Comments by "Todd Beamer" (@toddbeamer6131) on "Candid with Lubna"
channel.
-
4
-
Cheer up. There is no better time to criticise islame. The best historical evidence shows there was no city of mecca at the supposed time of (fictional) muhammed. No mecca at that time, or in the 6th century, 5th, 4th, etc. Geography simply rules out any famous city at that place because it lies in a desert and has only the most pitiful natural water source. To claim it was an ancient city going back to Abraham requires extraordinary evidence to support. And they have none. Zero. No archaeological finds from the 7th century or earlier. The earliest artifacts are from an 13th century Turkish fort. The entire historical basis of their cult is an obvious lie. That is the reason they have no original 7th century muhammed quran, no original 7th century Uthman quran, no original 7th century quran at all, no original 7th century hadiths, no original 7th century sira. Jay Smith and the research team behind him have now tracked down the earliest existing copies of the hadiths, and they are all far later than previously stated. The coin evidence and inscriptions show the cult was a later fabrication project, done under the command of arab rulers who lived far north of the arabian peninsula.
3
-
1
-
1