regime's abuses, it might not have come as such a shock when the country erupted into civil war?
    1