Comments by "" (@thomasherrin6798) on "The Chinese Collapse: A (MASSIVE) Housing Overbuild || Peter Zeihan" video.

@jackmccombs3602 The CCP always blames it on somebody else (Majorly the US, then Europe, not so much Tawain as they try to give them no importance they only slap them down when they do something that upsets their perceived governance like the Nancy visit) and a large section of society will believe that, but a large section of society will want to keep out of it also it's one thing to lose out economically and live out a less wealthy lifestyle or even have to emigrate (It has happened before) but its another to get involved in a full scale war far bigger than the Russian-Ukraine conflict and still be worse off in the end, there is no "profit" in attacking Tawain, it will not solve any of China's problems, it will only serve to multiply them!?!
9
@ishtiaquealamin6147 No it isn't, it has problems but not major systemic problems like China and the US took action in various countries by invitation or for security concerns, they did not invade countries illegally like Russia to take them over, China's best friend!?!
5
@AlohaKutla China's investments in infrastructure of poor nations especially in Africa and Pakistan is not going to be repaid, Russia owes the most debt but this can be taken from energy supplies. China has a fraction of agricultural land in the US and is ranked at number 18 of foreign countries owning land in the US, obviously the US would look into the security aspect of that, the top Country is Canada and the remaining top ten are European countries!?!
5
 @ishtiaquealamin6147 China has worse infrastructure and the US doesn't use high speed trains they use planes due to the distance factor!?!
4
@ishtiaquealamin6147 It doesn't appear that way, the US has problems, always has, but a lot less than China's, it has 4 times less the population, but it's GDP is between 26% and 60% higher (Depending on whose figures you believe for China's GDP as it is not independently verifiable)!?!
3
@Vzzdak Yes at a cost of 100,000 Yuan instead of 550,000 Yuan if your home is repossessed or some such numbers, it didn't quite explain how the professional debt bearers get away with not paying though, it seems very, very murky!?!
2
@ishtiaquealamin6147 I don't subscribe to PPP, it's an assumption of an assumption, and that's assuming that you can take China's GDP/ PPP at face value as it is independently unverifiable as it does not publish the corresponding data, you are pointing to the US and your comments are malicious, while saying China is somehow superior, it is not, it has more problems than the US but I will wait and see!?!
1
 @jwatkins672012 Only in the US!?!
1
 @darbyheavey406 Anybody can it's just at what price point and how long it lasts!?!
1