Comments by "Awesome Avenger" (@awesomeavenger2810) on "George Galloway: "Jeremy Corbyn is under siege"" video.

  1. ...says Galloway, the rabid anti-Semite.
    7
  2. Corbyn spent most of his political 'career' sitting on the back benches next to Galloway.
    5
  3. I call it as I see it. Galloway knows anti-Semitism plays well with his supporters.
    3
  4. A rabid anti-Semite and a grovelling apologise for the very worst of regimes.
    2
  5. Lol. This isn't a court of law. Galloway is always very careful what he says. But plausible deniability only works with those willing to play along.
    2
  6. Aidan Kelly Ever since Galloway was kicked from the Labour party, he has been increasingly desperate for support. And like many on the extreme left, he has found that support playing to the prejudice of the Muslim community. Galloway supports the Assad regime in Syria. He also supports the Iranian regime, as well as working for their Press TV propaganda channel (that same channel that got removed from UK airwaves for working alongside the Iranian security forces in torturing televised confessions from Iranian dissidents). Both regimes have far worse human rights than Israel. In fact, while Galloway has nothing good to say about that region's only democratic state, he is always very quick to defend the bloodthirsty regime in Damascus. Even going so far as to parrot Assad's propaganda to cover the regime's use of chemical weapons. Blaming it instead on Israel. Obviously ...Because the Jews have to be behind everything. ''...Here's my theory! ...Israel gave them [al Qaeda] the chemical weapons! So that they would use them. So that they would bring the international community into the final destruction of Syria!'' Assad couldn't have put it better himself. But what Galloway fails to mention in his 'theory' is that Russia, Assad's ally, has vetoed UN investigations into the use of chemical weapons numerous times. And you can bet it didn't do that to help cover for Israel. Galloway knows this. He couldn't not know this. But it pays to play old prejudices (literally, in Galloway's case - as in 2014 he made over £100,000 that year working for Press TV). So either the man is a massive hypocrite. Or he just doesn't like the Jews. Or both. Either way, he plays to the anti-Semitic crowd. And he knows it.
    2
  7. Galloway blames the Jews for chemical weapons attacks against Assad's enemies: https://youtu.be/RSfRBSSxW1Y
    2
  8. He blames Israel because it's the world's only Jewish state. He doesn't blame Assad, because Press TV is an Iranian propaganda channel. And Iran supports Assad. He knows pointing the finger at the world's only Jewish state is the reason why the Iranians employ him. It plays well to their audience. Especially when it's a westerner who was once an MP. Here is a Finkelstein quote from wiki on the Charlie Hebdo murders... "...So, two despairing and desperate young men act out their despair and desperation against this political pornography no different than Der Stürmer [a Nazi newspaper], who in the midst of all of this death and destruction decide its somehow noble to degrade, demean, humiliate and insult the people. I'm sorry, maybe it is very politically incorrect. I have no sympathy for [the staff of Charlie Hebdo]. Should they have been killed? Of course not. But of course, Streicher [who ran Der Stürmer] shouldn't have been hung. I don't hear that from many people'' Finkelstein is one of those whiny types that are habitually full of self loathing. A useful idiot. But he's not anti-Semitic.
    2
  9. When Galloway declared he wanted to make Bradford an 'Israeli-free zone' what do you think he was referring to? The Israeli state? Was the Israeli state operating out of Bradford? And who do you think he was hoping to gain support from by saying that? And if a politician had said 'Let's make Bradford a Pakistani free zone', what does that imply? And who might be attracted by it? I have no particular interest in Israel, but absolutely I try Galloway by the company he keeps. The type of people that both Corbyn and Galloway regularly mix with make the BNP look like choirboys. And if the tory leadership hung out with Le Pen (who despite her repulsiveness, is considerably less bad than the filth Corbyn and Galloway support), I'd have no problem trying them for the company they keep. Like I said, Galloway is very careful about what he says and how he says it. And Corbyn spent much of his career on the back benches sitting right next to Galloway. You recognise what Galloway is, even if you don't agree that he's anti-Semitic. So, why didn't Corbyn?
    2
  10. That's where I disagree. Galloway sold out his principles a long time ago. That's if he ever had any to begin with. Which I doubt. Mad or bad or both. Either way, Galloway takes the money and says what's expected.
    2